Learn to make sense of the science and to
respond to climate change denial.
Not exact matches
Responding to the public's awareness of anthropogenic
climate change, American Petroleum Institute's (API) 1996 «Reinventing Energy: Making the Right Choices,» supported
climate denial and argued for inaction.
I asked you
to be precise and you
respond with a «definition» of
climate change denial, when the term you used was
climate change denier.
As we have seen, in the first two entries in this series, the new book edited by sociologists Dunlap and Brulle includes information on how participants in the
denial countermovement have prevented governments from
responding to climate change by undermining the scientific basis on which claims about the urgent need
to take action.
«A growing number of corporations are moving beyond
denial to acceptance and action on
climate change, some seeking competitive advantage by anticipating rather than
responding to future policy
changes.»
We explain the psychological drivers of
denial, debunk many of the most common myths about
climate change and explore the scientific research into how
to respond to climate misinformation.
It was a wonderful metaphor
responding to the
climate denial myth that we need absolute certainty before we can take action on
climate change.
Plimer challenged Monbiot
to a face -
to - face debate: Monbiot
responded in «Why can't the champion of
climate change denial face the music?»
The fossil fuel industry has
responded to these suits by fiercely waging a campaign that claims that any legal action against the fossil fuel companies for funding organizations engaged in
climate change denial activities is tantamount to a legally inappropriate suppression of free speech (See: Climate change vs. free speech: Punishing fossil fuel companies for expressing
climate change denial activities is tantamount
to a legally inappropriate suppression of free speech (See:
Climate change vs. free speech: Punishing fossil fuel companies for expressing
Climate change vs. free speech: Punishing fossil fuel companies for expressing doubt).