Sentences with phrase «resolve access disputes»

Here are a few guidelines for those of you looking for information on how to resolve access disputes.

Not exact matches

The governor may not have to take on the pope, but he may try to resolve a potential dispute with newly elected New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio over how to fund universal access to pre-kindergarten.

The governor may not have to take on the Pope, but he may in his budget try to resolve a potential dispute with newly elected New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio over how to fund universal access to pre kindergarten.

According to him, a meeting convened on Tuesday, involving all stakeholders, failed to resolve the dispute as the union prevented the management from accessing the office premises on Wednesday.

The governor may not have to take on the Pope, but he may in his budget try to resolve a potential dispute with newly elected New York City Mayor Bill deBlasio over how to fund universal access to pre kindergarten.

Children can now ask for their additional support needs to be identified and planned for; receive advice and information about their additional support needs; be part of discussions about the support that they will receive; and access dispute resolution procedures to resolve concerns

Working with families to provide technical support in understanding and accessing their procedural safeguards under the IDEA 2004 and assisting parents / guardians in resolving disputes prior to mediation or due process hearings.

You'll get instant online access to your credit report, record of companies that have reviewed your credit history, and a confirmation number to resolve disputes and fix errors.

If an SMSF member loses money due to theft or fraud, they do not have access to any special compensation schemes or the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal to resolve disputes.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).

Dam removal will improve water quality and open access to hundreds of miles of habitat for endangered salmon and steelhead, ideally resolving lingering disputes over water in the basin and providing greater economic security for fishing, tribal, and agricultural communities.

Speedy resolution is not only better for the parties (and not just in family law disputes) but it also increases access to justice, because more disputes get resolved better at less cost per dispute.

The only way, the only way, to bring down the cost of dispute resolution and thus to improve access to justice where the improvements are most needed (to the nth degree) is to shorten the time it takes to resolve disputes.

protected access to justice as Acas's conciliation service has been effective in assisting people resolve their disputes.

However, the Brexit vote has brought into question the access of UK businesses and individuals to the ECJ to resolve legal disputes, pursue damages or challenge government decisions that might impact their profitability.

The decision states that while court hearing fees are permissible in principle, those that present «undue hardship» to litigants, such that they are discouraged from accessing the court system, violate core jurisdictional principles within the Constitution: «The historic task of the superior courts is to resolve disputes between individuals and decide questions of private and public law.

Equal access to a civil and family justice system that can uphold rights and fairly and effectively resolve disputes is a fundamental and far - reaching component of democratic societies.

Through the Legal Services Society, funded by the government, the province also provided a family law line and extended duty counsel to allow the public to access the system and secure advice to resolve disputes in family law.

«It is a forum where anyone can share, access and discuss information about the non-judicial mechanisms and resources available around the world to help companies and their external stakeholders resolve disputes.

We understand that you are currently working on some projects that aim to harness technology to improve access to justice for so that the public can public know all their available options in resolving disputes including online legal consultation services.

In Virginia, a court may consider any of the following factors, among others, in making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; the role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determination.

Necessity being the mother of invention, an increasing need for better access to justice and the means for delivering it means that your home computer, laptop, or mobile device can serve as the place where disputes are resolved.

A perspective that regarded individuals as being free to frame, manage and resolve their disputes as they deem best and to involve the state (e.g., judges) only on a «by exception» basis, would likely come to a different assessment of what access to justice entailed.

Lack of access to justice represents a problem where the very legitimacy of the legal system as a way for all Canadians to resolve disputes is at stake.

There are approximately 2000 qualified advocates for the 36 million Ugandans, making it difficult for many to access legal assistance, resulting in many unresolved disputes or resolved using crude methods like mob justice.

This is an extremely important case in the ongoing struggle to ensure that everyone has access to our justice system to resolve disputes such as who has custody of children after parents separate.

