Nearly one - third of the 450,000 Arizona students who took a state -
required standardized achievement test were given incorrect scores by the computer firm hired to grade the tests.
Not exact matches
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA; 2015)
requires states to broaden school accountability beyond
achievement on
standardized tests and high school graduation rates.
Before the re-authorization of IDEA of 2004, there was a «discrepancy» rule, which
required a «significant» discrepancy between a child's intellectual ability (measured by IQ) and their academic functioning (measured by
standardized Achievement Tests.)
Increasing funding in 2002, No Child Left Behind
required the adoption of a common set of english and math standards correlated with
achievement goals along, measured by
standardized testing for federal accountability.
They also, along with others troubled by New York's — particularly NYC's — notorious
achievement gaps, yearned to release school leaders from the muzzle of LIFO, which
requires that teachers be laid off by seniority, not effectiveness, and change old - school subjective teacher evaluations to reflect student academic growth, measured in part through
standardized test scores.
Last year, Primary Sources: 2012, a report by Scholastic and the Gates Foundation, found that only 28 percent of educators see state -
required standardized tests as an important gauge of student
achievement.
ASCD believes that accurately assessing student
achievement requires more than results on
standardized tests in two or three subjects.
While the law took us a step forward by
requiring schools to disaggregate
achievement data and produce evidence that students were learning, it took us several steps backward when that evidence was reduced to how well a student performs on a
standardized test.»
The new law
requires states to design rating systems that rely heavily on student
achievement, including proficiency rates on
standardized math and reading
tests, year - to - year growth on those
tests and graduation rates.
Chalfant ruled that the Stull Act
requires the district to use California
standardized test scores in determining student
achievement.
The results of the 1992 Gallup Poll indicated that 71 % of public school parents favored
requiring public schools to use
standardized tests to measure the academic
achievement of students.
While the task force results may be eye - opening to the general public, they come as no surprise to local educators, who say they have known for years that the topics covered by New Jersey's High School Proficiency Assessment (HSPA), the
standardized test used in grades 11 and 12 to measure
achievement and
required for graduation, is not a measure of college readiness.
It also
required the State board to withdraw from PARCC and select an existing nationally administered
standardized test that is currently accepted as a high school
achievement and college entrance exam.
Many states now
require the use of value - added models in evaluations as a measure of the a teacher's or school leader's impact on student
achievement, as determined by results on state
standardized tests.
ESSA
requires states to set a long - term goal and shorter - term, interim goals — which must in some way address proficiency rates on
standardized tests, English - language proficiency, graduation rates, and
achievement gaps — but states will operationalize the specific standards and metrics of the goals themselves.72
The same is true for K — 12
standardized achievement tests and metrics such as annual yearly progress
required by No Child Left Behind.