Fossil fuel corporations have five times more oil and coal and gas in known
reserves than climate scientists think is safe to burn.
Not exact matches
The boom in unconventional fuels — such as bitumen extracted from Alberta's tar sands and oil extracted from North Dakota's Bakken shale formation by hydraulic fracturing («fracking»)-- has swelled global
reserves even as
climate scientists issue ever - sterner warnings that burning more
than a small fraction of these
reserves would be suicidal.
As the International Energy Agency warned, â $ œno more
than one - third of proven
reserves of fossil fuels can be consumed prior to 2050â $ â $» unless carbon capture and storage technology is widely deployed â $» otherwise weâ $ ™ ll bust through the limit of a 2 degree Celsius rise in average temperature that
climate scientists believe will unleash truly disruptive ice melt, sea level rise and weather extremes.
The research underlying that concept showed that the carbon embedded in proven fossil fuel
reserves on the books of fossil fuel companies is many times greater
than what
climate scientists have determined the atmosphere can withstand in a safe
climate scenario.