Public Access to Justice: Apps, Tools, and Processes to improve access to justice and allow the public to resolve disputes efficAccess to Justice: Apps, Tools, and Processes to improve access to justice and allow the public to resolve disputes efficaccess to justice and allow the public to resolve disputes efficiently

Comparing the present matter to Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [2014] 3 SCR 31, 2014 SCC 59 (CanLII), the Court of Appeal noted at para. 51 that, whereas the hearing fees in that case «actually bar access to the superior courts» by preventing ``... some individuals from having their private and public law disputes resolved by the courts», the «proper balance» is achieved by the legislature with respect to civil jury fees:

The process should empower families through skills development, assist them to resolve their own disputes, provide access to appropriate services, and offer a variety of dispute resolution forums where the family can resolve problems without additional emotional trauma.

Please be aware that litigation as a means of resolving custody and access disputes should rarely be used, except in cases of the worst disagreement and acrimony.

The Justice Bot provides access to inexpensive tools and legal resources to help people navigate the courts, resolve disputes, translates legalese to common terms effectively ensuring in the process that they obtain justice.

Assisting IT suppliers and customer organisations on resolving large - scale disputes with under - licensing (direct / indirect use / access), IT outsourcing, changes in specification / scope, project delivery delays and performance failures, using escalated dispute resolution processes, negotiation, mediation, expert determination, arbitration and court proceedings (most recently SAP UK Limited v Diageo Great Britain Ltd (2017)-RRB-

As a family law lawyer I have helped resolve a significant number of access disputes between parents.

Mediation is a voluntary way of resolving disputes where a trained mediator helps parties to reach an agreement about family law matters such as spousal support, the division of property, custody of and access to the children, child support or any other family - related issues.

Mediation is an alternative dispute resolution process for resolving family law issues, such as custody, access and child support.

NJP will also accept cases involving other issues, such as transportation, discrimination in public accommodations, general barriers to accessing courts and other means of resolving disputes or matters that otherwise address systemic problems experienced by low income individuals or communities.

Finding themselves forced to represent themselves, these men and women are struggling to resolve disputes over child custody, or support, or access, or to resolve a long - running business conflict, or a dismissal dispute with an employer.

Without common discovery (the process by which both sides are afforded the opportunity to examine all evidence pertaining to the case), parties to arbitration may not have access to all the facts that could help in resolving the dispute.

-- On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8.

Speed: The absence of the application of strict rules of evidence and precedent permits an ombudsman's office quick access to decision makers and a focused and fast understanding of the issue in dispute and the pragmatic means for resolving it.

This might require a «culture shift» but is necessary to ensure that Canadians can access the civil justice system to affordably resolve their disputes.

Family court counsellors help people without a lawyer with preparing for court, accessing the court system and resolving parenting disputes.

Access to justice means enabling people to avoid, manage and resolve legal problems and disputes.

Not good enough, say the Trial Lawyers and the BC branch of the Canadian Bar Association, as well as a number of interveners, who argue that the fees impede access to justice and prevent the less well - off litigants from having their disputes resolved by courts.

As leaders, we understand that the legal and business interests of our clients are furthered when access to the legal system is readily available to resolve disputes.

Erika is also committed to providing all members of the Ottawa community with access to justice, especially when it comes to resolving disputes over custody, access and property after a separation.

Susskind noted various online dispute resolutions already in place around the world that provide greater access to justice by obviating the need for costly counsel; compressing the time for resolving disputes; providing online access; and reducing court administration costs.

Section 180 marks a sea change in court fees because, contrary to established policy, it allows the Lord Chancellor to make a profit out of the fees charged for seeking the public court to resolve a dispute, or again as some might put it, securing access to justice.

At Neinstein Personal Injury Lawyers, our expertise extends to all aspects of personal injury law, from accessing compensation for serious injuries to resolving accident benefits and insurance disputes.

All Canadians deserve access to justice by which citizens are able to acquire information about legal matters, obtain legal services, resolve disputes through informal mechanisms, and take full advantage of their legal rights.