So the idea that [reproduction] is a complete explanation sets up
a resistance in a lot of people [to questions such as] why is it that these emotions have evolved, and what evolutionary function do they serve?
Not exact matches
It shows how Gandhi was a deeply spiritual man who saw not man and woman, Hindu and Muslim or black and white; just
people who all deserved the same respect; a very unusual attitude for a «holy man»... He preached non-violence and used the media
in a way never seen before to shame his oppressors through the use
of passive
resistance, showing that it takes a
lot more courage to take a beating than give one and
in doing so was all but responsible for the dissolution
of the Bri...
And I've begun to wonder, also, if the unspoken concern that lies behind
resistance to ebooks among literary - minded
people isn't somehow related to this feeling, that the novel is on the cusp
of changing irrevocably, becoming something unrecognisable to we who care about it so, and
in the traditional capitalist manner: with little to no discussion about what these changes might mean and
lots of racing pell - mell toward the ever - retreating utopian future.
EM: I think there's a
lot of resistance and
people are reacting
in whatever ways they think are suitable.
But we thought we'd take a little bit
of a break from that and talk more about its purpose and why we built it, which is that
in law practice and small firm law practice if you are a creative business
person or an innovator or tech oriented or trying to think up ways to better serve clients that haven't been tried before, we've found that that can be really isolating and that there can often be a
lot of active
resistance from other lawyers, from bar associations, from regulators, and that it can just be a really strange experience to be someone trying to make your business better, make the world better, and to feel alone or to feel like
people are actively trying to stop you from doing that.