Meanwhile, should local schools perform higher than expected, as they may for at least
some respondents living in districts in the upper half of the national rankings, then the opposite pattern of results may emerge.
Among
respondents living in districts that spend less than $ 9,440 ($ 3,000 below the average district), 61 % of uninformed respondents support higher spending, just 12 percentage points above such views among the uninformed.
Not exact matches
It estimates that expenditures average $ 6,680 per pupil, hardly more than 50 percent of the average actual expenditure level of $ 12,637 per pupil
in the
districts where
respondents live.
The survey is supplemented by a separately collected data set on the demographics and academic performance of the school
districts in which each
respondent lives.
When we asked
respondents to estimate per pupil spending
in their local school
district, the average response
in 2016 was $ 7,020, little more than 50 % of the actual per pupil expenditure of $ 12,440, on average,
in the
districts in which
respondents lived.
A one percentile increase
in actual performance
in the
district in which the
respondent lived was associated with an increase of roughly 0.4 percentile points
in the
respondent's estimate.
Informed
respondents living in above - average
districts, however, actually back higher salaries for teachers (if uninformed of current levels) and give greater support to teachers unions.
Over half of
respondents said they'd upgrade to a better neighborhood and 40 percent chose a better school
district to
live in.