Sentences with phrase «research misconduct by»

Introduction On 1 April 2014 the Bishop Hill blog carried a guest post «Dating error» by Doug Keenan, in which he set out his allegations of research misconduct by Oxford University professor Christopher Bronk Ramsey.

It's just another piece to the mountainous pile of evidence of research misconduct by the Team.

On 1 April 2014 the Bishop Hill blog carried a guest post «Dating error» by Doug Keenan, in which he set out his allegations of research misconduct by Oxford University professor Christopher Bronk Ramsey.

The climate scientist Michael Mann, who has been under relentless attack from sceptics since the exposure of emails at East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit, was cleared of research misconduct by a university investigation yesterday.

The climate scientist at the center of Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's UVA document - seeking inquest has been cleared of research misconduct by a faculty panel at Penn State, the University...

The National Science Foundation has found no evidence of research misconduct by Michael Mann, the Pennsylvania State University climatologist who has faced waves of attacks from foes of action to curb greenhouse gases.

Update on Macchiarini's investigation Karolinska University Hospital, which investigated ethical research misconduct by tissue engineering pioneer Paolo Macchiarini, has released report this week.

We are pleased with the finding of research misconduct by the federal Office of Research Integrity related to work done by Dr. Anil Potti.

► In April, we reported that stem cell scientist Haruko Obokata (the lead author of the two STAP — stimulus - triggered acquisition of pluripotency — papers in Nature) was found guilty of research misconduct by a RIKEN investigating committee.

Not exact matches

A joint investigation conducted by the State University of New York and the SUNY Research Foundation «found fraud and misconduct» by staff in a Buffalo State College graduate program, according to newly revealed correspondence between the campus president and the state inspector general obtained by The Alt through a Freedom of Information Law request.

But, research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) shows that this sort of misconduct has most often been carried out by fighters who viewed the enemy as racially different from themselves and used images of the hunt to describe their research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) shows that this sort of misconduct has most often been carried out by fighters who viewed the enemy as racially different from themselves and used images of the hunt to describe their Research Council (ESRC) shows that this sort of misconduct has most often been carried out by fighters who viewed the enemy as racially different from themselves and used images of the hunt to describe their actions.

A joint investigation conducted by SUNY and the SUNY Research Foundation «found fraud and misconduct» by staff in a Buffalo State College graduate program, according to newly revealed correspondence between the campus president and the state inspector general obtained by The Alt.

► Last year, we pointed to a ScienceInsider post by Kelly Servick that detailed the story of Fazlul Sarkar, a researcher who sued anonymous posters on PubPeer after claiming «that anonymous comments suggesting misconduct in his research caused [the University of Mississippi] to revoke its [job] offer.»

Ferric Fang of the University of Washington, Seattle; Joan Bennett of Rutgers University; and Arturo Casadevall of Albert Einstein College of Medicine combed through misconduct reports on 228 people released by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) over the last 19 years.

The report is replete with examples of the social controversies involving science and technology at that time - the biological and environmental effects of nuclear weapons testing, DDT and other dioxins, the use of defoliants and herbicides by the U.S. military in Vietnam, the safety of nuclear power plants, the ban on fetal research, a moratorium on recombinant DNA research, the need for human subject protections and informed consent in genetics research, the misuse of psychology as a tool for torture, the implications of national security controls on science; misconduct in science, and the role of and protections for whistleblowers - many of which continue to resonate in the science and society relationship of today.

The company said it learned about «misconduct at a contract research organization (CRO) facility in Houston» from the FDA and that it cooperated with investigations by the FDA and its European counterpart.

Lee hopes others will continue to investigate whether the new approach — which has been dogged by claims of research misconduct — can really lead to stem cells.

Pellegrino also related sentiments held by scientists who believe that because those who commit scientific fraud and research misconduct are in the minority, it is unnecessary to «change everything» for that small segment of the community.

The university has not censured Croce, but school officials, stung by the article, hired a law firm to conduct a review of how the institution dealt with allegations of research misconduct, including those against Croce.

The expertise needed to investigate research misconduct cases is very different than investigating sexual harassment cases, says Price, who spent 17 years at the Office of Research Integrity, which handles misconduct by federally funded biomedical reseresearch misconduct cases is very different than investigating sexual harassment cases, says Price, who spent 17 years at the Office of Research Integrity, which handles misconduct by federally funded biomedical reseResearch Integrity, which handles misconduct by federally funded biomedical researchers.

I feel sorry for Haruko Obokata, who has been found guilty of misconduct by her research institute in Japan (19 April, p 7).

I feel sorry for Haruko Obokata, who has been found guilty of misconduct by her research institute in Japan (19...

On 7 December, Uppsala University in Sweden released a long - awaited report by its Board for Investigation of Misconduct in Research, which investigated a high - profile paper about the effects of microplastics on fish, published in Science in June 2016.

In the report released yesterday, ORI identified six instances in which Hauser engaged in research misconduct in research funded by the National Institutes of Health.

The government's Office of Research Integrity had earlier found Popovic guilty of «relatively minor» misconduct based on what the appeals board called a «handful of words and notations... in one heavily edited paper written by a scientist with limited English skills during a volatile period of scientific discovery a decade ago».

Something all can agree on, however, is that misconduct in the United Kingdom, particularly in the area of medical research, is an endemic problem: An informal survey released by BMJ at the meeting showed that out of 2700 responses by BMJ subscribers, 13 % of medical and academic researchers had witnessed misconduct and 6 % were aware of possible research misconduct at their institution that hadn't been properly investigated.

