Show me ONE law that
requires religious bodies to do that.
Not exact matches
Although it would be foolish to demarcate too rigidly cultic and other depictions of the emperor, as in some way all imperial ideology was pervaded by
religious conceptualizations of the imperial figure, the emperor was more than the cult, and imperial ideology was embodied in other forms and practices, many of which still
require extensive examination (for example, its significance in the ideological construction of gender in the empire, and particularly of the
body, is only just becoming visible).
Sponsoring
religious bodies expect and sometimes
require them to accept marginal students.
It is only slight exaggeration to state that he feels the traditional Western
religious and philosophical understanding of God to be such a mass of errors and inconsistencies as to
require removal in toto from the
body of metaphysical thought.
The most important of these is that a
religious body doesn't have the right, simply because it may be in the majority or be better organized than other groups, to bind its specifically
religious doctrines upon others or to
require that others help pay for the propagation of those doctrines.
«For the European court of human rights to compel a
religious body or its adherents to conduct a
religious marriage of a same - sex couple would
require a legal miracle much greater than the parting of the Red Sea,» he said.
In our 2015 regulatory round - up (here), we described the ongoing dispute arising in the Trinity Western cases, where three professional regulatory
bodies — law societies in three provinces (B.C., Ontario and Nova Scotia)-- refused to accredit a
religious university which
required that students sign a «community covenant»
requiring that they abstain from sexual intimacy outside of marriage between one man and one woman.
Mike Fox describes a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was
required by her
religious beliefs as a member of the Church of
Body Modification.»
AB 1964 expands current law to
require accommodation of «
religious dress practices» and «
religious grooming practices,» broadly defined to include head or face coverings, jewelry, the wearing or carrying of
religious clothing, and the wearing of all forms of head, facial and
body hair in the observance of the employee's religion.