Sentences with phrase «respect others point»

Fianlly consider respecting the other point of view I didn't say agreeing just respecting.

They respect other points of view, listen well, and typically have a high capacity for empathy, all of which are the earmarks of a solid communicator.

He also listens carefully and respects other points of view,» says Lecturer Richard Weissbourd, director of HDP.

Not exact matches

«In responding to this incident — indeed in responding to this election — we need to hear each other's stories, not slogans, we need to work towards understanding, not scoring points, and we need to find a way to move forward that respects and values each and every member of our community,» Superintendent Shawn Lewis - Lakin said in a statement.

With massive and increasing structural deficits; exploding debt in all sectors; hostile demographics; social and political fracturing and disintegration; grotesque wealth inequality; extraordinary global trade competition; a complete collapse of respect for vital government organizations such as the Justice Department and FBI, which the people now realize have gone rogue; an extremely complex and corrosive global geopolitical environment; the real prospect of war, potentially nuclear and worldwide; not to mention numerous additional factors, we can only point to few other times in history more dangerous to the people's financial welfare, and therefore more overall bullish for gold, one of the only financial sanctuaries proven to work in times of dislocation.

With all due respect to Dimon, some might point out that «inventing a currency out of thin air» is how we got Federal Reserve Notes and other forms of paper money in the first place.

@Christine, Points well - made; your criticisms are indeed valid in some respects, arguably way off in others, but I get the gist of what you're saying.

The point is not trying to force people to believe the same as the atheist; the point is to respect all people, allow them to live as they believe best, and do not allow people in positions of power or government to force their religious beliefs upon others.

We speak not as supplying His name; but for want, we use good names, in order that the mind may have these as points of support, so as not to err in other respects.

We see at once that the historical in the more concrete sense is a matter of indifference; we may suppose a degree of ignorance with respect to it, and permit this ignorance as if to annihilate one detail after the other, historically annihilating the historical; if only the Moment remains, as point of departure for the Eternal, the Paradox will be there.

In many respects it was only possible to speak with full theological accuracy about the Constantinian turning - point, the feudal State of the Middle Ages and innumerable other events in the life of the Church, when these events already belonged to the past.

True, if the road is heading toward that nebulous region of «tolerance» that has become so difficult to locate in American society, we should all be willing to walk a ways with each other, but eventually we will reach departure points that can and should be respected.

As Christians, Birch and Cobb believe that in many respects the Whiteheadian vision of reality is more compatible with biblical points of view than are other visions, Platonic for example, on which Christian in the past have relied.

Then again my school made it a point to teach us about other religions so we could respect them just as much.

You make a good point about the importance of respecting each other's religion.

Charitable judgment of others need not be exercised to the point of blindly entrusting to them what they are unable to appreciate or respect.

Much more recently Eldridge Cleaver has pointed out that the splitting tendency in American culture, which we have traced back to the early Puritans, tended to make the white man a mind without a body and the black man a body without a mind.20 Only when the white man comes to respect his own body, to accept it as part of himself, will he be able to accept the black man's mind and treat him as something other than the living symbol of what he has rejected in himself.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

Psychiatrist Jerome D. Frank points out that «intimate sharing of feelings, ideas and experiences in an atmosphere of mutual respect and understanding enhances self - respect, deepens self - understanding, and helps a person live with others.

well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth of knowledge and understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities of the present and the potential of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision of the future based upon the past?

To a large extent this is an extension of the first point; one enjoys one's work if it gains the approval, appreciation, and respect of others, and seems to contribute to their well being.

They all seem to agree and would have no problem / issue with the extra attention to the turban with respect to security issues but none of them can agree with it because there is no rationale to back up why the turban is being pointed out yet no other article of clothing is.

Yet I believe his metaphysics allows for this understanding and that his cosmology, not only with respect to the problem now at hand — the locus of the soul — but at other points as well, is more intelligible if we affirm this principle.

By this point in its career, paideia had come to have four aspects that continue to mark it thereafter, despite changes in other respects.11 These aspects are largely the legacy of Plato's proposed reform of Athens» traditional educational practices.

What is fundamental is the willingness to consider each other's point of view; this willingness is rooted in a degree of mutual respect.

Yet, at the same time she did it while respecting and even trying to understand the other points the religious members had.

What makes moral feelings peculiar is the logical point behind Kant's thrust — we owe dignity and respect to other persons as persons regardless of our other feelings about them, and in a moral crisis we may feel urgently the not always so gentle persuasion of God in the form of conscience.

