Sentences with phrase «respected scientists from»

Let it therefore be noted that the magnitude of this hypothetical conspiracy would need to encompass many thousands of uncontroversial publications and respected scientists from around the world, stretching back through Arrhenius and Tyndall for almost 150 years.

More recently, papers published by respected scientists from the same university, differed on a key element of climate change science, but the study conducted by IPCC members suggesting acceleration of a trend that would impact global warming received the most attention.

He goes on to list examples from his two decades of work with six such organizations, including exclusion of respected scientists from meetings, successful attempts to manipulate contents of reports from scientific committee meetings and withholding of data.

Not exact matches

Pope: «We can go on all day quoting and counter-quoting scientists about god, but the reality is that most respected scientists and most smart people think that Christianity is a total fraud, quite apart from any deist or other god beliefs and speculations.»

AE, we can go on all day quoting and counterquoting scientists about god, but the reality is that most respected scientists and most smart people think that Christianity is a total fraud, quite apart from any deist or other god beliefs and speculations.

I studied math, physics, and engineering in college, graduated from a respected engineering school, and landed a job as a computer scientist in finance.

I still get excited when I hear the call of the gray tree frog from out back!Anyway, your approach of saying Regardless of where we think we came from, we're all in the same boat was very meaningful to me because I felt a measure of respect not usually afforded to evangelicals by scientists.

Firstly, there is a methodological similarity, at least in this important respect: that scientists in their theories and Thomas in his philosophy both start from the real, existing physical entity.

As Chairman of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee I have had the opportunity to hear from widely respected scientists on all sides of this question.

«The nation's incoming president will need to move quickly to appoint a respected scientist or engineer to serve as the next science adviser, to ensure immediate input related to science and technology,» Holt added, reinforcing the recommendations laid out in a September 2016 report from Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy.

The nation's incoming president needs to move quickly to appoint a respected scientist or engineer to serve as the next science adviser to ensure immediate input on issues related to science, according to recommendations laid out in a report from Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy...

The first tier contains items that many young scientists would expect from their supervisors: mentoring; communication; setting a direction and vision for the research group; providing opportunities to network with other scientists; providing funding for postdocs» research or giving them significant help in obtaining their own grants; training; creating a work culture and environment that encourages individuals to treat everybody with respect and encourages collaboration; creating an ambience that keeps group members satisfied and attracts talented scientists to the group; and offering postdocs opportunities to explore options for their careers once their fellowships have ended.

From this image, the scientists were able to track the dependence of the rate of tunneling ionization on the orientation of the molecule with respect to the laser polarization direction.

But the new evidence comes from a pair of respected planetary scientists, Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, who prepared for the inevitable skepticism with detailed analyses of the orbits of other distant objects and months of computer simulations.

The new evidence comes from a pair of respected planetary scientists, Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.

Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann called it «an interesting study from highly respected climate researchers» that highlights the need to reduce the use of fossil fuels quickly.

Scientists from MIPT are proudly known and respected, their work is appreciated and is often cited and rewarded, in some cases with the Nobel Prize.

«I appreciate the opportunity to describe the great efforts we made with Interstellar to keep it true to our understanding of the universe; and also our insistence that, wherever scientists are uncertain about the universe and its physical laws, we restrict Interstellar to speculations that emerge from real science and to ideas regarded by respected scientists as possible.»

But along with the preening admiration bestowed on Taylor from many of those most stridently rejecting climate science or any effort to manage climate risks, he also won the very begrudging respect of those mainstream climate scientists and policy advocates who, while admiring his communications savvy and stage presence, trashed what they dismissed as his pseudo-science proclamations.

A respected physician scientist, Dr. Lindau has a master's degree in public policy from the University of Chicago.

At the time, two respected British scientists, Robert Briggs and Thomas King, were trying to answer this question by transferring a frog cell's nucleus, the DNA repository, into a fertilized frog egg from which the original instructions had been removed.

In this respect, EC cells from teratocarcinomas resemble embryonic stem (ES) cells from normal animals, which scientists knew existed, but could not isolate.

But it has been published in a supposedly peer - reviewed science journal by a famous and distinguished scientist from the University of Sydney, a highly respected institution.

A group of scientists from a respected Cleveland university is endorsing a candidate for the Ohio state board of education because the incumbent he's opposing has voted against teaching evolution in the state's schools.

The Cannon Beach History Center & Museum is honored welcome adventurer, scientist, writer, and archaeologist Dr. Cameron M. Smith on Thursday May 9th, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. Dr. Smith has a PhD in Archaeology from Canada's Simon Fraser University and is a respected scholar, who has published scientific works in the American Journal of Physical -LSB-...]

WASHINGTON, DC — MARCH 1, 2018 — 36 internationally renowned and respected mental health experts, leading social scientists and academics from research centers and universities — including Oxford University, Johns Hopkins University, Stockholm University and The University of Sydney — will oppose, in an upcoming journal paper, the World Health Organization's (WHO) plan to create a new gaming disorder classification.

Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann called it «an interesting study from highly respected climate researchers» that highlights the need to reduce the use of fossil fuels quickly.

quoting from the article: Pope Benedict XVI urged bishops, scientists and politicians to «respect creation» while «focusing on the needs of sustainable development.»

