Not exact matches
4) Facilitation / Divorce Co-ordinator (Couples / Family): Facilitation can be used
to resolve any type of family dispute — divorce (financial aspects, contact and care, rights and responsibilities in
respect of the parents
to the
children, holiday contact,
maintenance issues), post-divorce disputes (ongoing contact, disputes with regard
to joint decisions
to be made between the parties etc),
maintenance, permanent relationship or civil union disputes, relocation matters, testamentary division.
(Sec. 7004) With
respect to payments
to LEAs for federally connected
children under the Impact Aid program, the bill: (1) modifies eligibility requirements for heavily impacted LEAs and LEAs serving on - base
children during renovation or repair projects, (2) makes certain formula adjustments that apply when appropriations are insufficient
to make payments in full, (3) establishes hold harmless provisions with
respect to LEAs facing payment reductions, and (4) eliminates
maintenance of effort requirements for LEAs.
The
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill hit the bookstands earlier this month — the «other payments» are in respect of mesothelioma, which bears no immediate relationship to child sup
Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill hit the bookstands earlier this month — the «other payments» are in
respect of mesothelioma, which bears no immediate relationship
to child sup
child support.
Section 281 (5) provides as follows: «Discharge does not, except
to such extent and on such conditions as the court may direct, release the bankrupt from any bankruptcy debt which --(a) consists in a liability
to pay damages [of specific types]... in
respect of personal injuries
to any person; or (b) arises under any order made in family proceedings or under a
maintenance calculation made under the
Child Support Act 1991.»
However, this was introduced prior
to the
Child Support Act, and so the CSA is seen
to have taken over the function of regulating
maintenance in
respect of
children.
a) the respondent was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; b) the respondent has submitted
to the jurisdiction either expressly or by defending on the merits of the case without objecting
to the jurisdiction at the first available opportunity; c) the creditor was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; d) the
child for whom
maintenance was ordered was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted, provided that the respondent has lived with the
child in that State or has resided in that State and provided support for the
child there; e) except in disputes relating
to maintenance obligations in
respect of
children, there has been agreement
to the jurisdiction in writing by the parties; or f) the decision was made by an authority exercising jurisdiction on a matter of personal status or parental responsibility, unless that jurisdiction was based solely on the nationality of one of the parties.
When the court is deciding whether
to make a
maintenance order in
respect of a
child, it will consider the income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources of both parties.
(a) if an international
maintenance arrangement applies in
respect of a
child — a circumstance set out in paragraph (1)(f) is not a
child support terminating event in relation
to the
child; and
Where a recipient of Deserted Wife's Benefit, Deserted Wife's Allowance, Lone Parent's Allowance or One - Parent Family Payment is receiving
maintenance payments by way of a Family Law Court Order, (either a Family Law Maintenance Order or a Separation Agreement which has gone through the court and has a Maintenance clause in it) and those maintenance payments have not been assessed in deciding his / her rate of payment, then s / he is liable to transfer any payments received to the Minister for Employment Affairs and Employment Affairs and Social Protection, including any payments made in respect o
maintenance payments by way of a Family Law Court Order, (either a Family Law
Maintenance Order or a Separation Agreement which has gone through the court and has a Maintenance clause in it) and those maintenance payments have not been assessed in deciding his / her rate of payment, then s / he is liable to transfer any payments received to the Minister for Employment Affairs and Employment Affairs and Social Protection, including any payments made in respect o
Maintenance Order or a Separation Agreement which has gone through the court and has a
Maintenance clause in it) and those maintenance payments have not been assessed in deciding his / her rate of payment, then s / he is liable to transfer any payments received to the Minister for Employment Affairs and Employment Affairs and Social Protection, including any payments made in respect o
Maintenance clause in it) and those
maintenance payments have not been assessed in deciding his / her rate of payment, then s / he is liable to transfer any payments received to the Minister for Employment Affairs and Employment Affairs and Social Protection, including any payments made in respect o
maintenance payments have not been assessed in deciding his / her rate of payment, then s / he is liable
to transfer any payments received
to the Minister for Employment Affairs and Employment Affairs and Social Protection, including any payments made in
respect of
children.
A person who is unmarried will be required
to make efforts
to seek
maintenance in
respect of the
child / ren from the other parent of the
child / ren.
to institute and conduct, on behalf of a
child, in the authority's or person's discretion, proceedings with
respect to the
maintenance of the
child.
overseas
maintenance agreement means a
maintenance agreement that has force and effect in a prescribed overseas jurisdiction by reason of the registration of the agreement, or the taking of any other action in relation
to the agreement, under the law of that jurisdiction and includes an agreement with
respect to the
maintenance of an ex ‑ nuptial
child that would be covered by the foregoing provisions of this definition if the
child were a
child of the marriage of the parties
to the agreement.
(b) are entitled
to receive, or required
to pay,
maintenance in
respect of a
child under a court order;
(1) A court having jurisdiction under this Part must not, at any time, make, revive or vary a
child maintenance order in relation to a child on the application of a person (the applicant) against, or in favour of, a person (the respondent) if an application could properly be made, at that time, by the applicant under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the respondent to be assessed in respect of the costs of the child, or vice v
child maintenance order in relation
to a
child on the application of a person (the applicant) against, or in favour of, a person (the respondent) if an application could properly be made, at that time, by the applicant under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the respondent to be assessed in respect of the costs of the child, or vice v
child on the application of a person (the applicant) against, or in favour of, a person (the respondent) if an application could properly be made, at that time, by the applicant under the
Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the respondent to be assessed in respect of the costs of the child, or vice v
Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the respondent
to be assessed in
respect of the costs of the
child, or vice v
child, or vice versa.
A person can elect a representative
to act on their behalf in
respect of their
Child Maintenance case.
offer sustained interventions, such as regular weekly follow - up, in order
to promote the
maintenance of what has been learned by the parent and allow the
child and the parent
to develop a feeling of security with
respect to a significant adult.
With
respect to their response
to psychosocial stressors (e.g. major life events, childhood trauma, and milder daily hassles), which have been shown
to contribute
to the development and
maintenance of psychosis in retrospective and prospective studies [31, 32, 33], FHx and ASz
children aged 11 — 14 years reported greater exposure
to negative life events and daily hassles, respectively, compared
to TD
children, and were more distressed by these experiences [34].
[100] Among other arguments, the Collards had alleged that the Western Australian Government had breached equitable fiduciary duties by removing their
children and failing
to act in their best interests with
respect to their custody,
maintenance and education.