After explaining why the simple conversion of research into public law is unlikely, several factors are identified that can promote the use of
research by public officials.
Not exact matches
The lines were proposed
by the state Legislative Task Force on Demographic
Research and Reapportionment, a body comprised of elected
officials and members of the
public selected
by elected
officials.
In a letter published online today
by Science and Nature, 40 researchers declare that the studies should restart now that scientists, government
officials, and the
public have had time to debate the need for the
research and impose new safety measures.»
It presents the first
research on the impact of
public officials» corruption on spending
by U.S. states.
Borrowing from the «Charter School Messaging Notebook» and
public school messaging
research conducted in North Carolina
by the Neimand Collaborative, here are some suggested sound bites for
public school
officials:
Climate Science Watch: Climate Science Watch is a non-profit
public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding
public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related
research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed
by global warming and climate change.
White House and Climate Change Science Program
officials have never offered an honest
public explanation of why the terms of that dismissal would have legally required (as distinct from an unofficial, secret political agreement) that the White House and the federal agencies suppress a taxpayer - funded, scientifically based assessment sponsored
by the federal global change
research program, even for purposes of using it as a scientific document or in program planning for
research and future assessments.
> Rick Piltz > Director, Climate Science Watch > 301-807-2472 > http://www.climatesciencewatch.org > > Climate Science Watch is a sponsored project of the Government > Accountability Project, Washington, DC, dedicated to holding
public >
officials accountable for using climate science and related
research > effectively and with integrity in responding to the challenges posed >
by global climate disruption.
According to Climate Depot, the» talking points memo -LSB-...] is a complete skeptics» guide for elected
officials, media and the
public on how to discuss global warming backed up
by dozens of citations to peer - reviewed
research.»
Finally, and this is a big issue that I'll only touch on here — I'm not sure to what extent the proper role of the social sciences is to do
research that is user - needs - driven
by public officials and designed to help «decisionmakers» solve problems.
A peer - reviewed study will be published in Environmental
Research Letters, a report issued in layman's terms for consumption
by the
public, business, and government
officials, and, finally, an interactive web - based map will be deployed to more effectively communicate key findings.
Here's a
Public Notice advertisement that appeared in some newspaper [probably in the State of Oregon] that gave
official notice of what was going to happen, i.e., Water Development Corporation had a license (No. 54 issued
by the State of Oregon) «to engage in operations to modify natural precipitation
by artificial means, for and on behalf of Morrow County Weather
Research Association, located at Echo, Oregon» for the period Oct. 1, 1965 to Oct. 31, 1966.
As a result of this selfish misleading of
public officials and the general
public by many in the climate change
research community, valuable resources get mis - used
by political bodies trying to prioritize and solve the many different problems they are facing.
The National
Research Council recently reported that «the Internet has great potential to improve Americans» health
by enhancing communications and improving access to information for care providers, patients, health plan administrators,
public health
officials, biomedical researchers, and other health professionals.»
Championed the role of an Internal Processing Auditor (IPA) Quality Control Coordinator reviewed the auditors findings and proposals and the analyses prepared
by the financial, facilities and
public housing analysts to ensure all the recommendations were satisfied and supported
by the appropriate documentation; Carried out environmental reviews on suggested activities; performed work in accordance with HUD Form 4128,
researched property information and location details, FEMA maps, surrounding property characteristics, historical data to ensure all proposed activities were in compliance with environmental regulations; recognized non-categorical and categorical activities in order to determine the appropriate type of review, in accordance with HUD regulations; prepared
official communication to
public housing authorities.
More importantly, the suit concerned only one person named in the article (out of many other stories and discussions of
research), who was determined
by the judge to be a private individual rather than a
public official, and therefore allowed to prove libel without meeting the standard (malice) required for
public figures.