There are some interesting quotes from climate scientists in this article that highlight a large degree of uncertainty with respect to the climate system, and the human role in it, even among scientists closely involved with the IPCC reports.

The chairman and another member of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, in an apparent effort to discredit the findings reported by three distinguished scientists from respected universities, demanded that the scientists send Congress all of the scientific data they have gathered in their entire careers, even data on studies unrelated to their publications on global warming.

From Katharine Hayhoe, who I deeply respect, and from John Cook (*), scientists and the quantitative community have been scolded that the reason they don't make headway with the public and the science denier community is because their explanations are too... Continue readiFrom Katharine Hayhoe, who I deeply respect, and from John Cook (*), scientists and the quantitative community have been scolded that the reason they don't make headway with the public and the science denier community is because their explanations are too... Continue readifrom John Cook (*), scientists and the quantitative community have been scolded that the reason they don't make headway with the public and the science denier community is because their explanations are too... Continue reading →

Of course I respect that some individual scientists disagree with that, but from a political point of view, that should not carry too much weight.

As a Fellow of the Geological Society of America (GSA), I periodically blog on their open forum and on their Climate Community website and among other things, I have been accused of «being on the payroll of the Koch brothers,» and when posting a link to Svensmark's video on clouds accused of doing science by u-tube,» and a few other choice things from so - called respected «scientists.»

Simon Singh wrote a rebuttal in his own blog, yet in the the comments there arose an excellent rebuttal to the programs description of «hide the decline» from a respected scientist Paul Dennis who is also at the University of East Anglia

Two weeks ago, just prior to the start of these negotiations, numerous credible reports were published by an array of well respected scientists, economists and climate change experts, all with essentially the same conclusion - we are currently on an unsustainable path which virtually guarantees the world will be faced with catastrophic effects from climate change, according to Greenpeace International executive director, Kumi Naidoo.

As you said in post # 25 «If a consensus of respected mathematicians and scientists from outside the field of climatology...» That's something I'm going to be hard pushed to be!

«The authors write that «the Mediterranean region is one of the world's most vulnerable areas with respect to global warming,»... they thus consider it to be extremely important to determine what impact further temperature increases might have on the storminess of the region... produced a high - resolution record of paleostorm events along the French Mediterranean coast over the past 7000 years... from the sediment bed of Pierre Blanche Lagoon [near Montpellier, France]... nine French scientists, as they describe it, «recorded seven periods of increased storm activity at 6300 - 6100, 5650 - 5400, 4400 - 4050, 3650 - 3200, 2800 - 2600, 1950 - 1400, and 400 - 50 cal yr BP,» the latter of which intervals they associate with the Little Ice Age.

If a consensus of respected mathematicians and scientists from outside the field of climatology and with no preconceived views on climate change tell me that the basis of the IPCC TAR is valid (not possibly or probably valid), I will start to worry about climate change.

This question is designed to expose that those politicians who refuse to reduce their government's ghg on the basis that they are not scientists can not ethically justify non-action on climate change on this basis because once they are put on notice by respected scientific organizations that ghg from their government jurisdiction are harming others, they have a duty to prevent dangerous behavior or establish credible scientific evidence that the alleged dangerous behavior is safe.

It would help if the participants were respected scientists who were removed from the climate wars.

Many of the promoters of this are (IMO) men who felt they never got the respect they were due from other scientists, who they were sure they were smarter than.

While there do exist scientists who don't use research tools, they don't get a lot of respect from the scientists who do.

Already one respected US climate scientist, Dr Eduardo Zorita, has called for Dr Mann and Dr Jones to be barred from any further participation in the IPCC.

I know this is repeated — but it is from one in particular of the most respected climate scientists in the world.

On March 18, 18 respected rainforest scientists from Brazil, the U.S., and the U.K. issued a lengthy statement reaffirming the IPCC's conclusion that up to 40 percent of the Amazon rainforest is at risk because of climate change.

Their arguments are few: • I haven't seen real change in Iowa, just the usual variability (from an Iowa farmer) • there is disagreement among respected scientists, so I can take whatever position I want and run with it, loudly and forcefully (a popular argument in all discussions, although scientists in the same position often become less assertive about their position).

I think you will find an overwhelming level of respect (and relief) from most commenters here when an open - minded, non-agenda-driven scientist shows up.

He is a real scientist, respecting views different from his, and a great Editor, not censoring papers that contrast mainstream views.

At the same time, I support Ryan O.'s concern about the need for quantitative arguments; I find personal attacks unacceptable in a scientific discussion; finally, from my experience I think that exposure of one's research to specialists in different fields can be extremely productive, to say nothing about the fact that as scientists are working for the humanity, speaking with educated human beings the scientist is speaking with the ultimate consumer of his / her work, which entails both sides to a mutual respect.

But it is no wonder that scientists shy away from delving any further into the political sphere — take, for example, Senator James Inhofe (R - Oklahoma), who called for the prosecution of respected climate scientists by the Justice Department, attacking the integrity and character of these scientists because his political ideology does not match their findings.