Proactively worked with supervisors and followed up for timely work around /
resolutions of work stoppages.
Not exact matches
The combination
of the unilateral authority
of public employers to determine whether and how essential services are to be maintained during a
work stoppage, combined with a lack
of an adequate review mechanism and the absence
of a meaningful dispute
resolution mechanism to resolve bargaining impasses, can only lead to the conclusion that the PSESA is not minimally impairing — and so it is unconstitutional.
The unilateral authority
of public employers to determine whether and how essential services are to be maintained during a
work stoppage with no adequate review mechanism, and the absence
of a meaningful dispute
resolution mechanism to resolve bargaining impasses, justify the trial judge's conclusion that the PSESA impairs the s. 2 (d) rights more than is necessary.