Sentences with phrase «requires less injury»

Not exact matches

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The conversion of astrocytes into less abundant neural stem cells (NSCs) represents a potentially exciting strategy to generate the many neurons required for the treatment of neurological disorders and brain injuries.

Training with heavy weights leads to a stronger body that's less susceptible to injury, which means taking on daily activities that require any form of lifting get easier.

Machines tend to target specific muscle groups but the defined path of motion requires much less engagement of ancillary stabilizer muscles — however machines also tend to be the least prone to causing injury.

If prepared, you are less likely to sustain injury when life throws a «rapid - response required» challenge your way.

The standard of proof, however, is less than that required in a normal personal injury case.

It is a world where jobs pay less than the minimum wage, and sometimes nothing at all; where employers do not pay overtime for 60 - hour weeks, and deny meal breaks that are required by law; where vital health and safety regulations are routinely ignored, even after injuries occur; and where workers are subject to blatant discrimination, and retaliated against for speaking up or trying to organize.

Generally cases involving relatively minor injuries where the medical problems go away in a short period of time (2 months or less) and where the medical bills are fairly small ($ 3,000 or less) don't require of the assistance of an attorney in order to obtain a favorable settlement.

Decreased earning capacity (for example, if your injury requires that you switch to a less strenuous job that pays less than your former occupation).

I'm only critical of personal injury lawyers who strive to create lengthy medico - legal expert witness battles that give rise to protracted litigation thus further driving up litigation costs — or who fail to challenge even completely unqualified insurer defence «experts» because by purging them from the system there loss would result in far less (predictable) accusations of opportunistic malingering requiring litigation.

When we start any lawsuit in Pasadena, TX, we have an idea of what is likely to happen or what the most probable outcome is, but personal injury cases have a way of often being unpredictable because of a variety of circumstances and lesser experienced law firms or attorneys can find themselves in a situation like an experienced sailor in rough seas, to use an analogy, where they are lost and unsure of what the next step is at a time when decisive actions are required to reach the best possible outcome.

Another reason that victims of alcohol or drug related accidents should seek competent legal counsel and file a civil action against the defendant instead of hoping for criminal restitution is that the standard of proof required to win an Indiana personal injury lawsuit is less than what a prosecutor must prove to convict a defendant on criminal charges.

Other times, the injuries are less severe and do not require on - going medical care or result in permanent damage.

That caused a significant fracture to Ms. Meghji's left upper arm, a less significant fracture just below and into her left knee and an injury to her left ankle, all of which required immediate medical intervention.

Broken bones and severe burns might seem less serious at first, but these injuries can require surgery to correct and might result in permanent disfigurement.

might seem less serious at first, but these injuries can require surgery to correct and might result in permanent disfigurement.

The limits of such uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage shall be equal to the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy; provided, however, that (i) the limits shall not exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident regardless of whether the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy exceed those limits and (ii) a named insured may purchase greater or lesser limits, except that the limits shall not be less than the bodily injury liability limits required pursuant to subdivision (2) of this subsection, and in no event shall an insurer be required by this subdivision to sell uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage at limits that exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident.

Uninsured / Underinsured Motorist Coverage Coverage pays for property damage or bodily injury if you are in an accident caused by an uninsured motorist (a driver who does not have the minimum level of insurance required by law) or a driver who is insured, but who has less coverage than your underinsured motorist coverage

The limits of such underinsured motorist bodily injury coverage shall be equal to the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy; provided, however, that (i) the limits shall not exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident regardless of whether the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy exceed those limits, (ii) a named insured may purchase greater or lesser limits, except that the limits shall exceed the bodily injury liability limits required pursuant to subdivision (2) of this subsection, and in no event shall an insurer be required by this subdivision to sell underinsured motorist bodily injury coverage at limits that exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident, and (iii) the limits shall be equal to the limits of uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage purchased pursuant to subdivision (3) of this subsection.

The legally required liability coverage in the state of Pennsylvania is no less than $ 15,000 in personal injury protection, $ 30,000 in bodily injury liability, and $ 5,000 in property damage liability for each vehicle owned.

New Jersey law requires you to carry a property damage liability policy with at least $ 5,000 worth of coverage and a bodily injury liability policy with limits of no less than $ 15,000 per person and $ 30,000 per accident.

Policies with only what the state requires for bodily injury and property damage liability protection cost significantly less than those with much higher limits of coverage.

It's unusual for states to require more than $ 25,000 / $ 50,000 liability coverage and even less common for uninsured motorist coverage and personal injury protection to be a requirement.

Medical payments and uninsured / underinsured motorist protection are not required in Colorado as they are in some states, but insurers are required by law to offer uninsured / underinsured motorist policies to drivers in an amount equal to the drivers» bodily injury liability policies or $ 100,000 per person and $ 300,000 per accident, whichever is the lesser of the two amounts [1].

While it might seem less expensive to simply pay for medical treatment out of pocket for sore throats and ear infections, a severe injury or the onset of a chronic illness may require much more expensive medical care.

DO NOT USE DRIVE - RITE SCHOOL - And having read the two previous reviews I can only say that I had chosen more wisely and read reviews before wasting $ 400 on an over-advertised and understaffed driving school - we have still not been scheduled for our behind the wheel training after six weeks of beginning our classroom lessons - their communications are non-existent - I had to call several times to finally get a return call about the smallest of issues - their excuse of a limited staff and inability to get students behind the wheel for the required time is ridiculous - I would never, ever use their service again and I would highly recommend that any of you looking to enroll your son or daughter for a driving school NOT USE DRIVE - RITE DRIVING SCHOOL - every individual I have spoken with that used another school had everything completed in six weeks or less - now when you contact Drive - Rite after six week having passed you can not even get a reply - DO NOT SEND YOUR SON OR DAUGHTER TO DRIVE - RITE - YOU WILL REGRET IT - just read on about others» experiences with them as well to see more personal opinions and experiences such as ours!!!! And to add insult to injury, I innocently asked when my son would get his behind the wheel training that we had paid $ 400 back in December and it is now the end of January only to finally be told «we pulled his folder and he did not pass the required state test - the state of Ohio requires a 75 % score and he scored only70 %.

Children of mothers with year 10 education or less had higher receptive vocabulary and verbal ability, experienced a reduction in injuries requiring medical attention, and they were less likely to be living in a jobless household, while their mothers were more involved in community service activities in the community (four of 19 outcomes).

Accidents and injuries were less common; 11 % had experienced three or more accidents or injuries requiring medical attention since birth.