Sentences with phrase «required teams of players»

Survival required teams of players to fight to the death inside an ever - shrinking play area.

Not exact matches

For instance, instead of a bullet point reading «10 + years experience required,» consider something along the lines of «Team player with strong leadership skills and 10 or more years of demonstrated ability to manage effectively.»

This will require you to quickly assess the abilities of all players and decide of everyone is on the right team and in the appropriate role.

«The comments by Hope Solo after the match against Sweden during the 2016 Olympics were unacceptable and do not meet the standard of conduct we require from our national team players,» Gulati said in a press release.

U.S. Soccer President Sunil Gulati said the comments Solo made after Sweden beat the U.S. at the Rio Olympics were «unacceptable and do not meet the standard of conduct we require from our National Team players.»

Smart leaders understand that executing a change in direction — even a small one --(picture of basketball players) requires their own thinking, expectations, and beliefs to shift, as well as those of the people on their team.

Each team will be required to make a minimum donation of # 750 to The Arsenal Foundation to enter a squad of 15 players.

Wenger has no tactics, plays his favourite players over better players, gives long term contracts to average and injury prone players, hates strong physical players, plays players out of position, always looking for excuse like refrees and saying other teams played more in pre season, does nt spend money on players required like if we need strikers he will buy CAM, waits for other teams to buy top players and signs average on deadline day, calls accident when we lose, talks cohesion and mental strength when we beat terrible teams and win mickey mouse trophy like Asia cup and community shield.

If we did strengthen our team in those areas that require strengthening with the right players and made a very good effort of winning whatever is in front of us, and still came 2nd, 3rd, or 4th etc., I would be one of the first to congratulate the teams efforts.

Why on earth would Evans want to leave the comfort of a Team that defends as it is coached and required to do - namely DEFEND any come to our train wreck of a back 3 / 4/5 /???? (Whatever the players decide).

Established teams one or two moves from a title can overpay a pure (possible) scorer... I just don't think our timeline or current trajectory requires us to have a player of his «non-primary» skill sets (think Barnes w / Golden State).

Every play in football requires 11 players simultaneously jolting into action, and NFL teams have complex methods of making this work.

Yes we could have gone for Falcao or Cavani with their goal scoring ability and their ridiculous wage demands, but they wouldn't have moulded into this Arsenal team that requires a specific type of player.

A blatant disregard for procuring the required number of quality players to bring a greater balance to your squad / team and thus increase the potential for a challenging side.

However players need an EU work permit, which requires 75 % call - up (of opportunities available) to a player's national team (ranked greater than 70by FIFA).

I have enough of wenger and this team just need new manager with fresh ideas and new required players for CB, DM, ST position..

What a fantastic problem to have trying to fit the likes of wilshire chamberlain and Rosicky into the team, we really do have great depth in our team now to the last few players required to win the league.

Wenger motivates the team, Alexis doesn't seem short of motivation so maybe we have to also consider the attitude of the individual players as well, maybe a bit of a clear out is needed to get players who are mentally motivated as well to match the team and managers ambition... This will require transfers and Silent Stan has final say on profit... I mean players.

I'd have focused more on Torres (which I did), the lack of CB depth (I'd prefer to have two quality CBs to back up a 3 back rather than just one with one of the starters being a converted CDM), the lack of players who fit the outside mid role well in this formation (which, hey, maybe that's part of what you were referring to), and the fact that when you play more attackers higher up the pitch, it often requires a team to be able to implement a high pressuring defensive line (Dempsey and Bruin are not suited for that).

My only real gripe, (apart from the lack of a few key signings) is a number of our players seem too comfortable and don't seem to have the winning / aggresive mentality required to kill off teams and convincingly win games.

Every team should be required to have a minimum of 18 players with nicknames like «Granny» or «Pie Face?»

Nwakali is a forward or wing player, nothing like kante and Ramsey is a squad player for me not first team quality, if Carzola is fit, him and xhaka would be a mouth watering fit but with Arsenals Injurie luck this seems inlikely but i wounder if the five at the back would work if we play a stubborn team that defends, i hope Arsene would change the formation in such games back to 4 -2-3-1 but this would require a proper rght wing which we havent had in years, we've had OX, Campell, Wallcot, Iwobi, Ramsey, Welbeck and Ozil play in that position and non of them have made it their own like sanchez has with the left wing

If the team is not performing well it is a factor of a couple of things, sure the manager plays a big part (transfer windows policy, tactics) but the players also have to perform to the level required at Arsenal: sure we could have better players at certain positions but talent we're not lacking across the field.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Also I like how African players usually hold good physical attributes which this team needs, Fabregas played at 16/17 years of age so we may see Chukwueze and Nwakali sooner than we think, if they have the physical ability required well then you never know.

I believe Arsene and his whole coaching management staff has had there time an should honourably leave.Please GOONERS sacrifice your support for the present teams chosen and if personally required make it known we are NOT happy / satisfied with of how the club is handled.There is NO growth and half the players are not premier league standard.looking at the top 6 clubs.Somebody got to take the fall and it is not Kroenkie as we seen the money was spent.We buying where we had a little strength and where we really required (defensive) for a long time faith is put in people like Calum, Mustafi, bellerin, Holding etc.. I feel for El Nenny who is hardworking with the wrong chemistry.The other 5 top clubs will never take these players in there premier side.

