Not exact matches
The reconstruction produced by Dr. Mann and his colleagues was just one step in a long process of
research, and it is not (as sometimes presented) a clinching argument for
anthropogenic global warming, but rather one of many independent lines of
research on global climate change.
Further, I assume they all agree
on anthropogenic global warming as per Oreskes»
research.
But Nature's reputation suffered a huge black eye
on November 21, 2009 when a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia's Climate
Research Unit (CRU) and released 1079 emails and 72 documents exposing willful fraud in several scientific papers published in Nature that supported Al Gore's theory
Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Quantifying the consensus
on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature — Abstract — Environmental
Research Letters — IOPscience We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus
on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, examining 11944 climate abstracts from 1991 — 2011 matching the topics «
global climate change» or «
global warming».
Peiser has long opposed mainstream science's conclusions about
anthropogenic global warming; in 2005 Peiser said he had data which refuted an article published in Science Magazine, claiming 100 % of peer - reviewed
research papers
on climate change agreed with the scientific consensus of
global warming.
Our peer - reviewed paper Quantifying the Consensus
on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the Scientific Literature is freely available at the Environmental
Research Letters (ERL) website.
He also lead - authored the paper Quantifying the Consensus
on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature, which was tweeted by President Obama and was awarded the best paper published in Environmental
Research Letters in 2013.
Earlier this year, we submitted our paper, Quantifying the consensus
on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature, to the high - impact journal Environmental
Research Letters (ERL).
On and about November 22, 2009, The Pennsylvania State University began to receive numerous communications (emails, phone calls and letters) accusing Dr. Michael E, Mann of having engaged in acts, beginning in approximately 1998, that included manipulating data, destroying records and colluding to hamper the progress of scientific discourse around the issue of anthropogenic global warming, These accusations were based on perceptions of the content of the emails stolen from a server at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in Great Britain as widely reporte
On and about November 22, 2009, The Pennsylvania State University began to receive numerous communications (emails, phone calls and letters) accusing Dr. Michael E, Mann of having engaged in acts, beginning in approximately 1998, that included manipulating data, destroying records and colluding to hamper the progress of scientific discourse around the issue of
anthropogenic global warming, These accusations were based
on perceptions of the content of the emails stolen from a server at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in Great Britain as widely reporte
on perceptions of the content of the emails stolen from a server at the Climatic
Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in Great Britain as widely reported,
In a March 2 statement, Soon called the Greenpeace - initiated attacks
on him «a shameless attempt to silence my scientific
research and writings, and to make an example out of me as a warning to any other researcher who may dare question in the slightest their fervently held orthodoxy of
anthropogenic global warming....
The peer - reviewed survey, «Quantifying the consensus
on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature,» was published today in the peer - reviewed Environmental
Research Letters, a publication of the Institute of Physics (IOP).