Sentences with phrase «researchers are right about»

Not exact matches

In short, and not surprisingly, the World's most gifted evolutionary biologists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, archeologists, paleontologists, historians, modern medical researchers and linguists (and about 2,000 years of accu.mulated knowledge) are right and a handful of Iron Age Middle Eastern goat herders were wrong.

Spanish researchers created a program called The Million Song Dataset that broke down the lyrics and melodies of pop songs between 1955 and 2010 and determined that your Grandpa is right about kids these days: their music is too loud and it all sounds the same.

In short, and not surprisingly, the World's most gifted evolutionary biologists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, archeologists, paleontologists, historians, modern medical researchers and linguists (and about 2,000 years of acc.umulated knowledge) are right and a handful of Iron Age Middle Eastern goat herders were wrong.

As reported by Reuters, Dr. William Copeland, a psychiatry researcher at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, USA, stated that: «This study is about righting a longstanding error and prejudice about the differences between these common childhood adversities,» adding: «It suggests that whether we are talking about prevention, screening or treatment, our notions of childhood mistreatment need to be broader and more holistic than they have been.

Happiness is about having experiences that are meaningful and valuable, including emotions that you think are the right ones to have,» said lead researcher Maya Tamir, PhD, a psychology professor at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Previously, researchers had two theories about how neurons in the motor cortex might control movement: One was that these neurons fired in patterns that represent more abstract commands, such as «move your arm to the right,» and then neurons in different brain areas would translate those instructions to guide the muscle contractions that make the arm move; the other was that the motor cortex neurons would actually send directions to the arm muscles, telling them how to contract.

«What's appealing about the current growing body of evidence on right - to - carry laws is that different researchers using different methodologies and different data sets are coming to similar conclusions... We are all coalescing around the same message, and that's the best that science can do: Look at the imperfect data in different ways and see if a consistent story emerges.»

But in the overly busy mode that most researchers operate in, I found I was feeling less bullish about academia as I knew it and increasingly uncertain it was the right fit.

And that means the insects could be more useful than researchers have imagined for answering questions about how the brain sets the right course.

«Right now success rates for grant applications are about 23 percent, which is not bad in an international context,» says Joan Heath, a zebrafish researcher at the Parkville Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research in Melbourne, Australia.

Right now, we know the structures of about 1 percent of all human GPCRs, and researchers are using two key approaches to generate and study more.

Right now, the researchers are able to develop a monthly average for snowpack about 10 days after the end of the month.

The researchers are looking forward to testing their predictions with real data from Jupiter, and they won't have to wait long: NASA's Juno space probe is orbiting Jupiter right now, collecting data about its atmosphere, magnetic field and interior.

Until then, the problem of stereoscopic vision seemed intractable because, if von Helmholtz were right, researchers would have had to tackle the physiology of form perception first — about which no one had the foggiest idea how to proceed.

As it happened, I'd written a science fiction story that seemed like it might fit — it was about a couple of researchers working in a dusty lab who stumble upon a universal cure for cancer (you remember I said science fiction, right?)

The NIH / NHGRI authors of the policy piece are right when they point out that the researcher - participant relationship is all about trust.

TKF: What are the big questions about the gut - microbiome - brain connection that researchers are trying to answer right now?

The study findings may be about more than just bragging rights, however: Researchers say they may shed light on how male and female brains age differently, and why women are at higher risk for Alzheimer's disease.

The D * Action project has been initiated by GrassrootsHealth along with 42 leading vitamin D researchers to demonstrate how health can be achieved right now with what's known about vitamin D with a combination of vitamin D measurement and health outcome tracking.

Increasingly, researchers are finding that proper nutrition is not just about getting the right kind and amount of nutrients needed for biological processes.

This is a short film about how some researchers are going right to the heart, er, brain, of the matter of love.

«Declaring education to be an implicit fundamental right would raise difficult constitutional questions about other essentials such as food, shelter, and health care,» say Lindseth, Testani, and Peifer, as well as questions about the adequacy of school funding levels about which education researchers do not agree.

These youth researchers can then create their own research questions and use observations and feedback from peers to draw conclusions about what's going right, what could be improved, and how to help.

This year, researchers from Stanford University used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide - Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) and found the exact same thing — dogs are still dangerous when we don't approach them the right way, and don't educate our kids about canine behavior.

The researchers found that one group ate the new food right away, one group took about two days before it started eating, and the last group wouldn't eat the pellets at all, so it was put back on seed.

Funding is essentially a commons so individual researchers have little incentive to grow it; there are other more direct ways to career success (like being right about a controversial problem).

But the record clearly shows that it was Trenberth who made that last comment, and that he was expressing misgivings about the quality of the researcher's work, not whether he was on the «right side» of scientific issues.

We achieve our mission by: Offering free legal aid to scientists Educating researchers about their rights and responsibilities Sharing strategies and information about cases with attorneys Publicizing attacks on science — because knowledge is power

It can not be right for Sir Paul Nurse to make such accusations in a leading London newspaper without being very specific — without saying who told him, without giving the names of the researchers they told him about, without giving the names of those who are sending those researchers «lots of requests», without giving specific details and numbers of the requests, and above all without explaining why such behaviour, however unreasonable, could possibly be viewed as intimidating.

We understand that the waiver criteria in the final rule may initially cause confusion for IRBs and researchers that must attend to both the final rule and the Common Rule, but we believe that the additional waiver criteria adopted in the final rule are essential to ensure that individuals» privacy rights and welfare are adequately safeguarded when protected health information about themselves is used for research without their authorization.

While we're not sure that this is a solution everyone would be happy with, we do think that the researchers are asking the right questions about the isolating effects of technology and modern life.

But now that Facebook has finally made these admissions about how easy it was for third parties, whether marketing researchers, cyber-criminals, or foreign propagandists, it raises the question of why the social media company didn't do a better job right from the start of protecting its greatest asset — users» personal data — from unrestricted exploitation.

Elon Musk, Professor Stephen Hawking and the 1,000 other AI researchers who signed today's warning about autonomous weapons are right — grafting AI onto the tools of warfare will produce the AK - 47 of the future, an endlessly replicable, increasingly cheaper means of murder.

As the expression of competence in contexts of adversity, resilience is of great interest to researchers and practitioners in its own right, as well as for what it can tell us about development in contexts of security.

Here's the Right (and Wrong) Way to Fight 7 Things Researchers Know About the Science of Long - Lasting Love