Sentences with phrase «requires public review»

Their support was necessary for the acquisition plan to move along under the city's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure that requires public review of land use plans.

According to the press release, «the draft zoning text amendment... would require a new special permit for certain developments in the Two Bridges Large Scale Residential Area, to clarify that large, out - of - scale development proposals are not «minor modifications» to this area's plan and would require public review.»

Philanthropy, unlike government funding, required no public review of priorities or spending.

Not exact matches

The Food and Drug Administration said late Thursday it will not require preliminary review before companies can sell so - called carrier screening tests to the public.

To further increase the possibility that all borrowers have a fair opportunity to request a foreclosure review, the Comptroller of the Currency and the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System should require that servicers include a range of potential remediation amounts or categories in communication materials and other outreach, such as direct mailings to borrowers, public service announcements, the independent foreclosure review website, regulators» websites, and officials» testimonies and speeches.

The priority review user fee required by this subsection shall be due upon the submission of a human drug application under section 505 (b)(1) or section 351 (a) of the Public Health Service Act for which the priority review voucher is used.

Between now and April 17, 2017, the Department will continue to receive and review these additional public comments, and between now and January 1, 2018, the Department will perform the examination required by the President.

Lastly, Facebook has now instituted Login Review, where a team of its employees audit any app that requires more than the basic data of someone's public profile, list of friends, and email address.

7) The Committee shall review and consider with the External Auditors the matters required to be discussed by the applicable standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board.

These discussions included a review of the reasonableness of significant judgments, the quality, not just acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the audit committee by Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 61, as amended (Communications with Audit Committees), by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014, the firm's judgments as to the acceptability and quality of FedEx's accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)(the «PCAOB»), including those matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Commipublic accounting firm the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014, the firm's judgments as to the acceptability and quality of FedEx's accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)(the «PCAOB»), including those matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit CommiPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)(the «PCAOB»), including those matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees.

The Russian review of ArcSight's source code, the closely guarded internal instructions of the software, was part of HPE's effort to win the certification required to sell the product to Russia's public sector, according to the regulatory records seen by Reuters and confirmed by a company spokeswoman.

What is required is discipline in managing the public finances, with a root and branch review of all current expenditure commitments.

Avella's bill requires that the attorney general and the comptroller review any sale of state - owned land when a public sale or auction is not required.

She's introduced legislation that would require the State Comptroller to review and analyze the privatization of any public transit systems, such as the 2012 transfer of Nassau County's bus service to a private operator, and has been an advocate for safety improvements on the Southern State Parkway.

He issued a message of necessity that suspended the three days» public review required by the constitution.

Cable identified public sector pensions as one area that required review.

The owners of the Milwaukee Bucks next week will review design possibilities for a new arena, a project that co-owner Marc Lasry said will require public money.

When Como announced the review of the Comcast / Time Warner in May, he emphasized that recent legislation he had signed had shifted the burden of proof to require the company to prove that the merger was in the public interest, whereas previously the Commission «was required to grant its approval unless it found that the transaction was not in the public interest,» the press release noted.

Bergman and the others want Nike's certificate of occupancy revoked until they and the developer apply for the special permit required for retail larger than 10,000 square feet, which would entail public review and oversight.

Promulgate an amendment to Part 54 and any other relevant regulations, which exclude seismicity analysis from the scope of safety review in relicensing proceedings, to specifically require the preparation of a public site - specific seismic analysis for the Indian Point and other reactors;

The proposal contained in Cuomo's budget plan would require local government leaders on the county level to convene a review of ways to share services on the municipal level, with a plan that would be voted on in a public referendum by November.

Republican Assemblyman Jim Tedisco introduced a bill this year that would require grant recipients to be clearly outlined in the state budget, with a period of at least three days for public review.

And government watchdog groups pointed out that by skipping the legally required three - day public review period — which the governor circumvented this week with messages of necessity — the budget skidded past the deadline by days, not hours.

The order requires all New York State agencies, departments, boards and commissions to immediately review all requests for state funded or state sponsored travel to the state of Mississippi, and bar any such publicly funded travel that is not essential to the enforcement of state law or public health and safety.

One common concern expressed is how a required state environmental review, which can involve a lengthy public comment period, will fit in with the process.

The zoning text amendment would require a full public review, and approval by the City Council.

If an agency or public authority wants to bid out a contract requiring less than 30 percent MWBE participation, the request for proposal must be forwarded to the Executive Chamber for review, and include documentation justifying a lower goal.

The state constitution requires bills to age three days before they are voted on in order to facilitate public review, but Cuomo, like many governors before him, has taken to issuing «messages of necessity» to bypass the otherwise - mandated waiting period.

Another measure, proposed by Councilman Daniel Dromm, also a Queens Democrat, would require public schools to post their cafeteria inspection reports online for parents and students to review.

