Moe, for reasons I'll explain in a moment, thinks «reform unionism» is a pipe dream and that the only effective way to drive school improvement is by getting the system incentives to emphasize performance — which
requires measures of student learning.
Not exact matches
No, the use
of student learning measures will continue to be part
of teacher evaluation as
required by state law.
To achieve this, it is not enough to
measure what learners
learn: it is essential to target the classroom experiences that fundamentally shape
student learning, and emphasize the range
of skills
required for lifelong well - being and societal cohesion.
Measuring the deeper
learning required by the Common Core
requires that
students write extensively and much
of that writing can not yet be scored by technology.
A: The TEACHNJ Act — New Jersey's teacher tenure law —
requires educator evaluations that include multiple
measures of student learning.
Washington's high - risk designation specified that the State must submit, by May 1, 2014, final guidelines for teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements
of ESEA flexibility, including
requiring local educational agencies (LEAs) to use
student achievement on CCR State assessments to
measure student learning growth in those systems for teachers
of tested grades and subjects.
I recognize that
requiring the use
of statewide assessments to
measure student learning growth
requires a legislative change, and that Governor Inslee and your office worked diligently to obtain that change.
From the abstract: Authors
of this report find that «within the 30 states that [still]
require student learning measures to be at least a significant factor in teacher evaluations, state guidance and rules in most states allow teachers to be rated effective even if they receive low scores on the
student learning component
of the evaluation.»
Implemented effectively, competency - based education can improve quality and consistency, reduce costs, shorten the time
required to graduate, and provide us with true
measures of student learning.
Sixteen states
require evaluations to include some objective
measures of student learning, and four states
require evidence
of student learning as the prevailing criterion for teacher evaluation (Zinth, 2010).
NCTQ also found that 30 states now
require that teacher evaluations include objective evidence
of student learning, a reversal from 2009, when 35 states did not
require teacher evaluations to include any such
measure.
It
requires teachers at every school to help design the
measures of student learning that will be used to grade them.
Measuring student growth without relying solely on narrow standardized tests involves looking at multiple
measures of student learning, such as essay exams, portfolios
of students» work in various subjects, and group projects that
require analysis, investigation, experimentation, cooperation, and written, oral, or graphic presentation
of findings.
This would give teachers time to
learn the instructional shifts
required to teach for higher academic standards while some
of the issues around
measuring student performance are worked out.
We are being told that our evaluation system will
require our full comprehension and maintenance
of:
measures of teacher practice observation option selection forms, evaluator forms, consistent update
of class lists / rosters, observation options A, B, C, D, the Matrix, and MOSL options (project based
learning assessments,
student learning inventories, performance based assessments, and progress monitoring assessments), not to mention how this plays out for what people teach (elementary / middle / high school, alternative assessment, English as a New Language, content areas, etc).
--
Requiring districts to identify the top 25 %
of teachers using multiple
measures, including
student learning growth as the main element.
Well - designed accountability policy, on its own, does four things well: first, it
requires participants to believe that all
students can
learn and succeed; second, it
measures the academic progress
of all
students over time; third, it highlights gaps between different groups
of students (be they racial, geographic, socio - economic, special education and gifted
students, or English language proficiency); and fourth, it assigns consequences for not meeting goals around
student progress.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant affirmed his preliminary ruling this week, finding that the district has violated a 40 - year - old state law, known as the Stull Act,
requiring that evaluations
of teachers and principals include
measures of how much
students learn what the state and district expects them to know.
Georgia Department
of Education —
Student Learning Objectives and Charter Schools How many growth
measures are
required in Charter Schools for...
Requiring each district to
measure and track the efficiency and effectiveness
of its ELT schools, including developing measurable goals to annually and longitudinally assess the implementation and impact
of additional
learning time on
student achievement, retention, attendance, higher education attainment, and other relevant
measures.
Another trend — exemplified by the humanizing law school movement — seeks to improve both
learning and
student well - being by decreasing some
of the well - documented negative psychological effects
of law school created in part by the focus on competition and extrinsic motivation.8 Law schools are beginning to respond to these reports by revising their curricula and preparing for anticipated changes in the American Bar Association (ABA) standards for law school accreditation that will
require a greater focus on
student assessment and outcome
measures.9