Sentences with phrase «required under the convention»

The CSI has comprehensively reviewed POPs emissions from cement plants, and worked closely with the Stockholm Convention (on POPs) Secretariat to help formulate reliable control measures as required under the convention.

First the amended NTA fails to meet the standard of equality required under the Convention.

Not exact matches

The convention authorized the establishment of a «Central University» provided that no less than half the required million dollars were in hand, and named the members of its Board of Trust, who were to function under supervision of the bishops of the church.

In time of war or other public emergency threatening the life of the nation any High Contracting Party may take measures derogating from its obligations under this Convention to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such measures are not inconsistent with its other obligations under international law.

Under state law, these delegates were required to vote on the first ballot at the Republican National Convention for the winner of the statewide primary.

Under the Climate Change Convention, which holds its first formal meeting in Berlin in March, they are all required to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000.

Filed Under: Around the Blog, Important Things Tagged With: apologies, conventions, eastercon, hugo awards, hugos, requires - hate

This Climate Action Report was one of a series of reports required periodically pursuant to U.S. responsibilities under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, the foundational climate treaty.

The U.S. has failed to submit by 1 January a major report required under U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

In accordance with its obligations under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), Japan agreed to require that all whole ivory tusks imported prior to the 1989 CITES international ivory trade ban and entering trade within Japan be registered with the government.

This in turn required the developed countries to report annual GHG inventory every year; prepare a biennial report — highlighting the progress made in meeting its obligations under the Convention, both, on mitigation pledges and support; and national communication every four years; and, for the developing countries to prepare a biennial update report, including GHG inventory, on planning and implementing NAMAs, and to prepare a national communication every four years.

Annex II Parties are required to provide financial resources to enable developing countries to undertake emissions reduction activities under the convention and to help them adapt to effects of climate change.

Under Section 12 of the UNFCCC, countries listed in Annex I of the Convention (including the US) are required to periodically submit to the Treaty's Secretariat a detailed «National Communication,» which presents a wide range of information regarding the nation's implementation of the agreement.

The Milan meeting, which ends tomorrow, is intended to gauge countries» progress under the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change, and to hash out details of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, an amendment to the original pact requiring cuts in gas emissions by industrialized countries.

The United States has failed to meet a key deadline (January 1, 2018) for submitting a major report, required under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Last year, the Administrative Court held that the ECF scheme is unlawful as it gives rise to an unacceptable risk that people will not be able to obtain legal aid where required by the European Convention on Human Rights or under EU law.

As per the Court's ruling in C - 277 / 11 M.M. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, this will also require ensuring that the child's right to be heard is respected in accordance with their age and maturity and the right to good administration under Article 41 of the Charter.

@Jason: The agreement of the receiving state is required to appoint an ambassador (head of mission) under Article 4 of the Vienna Convention.

Thus, the Convention requires the left - behind parent to establish that the child was taken from the «habitual residence» and that the parent had «rights of custody» under the law of that jurisdiction.

Under article 4 of that Convention, a contracting state is required to grant its nationality to a person not born in the territory of the contracting state, who would otherwise be stateless, if the nationality of one or both of the person's parents at the time of the person's birth was that of the contracting state.

Those approached for disclosure must be aware of their obligations to facilitate a fair trial under the provisions of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, especially if the third party is a local authority, which will require those tasked for disclosure of documentation to act reasonably in all the circumstances of the application.

However, the SIA did not violate the principles of fundamental justice under section 7, as there was no international consensus that article 14 of the Convention Against Torture, which requires state parties to provide means for redress, was fundamental to the operation of the international legal system (at para 147).

Similarly, public authorities are required to act compatibility with Convention rights under the Human Rights Act 1998.

A's application, he said, engaged WF's rights under European Convention 1950, Art 8; and this may require the courts positively to ensure that a person in WF's position was aware of the intended incursions into her private life.

The interpretive obligation under s3 (1) HRA 1998 requires the court to interpret UK legislation in compliance with the Convention.

In the United Kingdom High Court (Administrative) decision of DD v Secretary of State for Home Department [2014](«DD») Ouseley J was required to consider, on a preliminary basis, whether the imposition of a Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measure («TPIM»)(the successor of control orders) had violated the appellant's right to freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment under article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights («ECHR»).

Notwithstanding a judgment of non-return pursuant to Article 13 of the 1980 Hague Convention, any subsequent judgment which requires the return of the child issued by a court having jurisdiction under this Regulation shall be enforceable in accordance with Section 4 of Chapter III below in order to secure the return of the child.

The court is also required to consider whether extradition would breach your Human Rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.

As to devolution, it was argued that triggering Art 50 required not only statutory authorisation from the Westminster Parliament but that under the Legislative Consent Convention (better known as the Sewel Convention) or, in Northern Ireland, because of the Good Friday Agreement, consent was also required from the Scottish Assembly, the Welsh government, and the Northern Ireland Assembly and even «the people» of Northern Ireland.

The government wants to retain this policy but is required to review it under its European Convention on Human Rights.

Any differences between care home residents whose placement was arranged under s 21 and private residences could not either justify or require a different approach to the application to the care home of the Convention.

The chapeau of Art. 8 (2)(a) requires that the property be «protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention».

This is required under Article 1 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Article 1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).

The Government is required to present a report every two years on how it is achieving this, and other commitments under the Convention, and to appear before the Committee for this report to be considered.

The government representatives presented a very different view of what was required of State Parties under the Convention in ensuring that Indigenous representatives participated in the formulation of legislation and policies which directly affect them:

work with the government to advance ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and the establishment of a national system of regular inspections of all places of detention (as required under the Protocol)

The Committee reaffirms all aspects of its decisions 2 (54) and 2 (55) and reiterates its recommendation that the State party should ensure effective participation by indigenous communities in decisions affecting their land rights, as required under article 5 (c) of the Convention and General Recommendation XXIII of the Committee, which stresses the importance of securing the «informed consent» of indigenous peoples.

This clarification indicates that the government does not in fact accept that a substantive equality approach is required in order to meet its obligations under the Convention.

The Committee reaffirms all aspects of its decisions 2 (54) and 2 (55) and reiterates its recommendation that the State party should ensure effective participation by indigenous communities in decisions affecting their land rights, as required under article 5 (c) of the Convention [ICERD] and General Recommendation XXIII of the Committee, which stresses the importance of securing the «informed consent» of indigenous peoples.

This answer is of concern because, in the first instance, it fails to acknowledge that the provision of court interpreters, where required, is fundamental to a fair trial and equal treatment in legal proceedings (as required under Article 5 (a) of the Convention).