No federal projects were ever built with the new standards, because it took years to go through
the required public comment process before the rules were finalized.
Not exact matches
One common concern expressed is how a
required state environmental review, which can involve a lengthy
public comment period, will fit in with the
process.
The APA notice - and -
comment process recognizes that changes may be made to the proposed rule based on the
public comments received, but the courts have
required that any changes made in the final rule be of a type that could have been reasonably anticipated by the
public — a logical outgrowth of the proposal.
The informal rulemaking
process, which often is referred to as «notice - and -
comment rulemaking,»
requires that an agency first issue a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) and provide an opportunity for
public comment on the proposal before it can issue a final rule.
This will be a long, drawn - out
process that will
require public comment, but the move will effectively keep the rule from going into action.
We
require that exceptions for rules to ensure appropriate state regulation of insurance and health plans be stated in a statute or regulation, so that such exceptions will be clearly tied to statements of priorities made by publicly accountable bodies (e.g., through the
public comment process for regulations, and by elected officials through statutes).
The
comments point to perhaps a central disconnect in the larger
public understanding of Bitcoin Core's
processes, and how despite the nature of bitcoin as a well - oiled blockchain, its upkeep
requires time and resources that (outside of the altruism of a few for - profit companies) is still largely volunteer.
The bill would
require the EPA to withdraw their «Waters of the U.S.» proposed rule and start the regulatory
process from scratch, making sure there is a comprehensive scientific analysis and robust
public review and
comment period.