Not exact matches
For advocates
of an elected chamber, there is a point
of principle — nothing wrong with that, far from it — but as such, neither
side is likely to convince the other
of the
respective merits
of their
case — to agree to disagree is as far as we shall get.
You'll find the power button, micro-USB port, headset jack and volume rocker along the left
side of the slate, peeking through their
respective openings in the
case.
As I understand this Rule, at least on the family court
side, ENE will now provide party - litigants and their attorneys with a process for «test - driving» their
respective positions before a selected ENE «evaluator» and receive, among other things, «in a family court
case... the likely result
of a trial
of all issues».
It is not uncommon for both
sides of the
case to do accident reconstruction to prove their
respective cases.
The same goes for both
sides» witnesses (both personal and professional): each
of you dukes it out through conflicting testimony and attempts to make your
respective case look more believable.