So in other words you have finally worked out population alone will not
resolve dangerous climate change, and neither will anything else.
Not exact matches
Only when that transition occurs, so the notion goes, is there a chance of
resolving «commons» issues like limiting chances of
dangerous human - caused disruption of the
climate; trimming the billion - person tail off the curve of deep poverty that (along with dysfunctional government) holds back progress in the South; conserving the world's eroding biological patrimony.
The idea that there might be a way to soften the blow of human - created
climate change with technology is
dangerous, because it weakens the
resolve that will be necessary to actually deal with emissions.
Given that the mainstream scientific community now believes that the world is quickly running out of time to prevent
dangerous climate change, the moral problems with waiting until all
climate scientific uncertainties are
resolved are unfortunately becoming obvious.