The other three — John Christy, a climate scientist at the University of Alabama; Judith Curry, a climatologist at the University of Georgia; and Richard Lindzen, an emeritus physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — are well -
respected by climate skeptics and are often challenged by the climate science establishment.
The other three — John Christy, a climate scientist at the University of Alabama; Judith Curry, a climatologist at the University of Georgia; and Richard Lindzen, an emeritus physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — are well -
respected by climate skeptics and are often challenged by the climate science establishment.
Not exact matches
If people then run into legitimate criticism of uncertainty and
climate policy
by well
respected skeptics (e.g.: Lindzen), then there is the danger that they will label your site as political and not scientific, and you could lose credibility in the eyes of some people.
A study of major U.S. newspapers found that up to 1994,
climate scientists who were highly
respected by their peers were cited considerably more frequently than the
skeptics associated with conservative think tanks, but after 1995, as the conservatives grew more active, newspapers cited the two groups about equally.
After all, that's why Richard is skeptical even with
respect to various «simple» answers about the causes of
climate change that have been proposed
by some of the
skeptics, most notably with
respect to cosmoclimatology.