Economists think of GARP as basically the test which asks, «Are humans
responding in a rational way to prices?»
Not exact matches
Investors are
responding to them
in a
rational, measured
way by moving out of growth and momentum - driven names and into more value - priced, high quality stocks.
Successive Puerto Rican governments
responded to demand for their debt
in the economically
rational way — they borrowed an unusually large amount of money.
The agape of God has come to us
in a
way which transcends our
rational grasp and our human powers to
respond.
Meanwhile, after their man won the Labour leadership race and the Party moved closer to their political agenda, soft left pressure group Compass
responded in the only
rational way possible: by walking away from the Party.
Certainly, no
rational writer / editor / author would
respond in such a
way.
It won't be possible to just publish accurate scientific information about anthropogenic climate forcing and leave it at that, and expect the general public to
respond in a prudent and
rational way.
The reason I'm concerned that we won't
respond to this global threat
in a
rational way is that huge amounts of intellectual and writing talent are being exerted to make sure we don't.