Not exact matches
«(a) CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN APPROPRIATE CASES - Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary and except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), each district court shall, by local rule adopted under section 2071 (a),
require that
litigants in all
civil cases consider the use of an alternative dispute resolution process at an appropriate stage in the litigation.
Perhaps what I should have said is something to the effect that «at present, in most personal
civil disputes, legal representation is not
required nor compellable over a
litigant's objections.»
At issue is the constitutionality of the «hearing fees» which British Columbia
requires a
litigant setting a
civil case down for trial to undertake to pay.