Comparison of previous and current regulatory
requirements under the final rule «Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs.»
C, but is not specifically itemized as a separate information collection under Regulation X. Because the timing of this requirement coincides with the provision of the initial Loan Estimate to consumers, the burden associated with the written list of providers
requirement under the final rule is included in the burden calculation for the Loan Estimate.
Not exact matches
Also, the compliance
requirements for BICE have been «greatly simplified»
under the
final rule, Reish adds.
None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to implement an interim
final or
final rule regarding nutrition programs
under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) and the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) that --(1) requires crediting of tomato paste and puree based on volume; (2) implements a sodium reduction target beyond Target I, the 2 - year target, specified in Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, «Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs» (FNS — 2007 — 0038, RIN 0584 — AD59) until the Secretary certifies that the Department has reviewed and evaluated relevant scientific studies and data relevant to the relationship of sodium reductions to human health; and (3) establishes any whole grain
requirement without defining «whole grain.»
The
final rule includes new provisions related to service animal relief areas and captioning of televisions and audio - visual displays that are similar to existing
requirements applicable to U.S. and foreign air carriers
under the Department's Air Carrier Access (ACAA) regulations, 14 CFR Part 382 (Part 382).
Under this
final rule, the
requirements of 49 CFR 393.60 are revised to allow for the utilization of specific vehicle safety technologies that would be mounted on the interior of the windshield of a CMV, and within the area swept by the windshield wipers.
In accordance with section 3507 (d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this
final rule, which were filed
under 0579 - 0379, have been submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
In order to make uses and disclosures that are not covered by the consent
requirements and not otherwise permitted or required
under the
final rule, covered entities must obtain the individual's «authorization.»
Under the
final rule, covered entities may disclose protected health information in compliance with and as limited by relevant
requirements of: a court order or court - ordered warrant, or a subpoena or summons issued by a judicial officer.
One commenter supported the NPRM's reference to the proposed HIPAA Security
Rule, agreeing that access control and disclosure requirements under this rule should be coordinated with the final HIPAA Security R
Rule, agreeing that access control and disclosure
requirements under this
rule should be coordinated with the final HIPAA Security R
rule should be coordinated with the
final HIPAA Security
RuleRule.
The
final rule creates a narrower exemption for Department of State for uses and disclosures of protected health information (1) for purposes of a required security clearance conducted pursuant to Executive Orders 10450 and 12698; (2) as necessary to meet the
requirements of determining worldwide availability or availability for mandatory service abroad
under Sections 101 (a)(4) and 504 of the Foreign Service Act; and (3) for a family member to accompany a Foreign Service Officer abroad, consistent with Section 101 (b)(5) and 904 of the Foreign Service Act.
Based on these assumptions, the Department concludes that the principal economic effect of the
final rule would be to expand the right to request amendments to protected health information held by a health plan or provider to those who are not currently covered by amendment
requirements under state laws or codes of conduct.
The
final rule and commentary implement the
requirements of RESPA section 4, pursuant to the Bureau's implementation authority
under RESPA section 19 (a).
Under the
final rule, the creditor is responsible for delivering the Closing Disclosure form to the consumer, but creditors may use settlement agents to provide the Closing Disclosure, provided that they comply with the
final rule's
requirements for the Closing Disclosure.
To prevent unnecessary closing delays, the
final rule clarifies that, consistent with other Regulation Z disclosure
requirements under § 1026.17, where the creditor does not have the actual terms, the creditor may provide an estimate based on the best information reasonably available to the creditor on the originally provided Closing Disclosure.
This
final rule modifies the federal mortgage disclosure
requirements under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Lending Act that are implemented in Regulation Z.
In this regard, the Bureau notes that,
under the
final rule, a creditor may request such other information prior to obtaining all six items that constitute an application without triggering the disclosure
requirement.
In addition, the
final rule requires creditors and mortgage brokers to retain documentation sufficient to show their supervisory agencies that one of the exceptions applies whenever a cost for a service provided by a company that is owned by or affiliated with the creditor proves to be higher than estimated in the Loan Estimate in excess of the tolerances
under § 1026.19 (e)(3) and a revised Loan Estimate is provided, similar to the current document retention
requirements under Regulation X for when the RESPA GFE is reissued.