Even many of today's Christians, who in other respects may be regarded as being very liberal in their outlook, have been inclined to rest their faith on the historical reliability of the resurrection narratives, as pointing to at least one incontestable miracle of a supernatural character, and they have been alarmed when the «Empty Tomb» stories came to be regarded as legendary.

Others can be won to your point of view if you will follow such practices as avoiding arguments, showing respect for the opinions of others, and trying to see the other's point ofOthers can be won to your point of view if you will follow such practices as avoiding arguments, showing respect for the opinions of others, and trying to see the other's point ofothers, and trying to see the other's point of view.

Secondly then, is it possible that his unoccasioned re-emphasis of this point is in some way related to the development of a new position with respect to the role of the percipient event in perception, a role, that is, which is other than that of merely being involved?

Now I come close to the theme of this article: one writer, and I have found no other, in the early Middle Ages attacked classical theism head - on precisely on its two most vulnerable points — its affirmation of, or failure definitely to reject, unqualified theological determinism, and its commitment to endless posthumous careers for human persons, making them in that respect rivals to God.

Many of the people I avoid are nice people and my stepping away from church life came at a point where I had the respect of other church leaders, having «paid my dues» for 20 years in ministry.

=============== Summary: Other than your comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1 above), the remainder of your comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.

That points up the other thing that churches and their pastors get from involvement in the Nehemiah Project: a sense of deep respect for the hard - pressed people, earners of extremely modest wages, whom they seek to serve.

You said, «Summary: Other than your comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1 above), the remainder of your comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.»

Bloom insists that this optimism was not shared by the nation's founders, who «insisted that the principles of democratic government must be returned to and consulted even though the consequences might be harsh for certain points of view, some merely tolerated and not respected, others forbidden outright.»

The president has pointed to hockey and racing as more appropriate venues and people who respected the flag and anthem compared to the other leagues.

Good point, but how many other managers are there with so much respect that they can convince players to join a club that is building it's way to the summit, most of them join a team that is already at the top.

There is no reason for DJ to not be a huge star at this point besides the fact that idiotic casual fans don't respect small guys and only get excited about soap operas where two guys talk smack about each other.

And as for Jon Fox and myself being Pals?We have never met never spoken and never corresponded.We share a common hatred of Arsene Wenger.We also share a long time support of Arsenal Football Club.That is it.There are many many others who post their thoughts and feelings on this site who feel the same way about Wenger and the hierarchy of this club as we do.It would be very very easy to rip your comments to shreds but I simply refuse to waste time pointing out the obvious to you other than to say if your «posts» carried as much conviction and feeling as the ones posted by Jon Fox then you would find yourself gaining far more respect than what you are getting now.Study Ken1945 and how he writes his posts.

On the other hand, oddsmakers certainly respect the 10th - seeded Shockers, opening them as 6.5 - point favorites against the 7th - seeded Dayton Flyers.

Like others who share this point of view, although I respect Wenger's achievements, I have become disillusioned by the inevitable repeated pattern that Arsenal's season consistently took and couldn't see that there would be any change whilst Wenger was in charge.

The decision received a spectrum of reaction, with some voicing their dislike of seeing micro-management, with others recognising that Force India isn't a financial goliath in the sport and that its drivers should respect this and do their primary job - collect points.

In fact I respect it and the fact that I am allowed to come on and argue my point with other fellow gooners.

It came to the point that ARSENAL does not inspire respect nor concern to their adversaries anymore, we start with a bang (ticky tacka BS) the other team unsettled, at times we score a goal even 2 completely dominant, just to deflate immediately, other teams have seen this and is a matter of time before they start their merciless attack with the results we have seen lately, yesterday CECH was the last man standing, Sunderland had clear opportunities to win this game.....

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

The only other thing I wanted to mention was regarding Jody's comment — «5) my parents respected me enough to allow me that decision and at this point I've not found a valid reason to pursue such a pointless operation.»

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that, once again, gluten allergies were respected and accommodated in the Holiday Valley cafeteria — with a gluten - free pizza available and knowledgeable staff who could point out the other gluten - free options.

I am intrigued by the idea that there are many other ways to betray a loved one (a concept we address in The New I Do)-- denying sex, indifference, emotional neglect, contempt, lack of respect, years of refusal of intimacy, as Mating in Captivity author Ester Perel points out.

This is why the Code and Resolutions must be respected as minimum standards everywhere «independently of any other measures taken for implementation of this Code» (I'm repeating it, because Nestlé needs to be reminded until it accepts this point).