Koziol claims that «Yale broke its contract with her by failing to report her case to the Office of Research Integrity (ORI), the U.S. agency that investigates misconduct in federally funded biomedical researchResearch Integrity (ORI), the U.S. agency that investigates misconduct in federally funded biomedical researchresearch.»

Anil Potti, M.D., Duke University School of Medicine: Based on the reports of investigations conducted by Duke University School of Medicine (Duke) and additional analysis conducted by ORI in its oversight review, ORI found that Dr. Anil Potti, former Associate Professor of Medicine, Duke, engaged in research misconduct in research supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 HL072208 and National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, grants R01 CA136530, R01 CA131049, K12 CA100639, R01 CA106520, and U54 CA112952.

However, it is well appreciated by all that responsible conduct, as opposed to misconduct, encompasses many other aspects of ethical behavior in the practice of scientific research.

The full quote:» Three investigations of the alleged scientific misconduct of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — one by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, a second by the Scientific Assessment Panel of the Royal Society, chaired by Lord Oxburgh, and the latest by the Independent Climate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their colleagues.

Ensuring the quality, trustworthiness and the reproducibility of our research by upholding high standards of integrity, providing educational and training programmes on the responsible conduct of research, and pursuing allegations of research misconduct

Research misconduct (RM) is a breach of OSR standards and of those expected by OSR funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed in OSR by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for research integrity (RI) and accurate and experimentally - supported communResearch misconduct (RM) is a breach of OSR standards and of those expected by OSR funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed in OSR by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for research integrity (RI) and accurate and experimentally - supported communresearch integrity (RI) and accurate and experimentally - supported communication.

Research misconduct is a breach of Ospedale San Raffaele standards and of those expected from its funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed in Ospedale San Raffaele by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for research integrity and accurate and experimentally - supported communResearch misconduct is a breach of Ospedale San Raffaele standards and of those expected from its funders and sponsors, a betrayal of the trust placed in Ospedale San Raffaele by the public, and the failure to comply with the high expectations of the scholarly community for research integrity and accurate and experimentally - supported communresearch integrity and accurate and experimentally - supported communication.

McIntyre's piece was nothing more than a deeply offensive attempt to smear an inquiry into unfounded, politically - motivated accusations of research misconduct, by equating that inquiry / investigation with a completely unrelated coverup of sexual abuse.

The charge of the newly established Research Integrity Office (RIO) is to ensure the quality, trustworthiness and reproducibility of our research by upholding high standards of integrity and quality in science, and vigorously pursuing all substantiated allegations of research misconduct while protecting our community from unsubstantiatResearch Integrity Office (RIO) is to ensure the quality, trustworthiness and reproducibility of our research by upholding high standards of integrity and quality in science, and vigorously pursuing all substantiated allegations of research misconduct while protecting our community from unsubstantiatresearch by upholding high standards of integrity and quality in science, and vigorously pursuing all substantiated allegations of research misconduct while protecting our community from unsubstantiatresearch misconduct while protecting our community from unsubstantiated ones.

Current investigations of research experiments by a surgeon, Dr. Paolo Macciarini, are active for allegations of misconduct at the Karolinska Institute, the most prominent medical research center in Sweden.

An investigation related to this research has been conducted by the Expert Group for Misconduct in Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Insresearch has been conducted by the Expert Group for Misconduct in Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska InsResearch at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Institutet.

Just a few months ago, after almost 2 years of investigations by institutions and governmental bodies, an expert panel in Japan finished their deliberations and issued a final verdict that Dr. Obokata was guilty of research misconduct [3,4].

If a complainant who has reported possible research misconduct alleges retaliation on the part of DOT organization management, the report will be addressed by management officials who will conduct an inquiry into the allegations followed by an appropriate management action.

It is also clear that the original widely publicised complaint to the NHMRC and AHPRA alleging professional and research misconduct, was done for precisely the same reasons by those within public health and wind industry circles in Australia who were unhappy with the attention the issue of health damage from wind turbine noise was attracting.

It did not address, or even acknowledge, the fact that Dr. Mann's research has been extensively reviewed by a number of independent parties, including the National Science Foundation, with never a suggestion of any fraud or research misconduct.

Thus, those who have big research fiefdoms, are prolific publishers and win many awards have the most to gain by misconduct.

Based on the findings of an investigation by Columbia University (CU) and additional analysis conducted by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI found that Bengu Sezen, former graduate student, Department of Chemistry, CU, engaged in misconduct in science in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI found that Bengu Sezen, former graduate student, Department of Chemistry, CU, engaged in misconduct in science in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 GM60326.

By the way, McIntyre did bring a research misconduct complaint against Caspar Ammann at UCAR (which was rejected, of course).

Generally, the ORI handles the details, sort of by default, but will work with these other agencies in the case that the PI is found to have committed research misconduct with respect to sanctions.

A further line of attack involves complaints by members of the public to scientists» host institutions with allegations of research misconduct.

«I document the gross misrepresentation of the findings of a recent scientific paper via press release which appears to skirt awfully close to crossing the line into research misconduct, as defined by the NRC.»

However, here I document the gross misrepresentation of the findings of a recent scientific paper via press release which appears to skirt awfully close to crossing the line into research misconduct, as defined by the NRC.

After careful review of the evidence and thoughtful deliberation, the Investigation Committee finds no evidence of the alleged fabrication of results and nothing that rises to the level of research misconduct having been committed by Dr Wang.

In August 2011, the National Science Foundation concluded «Finding no research misconduct or other matter raised by the various regulations and laws discussed above, this case is closed».