The trend seems clear, but the authors did admit that» [w] e can not exclude the possibility that females commit
research misconduct as frequently as males but are less likely to be detected.»
Not exact matches
But,
research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) shows that this sort of misconduct has most often been carried out by fighters who viewed the enemy as racially different from themselves and used images of the hunt to describe their
research funded by the Economic and Social
Research Council (ESRC) shows that this sort of misconduct has most often been carried out by fighters who viewed the enemy as racially different from themselves and used images of the hunt to describe their
Research Council (ESRC) shows that this sort of
misconduct has most often been carried out by fighters who viewed the enemy
as racially different from themselves and used images of the hunt to describe their actions.
We rely upon our full - time staff of attorneys, forensic accountants,
research analysts, field investigators and computer forensics experts to staff these assignments, and we work collaboratively with our business clients to develop an investigative plan that is appropriate to the suspected
misconduct... Since most of our investigative professionals have had experience in federal, state and local law enforcement —
as prosecutors, auditors and agents — our investigative strategies are developed with an understanding of the evidence that may be needed to support an eventual criminal prosecution.»
Often this means expanding the definition of «
misconduct» in these guidelines, to move beyond
research issues such
as falsification of data or plagiarism to include professional
misconduct such
as harassment.
• Those who think the toll of scientific
misconduct is limited to science should read a paper in the European Heart Journal (EHJ) that claims that tainted
research from the labs of Don Poldermans, the «disgraced cardiologist who was at Erasmus MC in the Netherlands, may have led to the deaths of»
as many
as 800,000 people in Europe.
The Program has engaged in a number of projects to promote
research integrity and ethic,
as well
as focused on
research misconduct.
The report is replete with examples of the social controversies involving science and technology at that time - the biological and environmental effects of nuclear weapons testing, DDT and other dioxins, the use of defoliants and herbicides by the U.S. military in Vietnam, the safety of nuclear power plants, the ban on fetal
research, a moratorium on recombinant DNA
research, the need for human subject protections and informed consent in genetics
research, the misuse of psychology
as a tool for torture, the implications of national security controls on science;
misconduct in science, and the role of and protections for whistleblowers - many of which continue to resonate in the science and society relationship of today.
She denies changing data and wanted a panel of competent and impartial scientific experts to examine the evidence, but the relevant UW unit, then known
as the Office of Scholarly Integrity (OSI) and now called the Office of
Research Misconduct Proceedings, did not investigate the case.
The interests of the CSFR and the NCLS aligned well on many SFRL projects, conferences, publications, and AAAS annual meeting symposia such
as on the ethical and legal implications of genetic testing; use of animals in
research and education; scientific
misconduct and
research integrity; use of scientific and technical information in the courts; ethical and legal aspects of computer network use and abuse; effects of national security controls on unclassified
research, and the impact of neuroscience on the legal system.
The play is Othello, but he could just
as well have been writing about science, where reputation is, in the words of the University of Washington's (UW's) policy on
research misconduct, «of paramount importance to a researcher's career.»
For all authors, the citation penalty was greater when the retraction was due to
misconduct as opposed to an honest mistake — a result that makes sense to David Resnik, a bioethicist at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (which publishes Science) says sanctions should move with an individual,
as they now do for
research misconduct.
Rather than rely just on retraction notices from journals — which in some cases they couldn't access without paying a fee, Casadevall says — they cross-referenced
as many retractions
as they could with other sources, including reports from the U.S. Office of
Research Integrity (ORI), which investigates scientific
misconduct.
The types and development of institutional initiatives to handle
research misconduct, including consideration of legal issues, such
as confidentiality during investigations; and
Nick Steneck, director of
research ethics and integrity at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, says authorities worldwide should adopt a uniform
misconduct policy that provides clear guidance not only on data falsification and fabrication but also on lesser ethical breaches — such
as self - plagiarism.
That quasi-independent office now investigates waste, fraud, and abuse of NSF funds,
as well
as investigating allegations of
research misconduct.
However, it is well appreciated by all that responsible conduct,
as opposed to
misconduct, encompasses many other aspects of ethical behavior in the practice of scientific
research.