The proposed amendment establishes a redistricting commission every 10 years beginning in 2020, with two members appointed by each of the four legislative leaders and two members selected by the eight legislative appointees; prohibits legislators and other elected officials from serving as commissioners; establishes principles to be used in creating districts; requires the commission to hold public hearings on proposed redistricting plans; subjects the commission's redistricting plan to legislative enactment; provides that the legislature may only amend the redistricting plan according to the established principles if the commission's plan is rejected twice by the legislature; provides for expedited court review of a challenged redistricting plan; and provides for funding and bipartisan staff to work for the commission.

When all required information has been satisfactorily submitted and reviewed, and the Public Hearing held, the Planning Board will be in a position to render a decision on the application.

That would allow them to comply with a three - day waiting period, required by the State Constitution, to allow the public and lawmakers to review the language of legislation before it is voted upon.

At a recent Community Education Council meeting, Jamie Smarr, executive director of the DOE's Educational Construction Fund, reassured parents that the sale of the schools would be subject to public review under the Uniform Land Use Review Process (ULURP), which requires a vote by the City Coreview under the Uniform Land Use Review Process (ULURP), which requires a vote by the City CoReview Process (ULURP), which requires a vote by the City Council.

Under the proposed law, any changes to a deed restriction on a property will be reviewed by the Citywide Administrative Services, which will be required to run a land - use study with the Department of City Planning, consult local officials and hold a public hearing.

► «Last month, the National Science Foundation unveiled a plan to require its grantees to make their peer - reviewed research papers freely available to the public within 12 months of publication,» wrote Jocelyn Kaiser in this week's Science.

► Later, at ScienceInsider, Jocelyn Kaiser reported that «[o] pen - access advocates are heralding a Senate panel's approval [that day] of» the Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act, which «would require U.S. science agencies to make the peer - reviewed research papers they fund freely available to the public.

The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), which has identical versions in the House of Representatives and the Senate, would expand to other research agencies the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) 4 - year - old policy requiring investigators it funds to submit copies of their peer - reviewed manuscripts for posting in a public datPublic Access Act (FRPAA), which has identical versions in the House of Representatives and the Senate, would expand to other research agencies the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) 4 - year - old policy requiring investigators it funds to submit copies of their peer - reviewed manuscripts for posting in a public datpublic database.

In a victory for open access advocates, two U.S. lawmakers yesterday dropped a bill that would have banned the National Institutes of Health from requiring that its researchers submit their peer - reviewed manuscripts to a public archive.

-- After reviewing the report required by subsection (a), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in concurrence with the Secretary of Agriculture, may, by regulation and after public notice and comment, modify the non-Federal lands portion of the definition of «renewable biomass» in section 610 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 in order to advance the goals of increasing America's energy independence, protecting the environment, and reducing global warming pollpublic notice and comment, modify the non-Federal lands portion of the definition of «renewable biomass» in section 610 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 in order to advance the goals of increasing America's energy independence, protecting the environment, and reducing global warming pollPublic Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 in order to advance the goals of increasing America's energy independence, protecting the environment, and reducing global warming pollution.

Federal courts have played a key role in the development of special education policy by interpreting what Congress wrote in IDEA three decades ago, and the Supreme Court is reviewing what the law means by a «free appropriate public education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special Education» legal beat, Summer 2017).

The bill would require four regional town hall - style meetings on the issue, and the public would also be allowed to participate in the review through an «online review and comment platform.»

The following year a law was enacted requiring the Governing Board's performance levels to be labelled «on a developmental basis,» until such time as an independent review by an organization such as the NAE or the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) found them to be reasonable, valid, and informative to the public (6).

Require that there will be annual performance reviews of public charter schools created under this measure, and that the performance of these schools be evaluated to determine whether additional public charter schools should be allowed;

Collective impact, as defined by Kania and Kramer in the Stanford Social Innovation Review, is the concept that large - scale social change requires broad cross-sector coordination of nonprofits, governments, businesses, and the public around a common agenda to create a collective impact.

If a student transfers into a Florida public high school from out of country, out of state, a private school or a home school, the student's transcript is reviewed to determine if the student is required to take a Florida end - of - course (EOC) assessment in accordance with Rule 6A - 1.09941, F.A.C., State Uniform Transfer of Students in Middle Grades and High School.

, and Public Act 25 all require a continuous review of data, processes and supports to help insure continuous progress.

The bill being circulated for sponsors by Rep. Dean Knudson, R - Hudson, would require the state Department of Public Instruction to review academic standards every six years on a rotating basis.

Under R - 55, charter public schools will be voted on by local school boards who are required to hold public hearings to review applications.

Walker's positions contradict a Senate bill's proposal to create two new review boards — one for public and charter schools and one for private voucher schools — and also a provision in the Assembly's version that would require persistently low - performing public schools be turned into charter schools.