Sentences with phrase «requiring rich countries»

This is meaningless without requiring rich countries to cut their emissions drastically and provide finance in line with their fair share, and places the extra burden on developing countries.

It seems that raising the $ 100 billion will require the richer countries to transfer funds from their general revenues, as some countries are pledging to do in Paris.

Not exact matches

A sustained struggle is required against the globally organized power of the TNCs, the rich countries, the WB, IMF, WTO and the collaborative local elites.

In fact, I'll tell you why Search I found a lot of suffering long about the prohibitive costs of marriage to set up a wedding in the Arab countries, for example, In fact, required punishment severely and configure large fortune, it comes adequate housing and does not come all this only function respectable then preferably a good car and then the time comes to wedding where they are paid a large sum of money price starts from $ 1700 even sometimes up to in some areas to 100,000, $ and of course this price is only paid by VIPs and the rich to highlight the extent of the physical capacity only...

Cash is king in this oil rich country, and staying at this hotel will require you to drop a few G's in order to say you're one of the few who stayed there overnight.

Europapier has a rich heritage, distributing paper for over 40 years across more than 13 European countries — therefore the project required great skill and attention to detail.

The article cites a draft two - page text circulated at the meeting, which appears to indicate movement toward long - term (2050) and near - term (2020) steps to curb emissions of greenhouse gases — although with all of the soft language required to get both developing and rich countries on board.

The problem is, to get the legislation passed will require compromises aimed at protecting the economies of manufacturing and coal states, and to get a climate treaty negotiated will require measures guaranteeing that rich countries move first to cut emissions.

Action on climate change is required across all countries, and it need not cap the aspirations for growth of rich or poor countries.

They conclude that «an optimal climate treaty... could well require side payments» not to poor countries, but «to rich countries like the United States» (86).

To solve this problem, Stiglitz (along with many other top climate experts) points out that a global price commitment would exert an identical pressure to reduce emission without requiring poor countries to emit less than rich countries.

This will require urgent and *** unprecedented levels of support — the UNEP Adaptation Gap Report indicates that the global cost of adaptation could be as much as *** $ 200 or $ 300 billion per year by 2050 — but it is right that the rich countries responsible for the problem help to protect the culture, heritage and identity of the most vulnerable communities and countries... Q: What should EU governments be doing about it?

If all that was required for prosperity was growing populations, the Philippines and many African countries would be rich, not poor.

A range of mitigation and adaptation efforts are required, including changes in lifestyle and unsustainable consumption patterns mainly in the rich, developed countries that have accumulated an ecological debt to poor communities in the global South.

With emissions trading, the net cost to the world would be much smaller, but Lomborg says this is politically infeasible because it would require big transfers from rich to poor countries.

Every year, one of the projects I give my students is to figure out how the global community can address the climate risk, given that it requires concerted global action, that some countries cause more emissions per capita than others, that some are endowed with abundant fossil fuel resources, and that some are richer than others.

Averting climate catastrophe and ecological collapse is going to require that rich countries right - size their economies.

But every year, they produce the same answer: Action must begin immediately, rich countries must go first and poorer, lower emission countries must soon follow, even if tariffs are required to ensure compliance.

To do so with any semblance of fairness towards developing countries will require the rich and middle - income nations to do much, much better.

After presenting the main scientific data, the paper states that the challenge of climate change will require collective action, with global participation, but justice and political feasibility dictate that rich countries should provide leadership and move first.

In addition to their enthusiasm for technology, the ecomodernists are different from many other greens in their forceful rejection of the Malthusian argument that we must limit economic growth, recognizing that environmental policies that require curtailing economic growth are politically impractical in rich countries, and are both impractical and morally unjustifiable in poor countries.

«Every one of these resource - rich Latin American countries could meet all of their needs with renewables,» Miesen said, though most «require major new transmission.»

Instead, a range of mitigation efforts are required, including changes in lifestyle and unsustainable consumption patterns in the rich, developed countries.

The richest one - fifth of the population, including wealthy minorities in poor countries consume energy and resources at a rate that providing a comparable lifestyle to the rest of the world's population would require the resources of four planets the size of Earth.