And even more interesting, Steph Tai at Concurring Opinions ponders how the Carhart Court's willingness to defer to Congressional findings to
resolve scientific uncertainty might apply in other cases such as those involving global warming, where scientific and legal findings are intermingled.
This is particularly true on issues where waiting to
resolve scientific uncertainty makes the problem worse or waiting makes the problem harder to solve, clear attributes of climate change.
That makes
resolving scientific uncertainties all the more important.
When you argue that a nation emitting high levels of ghgs need not adopt climate change policies because there is scientific uncertainty about adverse climate change impacts, are you arguing that a nation need not take action on climate change until scientific uncertainties are resolved given that waiting to
resolve all scientific uncertainties before action is taken may very likely make it too late to prevent catastrophic climate change harms to millions of people around the world?
Not exact matches
New research using data from NASA's Van Allen Probes mission helps
resolve decades of
scientific uncertainty over the origin of ultra-relativistic electrons in Earth's near space environment, and is likely to influence our understanding of planetary magnetospheres throughout the universe.
Given that the mainstream
scientific community now believes that the world is quickly running out of time to prevent dangerous climate change, the moral problems with waiting until all climate
scientific uncertainties are
resolved are unfortunately becoming obvious.
Fourth some arguments against climate change policies on the basis of
scientific uncertainty often rest on the ethically dubious notion that nothing should be done to reduce a threat that some are imposing on others until all
uncertainties are
resolved.
No nation need act to reduce the threat of climate change until all
scientific uncertainties about climate change impacts are
resolved.
«There are too many
scientific uncertainties relating both to the efficacy of ocean fertilization and its possible environmental side effects that need to be
resolved before even larger experiments should be considered, let alone the process commercialized,» Rayfuse says.
So there are a lot of
scientific issues to
resolve, dismissing this
uncertainty and this disagreement is not useful, and has caused much uneccessary conflict and distraction from the real policy issues at hand.
In that decision, WCAT was not patently unreasonable in rejecting the notion that it was required to have proof of causation to the level of
scientific certitude, and in
resolving the
uncertainty in the worker's favour.