Sentences with phrase «research misconduct investigations»
2) Managing research misconduct investigations Presenter: Kerry Rehn, University of Sydney, Australia
http://www.researchintegrity.org/ Not exact matches
A joint investigation conducted by the State University of New York and the SUNY Research Foundation «found fraud and misconduct» by staff in a Buffalo State College graduate program, according to newly revealed correspondence between the campus president and the state inspector general obtained by The Alt through a Freedom of Information Law request.
A joint investigation conducted by SUNY and the SUNY Research Foundation «found fraud and misconduct» by staff in a Buffalo State College graduate program, according to newly revealed correspondence between the campus president and the state inspector general obtained by The Alt.
► «The involvement of [online communities in discussions about suspect publications and possible research misconduct] has made the standardization of processes to address allegations more complex and has led to less patience from the scientific community and the public with what are often long timelines in institutional misconduct investigations,» Science journals Editor - in - Chief Marcia McNutt wrote in an editorial in this week's issue of Science.
Working under the vice president for research, he oversaw programs for the responsible conduct of research and assisted with misconduct investigations.
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) provides oversight for investigations of misconduct in research conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Public Health Research Integrity (ORI) provides oversight for investigations of misconduct in research conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Public Health research conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Public Health Service.
«Lacking any direct evidence of research misconduct,... we are closing this investigation with no further action.»
The National Science Foundation has closed its investigation into Pennsylvania State University climatologist Michael Mann after finding no evidence of scientific misconduct related to his research.
The story got weird last week when we learned that Shunsuke Ishii, the chair of the RIKEN investigating committee that found Obokata guilty of research misconduct, is also under investigation for research misconduct.
The company said it learned about «misconduct at a contract research organization (CRO) facility in Houston» from the FDA and that it cooperated with investigations by the FDA and its European counterpart.
On Thursday Normile reported that RIKEN will conduct a new misconduct investigation related to the research reported in those papers.
The Boston Globe reports today that Harvard University cognitive scientist Marc Hauser, who is on leave after a university investigation found evidence of research misconduct in his lab, will not be allowed to teach at the university next year.
On 7 December, Uppsala University in Sweden released a long - awaited report by its Board for Investigation of Misconduct in Research, which investigated a high - profile paper about the effects of microplastics on fish, published in Science in June 2016.
Hauser, who resigned from his Harvard faculty position in 2011 after an internal investigation found him responsible for research misconduct, wrote in a statement that although he has «fundamental differences» with some of the new report's findings, «I acknowledge that I made mistakes.»
TOKYO — RIKEN has decided against reopening an investigation into two stem cell papers that concluded that the lead author, Haruko Obokata of RIKEN's Center for Developmental Biology in Kobe, engaged in research misconduct.
The investigating committee concluded that there had been «inappropriate handling of data» for two of the items under investigation, but these were «not judged to constitute research misconduct,» according to a RIKEN press release.
Shunsuke Ishii, the chair of the RIKEN investigating committee that recently found stem cell scientist Haruko Obokata (first author on the Nature papers reporting the STAP results) guilty of research misconduct, is himself under investigation for research misconduct.
The panel «found substantial evidence that Kajstura may have committed research misconduct acting alone,» according to the court document, and recommended a full investigation of Anversa and Leri «on the theory that they negligently failed to investigate Kajstura's misconduct.»
She is also assistant vice president for research at CSU and directs the university's research integrity office, which offers training in research integrity and helps with misconduct investigations.
The National Science Foundation, for instance, investigates misconduct itself, whereas the Office of Research Integrity in the Department of Health and Human Services can only provide oversight of universities» investigations.
When the NSF - OIG completes an investigation and writes a report, they make a recommendation to the NSF administration, but it's the deputy director who makes the decision whether to declare a «finding» of research misconduct.
The types and development of institutional initiatives to handle research misconduct, including consideration of legal issues, such as confidentiality during investigations; and
Anil Potti, M.D., Duke University School of Medicine: Based on the reports of investigations conducted by Duke University School of Medicine (Duke) and additional analysis conducted by ORI in its oversight review, ORI found that Dr. Anil Potti, former Associate Professor of Medicine, Duke, engaged in research misconduct in research supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 HL072208 and National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH, grants R01 CA136530, R01 CA131049, K12 CA100639, R01 CA106520, and U54 CA112952.
The full quote:» Three investigations of the alleged scientific misconduct of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — one by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, a second by the Scientific Assessment Panel of the Royal Society, chaired by Lord Oxburgh, and the latest by the Independent Climate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their colleagues.