As explained in the most detailed account of Wakefield's grotesque misconduct, it rested on the findings (as the BMJ noted) that Wakefield concealed and manipulated the terms of the research study, secretly conducted for a lawsuit, and that not one of the children was reported upon truthfull
As explained in the most detailed account of Wakefield's grotesque
misconduct, it rested on the findings (
as the BMJ noted) that Wakefield concealed and manipulated the terms of the research study, secretly conducted for a lawsuit, and that not one of the children was reported upon truthfull
as the BMJ noted) that Wakefield concealed and manipulated the terms of the
research study, secretly conducted for a lawsuit, and that not one of the children was reported upon truthfully.
notify CRUK at the earliest opportunity of any allegations of
research misconduct connected in any way with the Grant or Grant Activities,
as well
as the progress and outcome of any ensuing investigation into the
misconduct.
As you note, a simple perusal of the ORI website will clearly show the consequences of
research misconduct findings.
Here's a fairly typical (if narrow) definition of scientific
misconduct, taken from the US DHSS Office of
Research Integrity's (ORI) website,
as is the second quotation below).
at xv, it treats the falsification of data, intent to mislead, and retaliation against critics
as examples of serious
research misconduct.
«I document the gross misrepresentation of the findings of a recent scientific paper via press release which appears to skirt awfully close to crossing the line into
research misconduct,
as defined by the NRC.»
However, here I document the gross misrepresentation of the findings of a recent scientific paper via press release which appears to skirt awfully close to crossing the line into
research misconduct,
as defined by the NRC.
The reason for having Dr. Pell examine the matter was that the accusations, when placed in an academic context, could be construed
as allegations of
research misconduct, which would constitute a violation of Penn State policy,
Tagged
as: AGW, anthropogenic global warming, climate change, climate disruption, climategate, ClimaTweet, CRU, Environment and Public Works Committee, global warming, James Inhofe, Matt Dempsey, Michael Mann, National Science Foundation, NSF, NSF - Mann series, office of inspector general, Office of Management of the Budget, OMB, Penn State, Pennyslviania State University, PSU,
research misconduct, Senate
Misconduct in science is defined
as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism, in proposing, performing, or reporting
research.
Research misconduct is a form of scientific and scholarly
misconduct identified
as an inappropriate activity in the Faculty Code, Chapter 25, Section 25 - 51.
The Hospital had a
research policy which defined «
research misconduct»
as including falsification, fabrication and material non-compliance with accepted standards and regulations.
HAMALENGWA — Findings of Professional
Misconduct — While representing a difficult client who was charged with first degree murder, the Lawyer was eligible to bill the Ministry of the Attorney General for fees and disbursements pursuant to a Fisher order — The Lawyer's accounting, billing and docketing systems were deplorable and bore no relationship to his billings to the Ministry — The Lawyer engaged in professional misconduct by billing the Ministry for attendances at court when he had not attended or attended for less time than he claimed; overbilling for legal research; billing for services that were not properly billable as legal services; overbilling for student assistance disbursements he had not incurred; overbilling for fees and disbursements that were not fair and reasonable; and submitting a document to the Ministry purporting to be an invoice from a student working under his direction when the invoice was not prepared by the student and the services were not rendered as described in the
Misconduct — While representing a difficult client who was charged with first degree murder, the Lawyer was eligible to bill the Ministry of the Attorney General for fees and disbursements pursuant to a Fisher order — The Lawyer's accounting, billing and docketing systems were deplorable and bore no relationship to his billings to the Ministry — The Lawyer engaged in professional
misconduct by billing the Ministry for attendances at court when he had not attended or attended for less time than he claimed; overbilling for legal research; billing for services that were not properly billable as legal services; overbilling for student assistance disbursements he had not incurred; overbilling for fees and disbursements that were not fair and reasonable; and submitting a document to the Ministry purporting to be an invoice from a student working under his direction when the invoice was not prepared by the student and the services were not rendered as described in the
misconduct by billing the Ministry for attendances at court when he had not attended or attended for less time than he claimed; overbilling for legal
research; billing for services that were not properly billable
as legal services; overbilling for student assistance disbursements he had not incurred; overbilling for fees and disbursements that were not fair and reasonable; and submitting a document to the Ministry purporting to be an invoice from a student working under his direction when the invoice was not prepared by the student and the services were not rendered
as described in the document.