Critics of disparate impact have long pointed out that the doctrine actually compels discrimination, since remedying any disparities caused by neutral policies
requires racial quotas and classifications.
Not exact matches
One wonders: do the authors of the Platform themselves agree about whether the «dignity of all persons» is offended by abortion, whether
racial quotas honor or violate the principle that «discrimination is abhorrent,» or whether the virtue of «tolerance»
requires putting up with obscenity in the music of rock and rap?
Rectifying disparities caused by neutral policies forces the government to impose
racial classifications and
quotas that
require intentional discrimination against other citizens.
States would now be
required to use a standard methodology for comparing
racial and ethnic groups and to use
quota - like «reasonable thresholds» allowed by the Department for determining when minorities are over-represented.