It is a very helpful guide to the formation of conscience with
respect to questions raised in voting and other political activity if, in fidelity to the Church's teaching, one recognizes the «intrinsic evil» of taking innocent human life in abortion.
Not exact matches
The Hateful Truth:
To answer your question as it might apply to me, yes, even growing up in a Catholic household I was raised to respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out to hurt other
To answer your
question as it might apply
to me, yes, even growing up in a Catholic household I was raised to respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out to hurt other
to me, yes, even growing up in a Catholic household I was
raised to respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out to hurt other
to respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out
to hurt other
to hurt others.
The word «nihilism» has a complex history in modern philosophy, but I use it in a sense largely determined by Nietzsche and Heidegger, both of whom not only diagnosed modernity as nihilism, but saw Christianity as complicit in its genesis; both it seems
to me were penetratingly correct in some
respects, if disastrously wrong in most, and both
raised questions that we Christians ignore at our peril.
When the
question is
raised with
respect to Israel in these terms, the claim of the prophetic movement of the eighth and seventh centuries
to be the bearer of the axial revolution stands vindicated.
It
raises ethical
questions about norms in
respect to the transcendent realm.
To this one person replied: Suppose that your family, your school, all the groups to which you belonged and whose members you respected, practiced and justified discrimination so that you never had a chance to raise with yourself a question about it, were you then not a Christia
To this one person replied: Suppose that your family, your school, all the groups
to which you belonged and whose members you respected, practiced and justified discrimination so that you never had a chance to raise with yourself a question about it, were you then not a Christia
to which you belonged and whose members you
respected, practiced and justified discrimination so that you never had a chance
to raise with yourself a question about it, were you then not a Christia
to raise with yourself a
question about it, were you then not a Christian?
As Dan and I enter that stage of life when we will likely start a family, we want
to raise our kids in a community of Christ - followers where diversity is celebrated,
questions are welcomed, and differences are handled with love and
respect... not flippant «farewells.»
The teacher's approach
to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should
raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation
to other fields; (b) controversial
questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking
questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made
to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible,
respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not
to exist.
«This turns upside down the longstanding compensation practice of home care agencies with
respect to live - in aides, and
raises questions about how providers are supposed
to compensate their aides going forward,» said Emina Poricanin, an attorney with Hodgson Russ LLP, the firm that represented the New York State Association of Health Care Providers.
Smith's tax principles can be equally applied
to corporations operating within the state in
respect of the revenues that they
raise in virtue of being able
to trade in the state in
question.
«The recent revelations about Facebook and Cambridge Analytica
raise serious
questions about the extent
to which the social media giant
respected user privacy and whether it violated its consent decree with the FTC,» Markey said in a statement.
And third, I will describe how the law is upheld with
respect to intelligence cooperation with the United States, and deal with specific
questions that have been
raised about the work of GCHQ.
«Your record as Nassau County District Attorney and as a prosecutor in Kings County - Brooklyn
raises questions that you have yet
to answer about your ability
to administer justice evenhandedly, with
respect for the Constitution and without regard for race, color or creed.»
The revelations — in a book by
respected political historians Anthony Seldon and Guy Lodge
raise major
questions about the loyalty of the woman who is now deputy
to Labour leader Ed Miliband.
But the rapid advances, he said, are
raising the
question «of whether you are creating something human - ish that you have
to take seriously in terms of according it dignity and
respect — and figuring out what that even means.»
I dated a guy who answered the other
questions easily and without
raising any red flags, but as I got
to know him, I realized that when it came
to his church leadership, he had absolutely NO
respect for them and took every opportunity
to complain about them.
Questions about the variability in portfolio contents across students have been
raised with
respect to the influence on reliability, but the issue is pertinent with
respect to validity as well.
The
question of market failure is one
raised of late with
respect to the Louisiana Scholarship Program (LSP), a voucher program enacted and launched in 2008
to help low - income students in «low - performing» Louisiana public schools.
And so I just really have a couple of comments and they're sort of
raising some
questions with
respect to the report.
However, limited resources may account for this discrepancy,
raising questions with
respect to Rocketship's role in a public school district and offering one counter-narrative
to Rocketship's otherwise fairly - equitable, fairly - responsible nature (National Center for Education Statistics).
The exhibition also
raises a more crucial
question: how
to defend human rights and provide the ground for
respect and dignity when concepts of personal liberties are determined by a complex legacy as well as by contemporary forms of social conditioning?
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes
to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say
to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being
respected owe are not going
to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice
to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional
question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference
to a legally binding instrument
to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference
to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants
to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right
to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want
to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua
raising their sign in order
to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how
to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
«While the Paris Agreement does not address the issue of climate engineering expressly, the target of limiting global average temperature rise
to no more than 2 °C (a goal that appears unlikely
to be achieved in the absence of significant amounts of carbon removal)
raises questions with
respect to how the issue of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation management (SRM) technologies may be addressed under the Paris Agreement.
A proposed media - relations budget of $ 600,000, not counting any money for advertising, would be directed at science writers, editors, columnists and television network correspondents, using as many as 20 «
respected climate scientists» recruited expressly «
to inject credible science and scientific accountability into the global climate debate, thereby
raising questions about and undercutting the «prevailing scientific wisdom.»»
Raises the
question as
to due recourse, aside from blogs, with
respect to present misinformation designed
to confuse and slow down progress on action against AGW.
Miranda Walker, director of publications at the professional society that publishes Interfaces, said the journal's conflict - of - interest policies do not apply
to authors unless
questions are
raised during the peer review process «with
respect to suspicion of duplicate publication, fabrication of data or plagiarism.»
This decision has been the subject of considerable discussion among arbitration practitioners: as was discussed several months ago on Slaw, the case
raises a number of difficult
questions about how international arbitration and Canada's treaty obligations in that
respect interact with local procedural law — specifically limitation of actions — when seeking
to enforce the award, and more generally whether foreign judgments and arbitral awards should continue
to be treated, for limitations purposes, as mere contract debts.
The solution, however, has sparked controversy and debate within the blockchain community — the details of which are beyond the scope of this article — , and
raised questions with
respect to legal liability and investor rights.
Leaving
to one side the nice philosophical
questions that this
raises, the obvious difficulty with May's argument in
respect of the EU is that it is hard
to square with her position in relation
to the ECHR.
In addition
to raising insurance issues, giving advice with
respect to foreign law in a jurisdiction where you are not admitted could expose you
to an unauthorized practice of law prosecution, even assuming you have sufficient knowledge of the foreign law in
question.
(d) may permit the parties
to make representations with
respect to issues
raised by any
questions asked under clause (c); and
A recent decision rendered by an Ontario Arbitrator
raises questions about the hard line that seemed
to have been taken by adjudicators as a result of An Act
to amend the Occupational Health and Safety Act with
respect to violence and harassment in the workplace and other matters (formerly Bill 168), which amended the Occupational Health & Safety Act in order
to address workplace violence and harassment...
Questions about what is appropriate with
respect to lawyers» fees in contingency fee cases are
raised in this recent National Post article.
This
raises the fundamental
question of whether mainstream services can be sufficiently adapted
to both address the needs of Indigenous Australians, and
respect and accommodate their cultural differences.
The aforesaid point
raises the
question of: could the Tribunal still refuse
to acknowledge TREBs position ``... that the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction
to order TREB
to grant a compulsory licence with
respect to its intellectual property.»