Sentences with phrase «respectable scientists»

Every attribution he has made to respectable scientists has been show to be a fabrication.

The is easily debunked: we can find seemingly respectable scientists and scientific institutions involved with, and fueling most conspiracy theories.

In this particular area of climate change, many of the assertions made by respectable scientists in peer reviewed literature are not backed up by archived data, code and other materials, and long legal battles have been fought to get those essential pieces of information put out for scrutiny.

In contrast with this clear and unjustified alarmism from supposedly respectable scientists in the pro-AGW camp, JQ has pilloried Lindzen based on a second - hand account of what was probably a throwaway remark.

[my words not Kerrys] Now, if Kerry is conceiding that point, one which is being made by other respectable scientists (as seen in this paper), that should clearly make one think about bringing up the models as evidence for AGW.

Not many respectable scientists would touch cold fusion today.

Which raises the question: How can respectable scientists see the same data and reach such different conclusions?

Respectable scientists — doctors, mental health experts, educationalists, sociologists — are beginning to suggest that when kids stop going out into the natural world to play, it can affect not just their development as individuals, but society as a whole....

They claim that thousands of respectable scientists aren't sure about climate change.

No respectable scientist would ever entertain such notions — except when it comes to the most powerful theory in the history of physics: quantum mechanics.

For a respectable scientist, wading into the murky world of the Ediacarans is a treacherous endeavor.

Any respectable scientist should steer clear of the military at all costs and not let their inventions be exploited.

Sad, really, I think he was a respectable scientist before.

Therefore the current null is something that no respectable scientist believes is true and this makes it worthless as a null, being already unanimously thought wrong on the grounds of basic science.

To any respectable scientist, the implication is clear: the proxies are unreliable and should not have been used at all, and the scientists involved must have known that.

Publishing a paper as the sole author seems to be a rite of passage for any respectable scientist, and I've finally crossed the threshold!

That's why Michael Mann was heralded as a climate change hero when he sacrificed his career as a respectable scientist to create a bogus historical temperature reconstruction which deleted all past climate variation of the last 2,000 years so that modern warming would appear as an UNPRECEDENTED!

And it seems like this would get broad support from by serious Christian and non-Christian scientist that truly want to be a sound respectable scientist.

The planet is cooling, as predicted by many perfectly respectable scientist, by 2030 it is predicted that we will be in a maunder minimum with all the calamity that implies.

Not exact matches

Because plenty of respectable people like Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee (who are not scientists) don't accept evolution, and that somehow validates his opinion.

Yeah, but they are biased in that they seek to prove everything through the lens of evolution so they often look in the wrong direction, and a large number of scientists are in fact Christians My point is this, if you take the time to look for the evidence and be open to it, you will find that there is a respectable amount of evidence to support the fact that there is a god and that he is the God of Christianity

As the chief scientist of NASA's space radiation program, Francis Cucinotta is the agency's chief oddsmaker, an erudite, respectable Jimmy the Greek who occasionally seasons his otherwise flat, technical speech with words like roulette.

Unfortunately, lots of young scientists don't know that these are accessible and entirely respectable — even deeply satisfying — careers, and many express frustration that they are ill - prepared for these types of jobs.

Now, it is apparent from reading even the first few pages of The Skeptical Environmentalist that Lomborg proposes to make the case that not just environmentalists, but a considerable part of the heretofore respectable environmental - science community, have been misunderstanding the relevant concepts, misrepresenting the relevant facts, understating the uncertainties, selecting data, and failing to acknowledge errors after these have been pointed out in other words, that the scientist contributors to what he calls «the environmental litany» (namely, that environmental problems are serious and becoming, in many instances more so) have been guilty of massively violating the scientists code of conduct.

Marion, a less flamboyant Ph.D. scientist, makes her more modest but still very comfortable home with her husband, a professor at one of the city's not - quite - tiptop, but still quite respectable, universities.

Several groups of scientists tested every component of the original formula to ensure top - notch quality and safety, and all of the results were published in respectable scientific journals.

That may be fine with postmodernist professors but it contradicts the work of every respectable cognitive scientist.

What amazes me is the amount of misinformation gets published regarding Climate Change, other science fields / projects (Large Hadron Project etc.), do not suffer from this misinformation so why do they think respectable climate scientists are fair game.

Do you think it's respectable to rebunk undead AGW - denialist memes long since decisively debunked by working climate scientists?

Dear Dr. Holdren, you write: «The activities of these folks, whether witting in the case of the scientists or unwitting in the case of their gullible adherents, have nothing to do with respectable scientific skepticism.»

If Martha's brand of «science» is now respectable, then scientists are in the same category as used - car - salesmen, hedge fund operators, and New Jersey politicians.

The consensus / settled scientists are not so respectable & coordinated in their current retreat as they appeared to be (as shown in the climategate emails) in the advancing manipulation of the IPCC AR4 process & report.

That excess is apparent to the alleged Three Percenters, to industrial scientists, to engineers, and to a respectable, growing handful of laymen scattered amongst those whose ideas ate no more than 140 characters long, some genuine whackos, and the otherwise uneducated.

Further, he appears to have picked up that strange censorial attitude noteworthy also in von Storch which presumes that because they do not believe that AGW will lead to catastrophe (which is a respectable position inside the consensus), that therefore scientists who do believe that it will (also a respectable position inside the consensus) must not state that belief in public.

And if supposed «respectable» persons like Mann are okay with dismissing eminent scientists as porno milfs, don't be surprised if it catches on:

If she were shilling and not a respectable climate scientist in her own regards, I'd understand the venom here, but she's just a researcher with some fairly mild objections.

During the segment, Stossel portrayed skepticism about global warming as just as scientifically valid as respectable scientific research and opinion showing that the climate is changing; misleadingly suggested that projections of the future global climate are comparable to a local news channel's «weather forecast»; and highlighted Crichton's claim that climate scientists have an incentive to exaggerate global warming in order to win grants.

The few sceptics concerning aspects of AGW science have little chance of being heard unless they are publishing scientists with a respectable track record.

«But we will try to put together some public sessions of those who are I would say «thoughtful critics» - very very respectable and highly thought of scientists with criticisms of the organisation - we definitely want to hear that.»