«Three investigations of the alleged scientific misconduct of the Climate Research Unit... have confirmed... established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their colleagues.
The view from Norway Presenter: Torkild Vinther, National Commission for the Investigation of Research Misconduct, Norway
Therefore, we initiated our own investigation under the NSF Research Misconduct Regulation.
Update on Macchiarini's investigation Karolinska University Hospital, which investigated ethical research misconduct by tissue engineering pioneer Paolo Macchiarini, has released report this week.
McIntyre's piece was nothing more than a deeply offensive attempt to smear an inquiry into unfounded, politically - motivated accusations of research misconduct, by equating that inquiry / investigation with a completely unrelated coverup of sexual abuse.
notify CRUK at the earliest opportunity of any allegations of research misconduct connected in any way with the Grant or Grant Activities, as well as the progress and outcome of any ensuing investigation into the misconduct.
Current investigations of research experiments by a surgeon, Dr. Paolo Macciarini, are active for allegations of misconduct at the Karolinska Institute, the most prominent medical research center in Sweden.
An investigation related to this research has been conducted by the Expert Group for Misconduct in Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Insresearch has been conducted by the Expert Group for Misconduct in Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska InsResearch at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board on behalf of Karolinska Institutet.
Just a few months ago, after almost 2 years of investigations by institutions and governmental bodies, an expert panel in Japan finished their deliberations and issued a final verdict that Dr. Obokata was guilty of research misconduct [3,4].
Complainant is the person who makes an allegation of research misconduct or the person who cooperates with an inquiry or investigation.
When the oversight organization concludes an investigation with a determination of research misconduct, the DOT Office of the Senior Procurement Executive may notify any other sources of research that provide support to the respondent.
(6) Provide the respondent (the person against whom an allegation of research misconduct has been made) with a reasonable opportunity (e.g., 30 calendar days) to review and respond to the investigation report.
(i) When the DOT oversight organization concludes an investigation with a determination of research misconduct, the DOT Office of the Senior Procurement Executive may notify any other sources of research that provide support to the respondent that a finding of research misconduct has been made.
Respondent is the person against whom an allegation of research misconduct has been made, or the person whose actions are the focus of the inquiry or investigation.
Inquiry is preliminary information gathering and fact finding to determine if an allegation, or apparent instance of research misconduct, warrants an investigation.
The second and final phase of Penn State University's investigation of allegations of research misconduct against paleoclimatologist Michael Mann has just been completed.
Based on the findings of an investigation by Columbia University (CU) and additional analysis conducted by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI found that Bengu Sezen, former graduate student, Department of Chemistry, CU, engaged in misconduct in science in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 Research Integrity (ORI) during its oversight review, ORI found that Bengu Sezen, former graduate student, Department of Chemistry, CU, engaged in misconduct in science in research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 research funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 GM60326.
Again, there was no serious investigation of prima facie case of research misconduct.
The climate scientist Michael Mann, who has been under relentless attack from sceptics since the exposure of emails at East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit, was cleared of research misconduct by a university investigation yeResearch Unit, was cleared of research misconduct by a university investigation yeresearch misconduct by a university investigation yesterday.
Some useful facts: 1) The inquiry / investigations at Penn State were handled in the normal way, under Hank Foley, VP Research, the job often responsible for academic misconduct investigations.
Therefore, we initiated our own investigation under the NSF Research Misconduct Regulation.
The foregoing procedure shall also be followed in the event that an investigatory Committee appointed in accordance with Section 5 hereof obtains information that any individual, other than the one initially under investigation, has allegedly engaged in research misconduct.
After studying the report of the Investigation Committee assessing an allegation of data fabrication levied against you and upon further weighing the recommendation of the Vice President for Research, I concur that there is no evidence whatsoever that you have committed data fabrication or any research misconduct with respect to this allResearch, I concur that there is no evidence whatsoever that you have committed data fabrication or any research misconduct with respect to this allresearch misconduct with respect to this allegation.
After careful review of the evidence and thoughtful deliberation, the Investigation Committee finds no evidence of the alleged fabrication of results and nothing that rises to the level of research misconduct having been committed by Dr Wang.
The University's misconduct policies and the Office of Research Integrity regulations preclude discussion of any information pertaining to this case with others who were not directly involved in the investigation.
The Hospital informed the applicant researchers that an investigation committee of three scientists would be investigating the allegations of research misconduct.