Not exact matches
Saying god exists does not make that so... of course the opposite is true as well... all the pundits here (and Hawking) who like
to call things by descriptive names like «fairy tales» do so because they are desperate
to be right in this
matter... because no one can be
proven right or wrong in this I choose
to respect the faith that some have in Science as well as thos who have faith in God's existence.
Fortunately the year
proved, in many
respects,
to be a somewhat uneventful from the point of view of Bedlington terrier health
matters and the Health Group were able
to deal with
matters that did arise via the telephone / email.
However, in many
respects, the year
proved to be a somewhat uneventful from the point of view of Bedlington Terrier health
matters and any
matters requiring the attention of the Health Group were adequately dealt with by email / telephone or the occasional direct contact at dog shows.
Watch it once
to learn more about the three most feared and
respected motorcycle clubs and a second time
to read the scrolling news ticker — I knew it was only a
matter of time before scientists
proved global warming is a liberal hoax!
Remember that until a theory has been disproved — no
matter how fantastic it may appear in the light of our current knowledge — it should be accorded the
respect due
to a proposition that might be
proved — sometime.»
For even if the models are
proven to be wrong with
respect to their predictions of atmospheric warming, extreme weather, glacial melt, sea level rise, or any other attendant catastrophe, those who seek
to regulate and reduce CO2 emissions have a fall - back position, claiming that no
matter what happens
to the climate, the nations of the Earth must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions because of projected direct negative impacts on marine organisms via ocean acidification.
In
respect of (2), the Court of Appeal reiterated the test
to establish the defence of fair comment, being: (a) the comment must be on a
matter of public interest; (b) the comment must be based on fact; (c) the comment, though it can include inferences of fact, must be recognisable as comment; (d) whether the person honestly express that opinion on the
proved facts; and (e) whether the defendant was actuated by express malice.
Financial issues have
proven to be most amenable
to certainty in family law
matters, as a result of which we have the tables of quantum provided by the Child Support Guidelines, the formulae set out in the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines for the calculation of duration and quantum, and legislation establishing presumptions of varying strength with
respect to the division of matrimonial property.
In the absence of criminal allegations (in
respect of which Mr. Ghomeshi would be presumed innocent until
proven otherwise), the question is whether it is appropriate for a private 3rd party (albeit, in this case, a state actor)
to take action against Mr. Ghomeshi, particularly if that private party has come
to its own conclusion that the activities were not criminal (which, while not determinative of the
matter, should at least be binding as between the CBC and Mr. Ghomeshi).
In Charles Baker Ltd. v. Baker and Baker, the Court found that «the onus is upon the agent
to prove that the transaction was entered into after full and fair disclosure of all material circumstances and of everything known
to him
respecting the subject -
matter of the contract which would be likely
to influence the conduct of his principal.