as an atheist and democrat, I always saw Obama as basically a non-believer, who uses religion or pays
respect to religion when it is politically appropriate or expedient.
It's hard to «grow up and expand my mind» with
respect to religion when many priests are giving up child molesting for lent.
Not exact matches
Or
to put it more generously, the RFRA is designed
to protect religious freedom, and
to protect it even
when your
religion requires you
to do something bad, such as violating another human being's right
to be treated with dignity and
respect.
Obama is an extremist — by far the worst Democratic candidate ever —
when it comes
to respect for religious belief and institutional
religion.
If you * CANT *
respect my
religion, then please do nt complain or feel persecuted
when I do nt give
respect to yours.
When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the
respect for other
religions to coexist, the right
to free speech, and the ability
to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin
to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here
to join us, not
to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.
There can be «no claim of privilege, regardless of the
religion, with
respect to communications directly relevant
to sexual assault of a child,» prosecutor Eric Nichols said
when the judge invited him
to respond
to Jeffs» outbursts.
I'm nice
to anyone who shows me the same
respect and if
religion never come up, no problem, but
when it does and I get some type of zealot or another trying
to preach I polietly excuse myself, and write that person off as a lost cause and remember
to aviod them in the future.
A candidate's
religion is not supposed
to be an issue in politics, but both the media and liberal voters
respect that only
when the candidate is a Democrat.
I find it sad that people are being taught
to «
respect» someone else's
religion when perhaps instead, we should be saying, «Hey this is some worthless drivel from centuries ago
when Earth was flat and sickness was caused by witchcraft»
As a final comment, it is simply outrageous how one can point fingers at ONE
religion when many of our
respected countries are steeped in bloodshed, and continue
to commit atrocities.
Orwell thinks that from Shakespeare's writings it would be difficult
to know that he had any
religion» whereas in fact the placing of truth in the mouths of babes is one aspect of the Christian
respect for all human life; that same profound feeling is what inspires us
to protest loudly
when health authorities take a mental defective off dialysis machine because they consider his «quality of life» too low, in defiance of Christ's words in the Sermon on the Mount.
In fact, one could make the case that anyone attending the dinner, even the two candidates, would, by the vibrant solidarity of the evening, be reminded that America is at her finest
when people, free
to exercise their
religion, assemble on behalf of poor women and their babies, born and unborn, in a spirit of civility and
respect.
The
respect for culutral relativism is important up
to the point
when it offends OUR cultural relativism... no American Bald Eagle should ever be sacrificed these Native American tribes should no better... maybe their
religion needs
to go through a period of modernization instead of being stuck in stupid traditions of the past... this extremely offends me as an American... why do not the Native Americans
respect our culture?
Wouldn't it be egg on your face if you just happened
to be born into the wrong
religion and chose the wrong god and
when you die you find you were duped as your parents were, etc. etc. and you wind up roasting in the hell of the god you rejected and this god has more
respect for an atheist who actually demands evidence?
Two stated intentions of the National Day of Prayer were that it would be a day
when adherents of all great
religions could unite in prayer and that it may one day bring renewed
respect for God
to all the peoples of the world.»
When theologians adopt the evolutionary point of view, Metz thinks, their work can be «regarded, with different degrees of explicitness, as meta - theories with
respect to religion and theology.
(
Religion in the Making, Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1960, 31) This goal of elucidation is apparent
when he says that rational
religion's aim is
to make it «the central element in a coherent ordering of life... in
respect to the elucidation of thought, and in
respect to the direction of conduct...» (
Religion in the Making, Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1960, 30)
Religion's final product is the provision of «a meaning, in terms of value, for our own existence, a meaning which flows from the nature of things.»
Furthermore, freezing up
when you see someone in the traditional clothing of the country they hail from or wear
to respect their
religion, just makes you intolerant and foolish.
And although we did not see each other frequently, he in Iowa and I in California,
when we did see each other, our conversations were substantial, uplifting, wise and full of love and
respect (he and I did not always see eye -
to - eye on politics or
religion).
Today he commented, «At a time
when public concern about the place of
religion in schools has never been higher, we need full accountability and transparency with
respect to decisions as
to which schools are funded.
I'd be the first
to say that
when you're dealing with issues of
religion and deeply held faith you've got
to express yourself moderately and sensitively and with
respect one
to the other.
«If you find youself sniggering
when I mention, say, Wiccans, then shame on you - that's the problem right there, the idea that there are «serious»
religions which ought
to command «
respect» and then a bunch of silly cranks with draft ideas that «we» / the state can ignore.
So one thing you need
to put in mind
when traveling
to the Philippines always
respect their culture,
religion and family.
In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Zelman v. Simmons - Harris that school - voucher programs are consistent with the First Amendment's Establishment Clause
when they serve a secular purpose and are neutral with
respect to religion, and
when aid goes
to parents, who then choose where their child attends school.
An eloquent condemnation of this policy of repression was that of Chief Thunderchild, who queried: «Why has the white man no
respect for the
religion that was given
to us,
when we
respect the faith of other nations?»
Protecting freedom of
religion ensures that all people are treated with dignity and
respect, that religious minorities are not the subject of discrimination, that the state remains neutral and impartial
when it comes
to matters of deeply - held personal beliefs and that religious belief can not be preferred
to non-belief.