I understand what you're saying bounty hunter, but I feel like the week prior to big games should be enough time to at least tweak our formation slightly or employ a certain tactic, whether it's counter attack with less possession or playing with two strikers up top instead of the lone striker, I would hope that players at the level required for arsenal would be able to adjust to this as it seems I tend to hear other teams coming away from big wins uttering phrases like «we worked on the manager's ideas this week and executed them well», I cant remember our players saying this for a while.

Ours are obviously not required to do so, and unless that is changed, you can buy us a team of the 11 best players in the world, and we would still loose out.

I'd argue that trading for an extremely expensive big man who makes your already - present, likewise extremely expensive big man worse is not a particularly good idea, particularly if it also denudes your team of the perimeter scoring that both players require alongside them if they're to be at their most effective.

The guy is currently not a key player for us but he's got the required quality to be a 2nd or 3rd option just in case.We have to be smart in allowing him to go or not.Honestly speaking Arsenal's injury situation is more of a curse.He should be sent on loan next season to a spanish team.He needs to go to a league which is not so physical.I believe he can excel over there.However, I still believe that Jack can be one of Arsenal's best players in the future.Allowing him to go is still a wrong choice.We need to loan him to a spanish team.

I for one will continue calling him a RIDICULOUS manager, why, because we play top quality teams giving them advantages in various areas to use against, playing players who do not have all the required requisites to play in very important positions, showing massive favoritism to players who are not even fully fit, over using players, while there are adequate substitutes on the bench or in the squad and not fixing the deficiencies in the team because of stubbornness.

Those silly points we drop against teams everybody expect us to steamroller is because of absent players... the same absent players... the same players we can predict will be injured for most of next season — requiring players to stand in and be out of position, be unhappy, get flack for not being his amazing self and so on.

An offensive player doesn't need to defend like a defensive player, because of his position, but he is still required to be the first defender in the team.

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

Ozil in a way is our Messi — You do nt find Messi tracking back as much, yet he doesn't get criticised for not doing so, cause his job in the team is to create and score and he does that brilliantly by reserving his energy to do so.I do understand the the PL requires alot more of players defensively, but Mahrez ai nt exactly a good defensive player yet he does his job for the team that's most probably going to win the PL this season.

Obviously not all youth players will make the required high - standards of the first team.

Finally, can we talk about fixing a draft that requires players to put on the hat of a team that has no interest in employing them?

Not only is he my favorite player at the club but we cant keep disbanding the team plus on top of that not buying the players required to improve us.

Anyone claiming iwobi doesn't deserves to be an arsenal player siting lack of potential or insufficient potential is clearly ignorant about football.this is a player requiring 2 to 3 changes in his to become world class.Need i remind my fellow gooners that out of the stellar caste of academy players which include dion zelalem, Jeff Adelaide, Chris willock, biellick, akpom etc iwobi is the only one making the first team this I assure you is not mere luck or coincidence or as sum here would be put it «being Wenger's favourite» - most so called wenger favourites are actually our best players - but becos of his immense potential, clear headedness and hard work.lest we forget he was actually in contention for the golden boy award.so does of you not seeing his potentials should f**k off.

Suarez made people like Jordan Henderson look good because of his intensity, it was infectious a bit like sanchez no question he raises the performance levels of the team, but there is no sense in having a diamond if you're only going to coat it in $ hit, we need to make sure the players around him can hold their own and can deliver when required.

Especially for younger players, you want to beware the unintended consequences of signalling to the team that one specific, short - timed drill is when effort is most required.

the problem lies in fact that most fans see only name and fame of player Jamie vardy would have been a good backup player to have considering our luck with injuries and it is not always about the transfer fee or name remember falcao robinho mutu schevshenko etc etc about engine vardy had an amazing engine and modern game always require hard workers in team how many times u have seen ox tracking back he carelessly loses ball at dangerous positions very often

the first half was very poor and almost every pass got intercepted due to the huge amount of space between players, we werent able to move the ball forward quickly and when we did we lost it, i know this isn't out starting 11 but the players need to play much more compact on sunday or this formation will never work, pressing is also required and im saying as a team not one player busting a gut to chase it when all the defender needs to do is pass in any direction and that's it threat gone!!

On the other hand established players signing for a London team, with the attraction and distraction of the bright city lights, may well become complacent big - time Charlies now that they have made the big time; without the need for the hard work that a more competitive squad would require.

Spurs are another team we could look at too, despite them challenging for the title last season, and participating in the Champions League this season, they have not been able to attract the quality of players they require to push on, nor have they been able to emulate their league success.

An ideal United team requires a combination of youth and world class players, and with youngsters like Fosu Mensah, Rashford, Pereira, Weir, Poole and many others to come, we could be a force to be reckoned with next season, but right now uncertainty reigns when it comes to who will be managing the team, and who they might buy or sell.

Unlike his Dutch adversary, Klopp may not be a manager who seeks victory through smothering opponents with possession but he too requires a certain level of slickness from his players on the ball and coherency from his team as a group in order for his own tactics to be effective rather than wasteful and chaotic.

The fact that Marcus Rashford and Timothy Fosu - Mensah were promoted to the first team also sees these two missing from the squad, so the U18's might be firing goals easily, the U23's have a serious lack of talent in their squad this season, which requires some attention in January, or the decline will continue further at this level, at least until some of the talented U18 players are promoted.

A few players have left on loan recently, most notably Sanmi Odelusi, but the likes of Georg Illiev, Kaiyne Woolery, Chris Lester, Luke Woodland, Tom Walker and possibly even the seemingly finished Tom Eaves, are all still here and could be called upon to step up to the first team if required.

That style of football requires players capable of creating and expediting it, whereas the present team are short in that department.