In our context, «standards» represent the level of accommodation and service
required of air carriers to meet some of the special needs of consumers with disabilities.
Not exact matches
Two changes in particular are desperately
required: the launch
of a low - cost
carrier that can compete with upstarts like
Air Transat and Sunwing, and relief for the pension woes.
The Families Flying Together Act would
require the U.S. Department
of Transportation to direct each
carrier to «establish a policy to ensure, to the extent practicable, that a family that purchases tickets for a flight with that
air carrier is seated together during that flight; and (2) make the policy... available to the public on an appropriate Internet Web site
of the
air carrier.»
Reimbursement
of funds will
require submission
of receipts for
air travel purchased through a US - flag
carrier (no exceptions) and meeting registration.
Any
air carrier proposing to resume service within the one - year period must file with the Department's Dockets Section, at least 45 days before the date on which service is expected to resume, a notice
of such intent and updated fitness information as
required by section 204.3.
The Department
of Transportation (DOT or Department) is issuing a final rule that changes the mishandled - baggage data that
air carriers are
required to report, from the number
of Mishandled Baggage Reports (MBR) and the number
of domestic passenger enplanements to the number
of mishandled bags and the number
of enplaned bags.
By petition dated February 21, 2001, the Tall Club
of Silicon Valley (Tall Club) has asked us to adopt a rule
requiring air carriers to provide special seating accommodations to tall people upon their request.
To the extent that the ACAA and Part 382 violations occurred in interstate
air transportation, the incidents are also violations
of 49 U.S.C. § 41702, which
requires that
air carriers provide safe and adequate interstate
air transportation; to the extent the violations occurred in foreign
air transportation, the incidents violate 49 U.S.C. § 41310, which, in part, prohibits
air carriers and foreign
air carriers from unreasonably discriminating against any person in foreign
air transportation.
To the extent that the ACAA and Part 382 violations occurred in interstate
air transportation, the incidents are also violations
of 49 U.S.C. § 41702, which
requires that
air carriers provide safe and adequate interstate
air transportation; to the extent the violations occurred in foreign
air transportation, the incidents would violate 49 U.S.C. § 41310, which, in part, prohibits
air carriers and foreign
air carriers from unreasonably discriminating against any person in foreign
air transportation.
This order concerns violations by Allegiant
Air, LLC, (Allegiant)
of (1) the requirements
of 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382) with respect to properly coding and recording its disability - related complaints in connection with
required disability reporting to the Department
of Transportation (Department), as well as providing dispositive written responses to written consumer complaints alleging a violation
of Part 382, and related statutory provisions, 49 U.S.C. § § 41702 and 41705; (2) the Department's full - fare advertising requirements, 14 CFR 399.84; and (3) 49 U.S.C. § 41712, which prohibits
carriers from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices and unfair methods
of competition.
The
Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in air travel and requires air carriers to accommodate the needs of passengers with disabiliti
Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) prohibits discrimination on the basis
of disability in
air travel and requires air carriers to accommodate the needs of passengers with disabiliti
air travel and
requires air carriers to accommodate the needs of passengers with disabiliti
air carriers to accommodate the needs
of passengers with disabilities.
SUMMARY: This document
requires most certificated U.S.
air carriers and foreign
air carriers operating to and from the U.S. that conduct passenger - carrying service to record and categorize complaints that they receive alleging inadequate accessibility or discrimination on the basis
of disability according to the type
of disability and nature
of complaint, prepare a summary report
of those complaints, submit the report annually to the Department
of Transportation's (Department or DOT) Aviation Consumer Protection Division, and retain copies
of correspondence and record
of action taken on disabilityrelated complaints for three years.
The consumer report also includes reports
of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury
of pets traveling by
air, as
required to be filed by U.S.
carriers.
This report also includes reports
of incidents involving pets traveling by
air, as
required to be filed by U.S.
carriers.
The Department
of Transportation is issuing a third «Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections» final rule to enhance protections for
air travelers and to improve the
air travel environment as follows: expanding the pool
of reporting
carriers for service quality data;
requiring reporting
carriers to include service quality data for their domestic scheduled flights operated by their code - share partners; enhancing the Department's code - share disclosure regulation to codify the statutory requirement that
carriers and ticket agents must disclose any code - share arrangements on their websites on the first display presented in response to a search
of a requested itinerary for each itinerary involving a code - share operation; and prohibiting undisclosed biasing based on
carrier identity by
carriers and ticket agents in any electronic displays
of the fare, schedule or availability information
of multiple
carriers.
To the extent that the ACAA and Part 382 violations occurred in interstate
air transportation, the incidents are also violations
of 49 U.S.C. § 41702, which
requires that
air carriers provide safe and adequate interstate
air transportation.
In selecting communities to participate in the program, the statute
requires DOT to give priority to those communities where (a) average
air fares are higher than the
air fares for all communities; (b) a portion
of the cost
of the activity contemplated by the community is provided from local, non-airport-revenue sources; (c) a public - private partnership has been or will be established to facilitate
air carrier service to the public; (d) improved service will bring the material benefits
of scheduled
air transportation to a broad section
of the traveling public, including businesses, educational institutions, and other enterprises whose access to the National
air transportation system is limited (e) the assistance will be used in a timely fashion; and, (f) multiple communities cooperate to submit a regional or multistate application to consolidate
air service into one regional airport.
Should NewLeaf's business model evolve into that
of an
air carrier, the agency will
require NewLeaf to hold the appropriate licence.»
If you are traveling by plane, domestic and international
air carriers require a significant amount
of documentation.
The
carriers also argued that undue hardship would be caused by losses in competitive advantage caused by a 1P1F policy, in that
carriers required to adopt a 1P1F policy would receive most
of the demand by persons with severe disabilities for additional seating to travel by
air.
The distinct issues
of: (1) the number
of persons traveling by
air who are
required by the airlines to be accompanied by an attendant, and (2) travel propensity, are further examples
of how the
carriers» tactical decision to withhold actual data meant the parties, and ultimately the Agency, had to engage in a lengthy and complex analysis based on less than ideal data.