Sentences with phrase «responding to questions so»

Practice responding to these questions so you'll feel confident when it matters most.

Because so many of our Tech Team members responded to the question so passionately and so informatively, we've divided their comments into two articles.

Because so many of our Tech Team members responded to the question so passionately and so informatively, we divided their comments into two articles.

I wanted to think about how to respond to your question so took a little while over the weekend to ponder this.

Not exact matches

Responding to a question about whether his companies had suffered blowback over his stated politics, Thiel said, «I don't think so.»

It's my last day as your interim proprietor, so thank you for being such a terrific audience, for responding to my questions and ~ hopefully ~ laughing at my jokes!

We're not talking here about just about customer service, responding to customer - initiated questions, complaints, returns, exchanges, adjustments, and the like (although doing so courteously and efficiently is certainly critical to any company's survival).

I am here today to address several issues that have been specifically raised before this committee, and I appreciate the opportunity to respond to questions as fully as I am able to do so.

I was the last on the panel to respond so I had time to really reflect on the question and on the early days of my company, Work Market.

Trump responds to question «Why don't I just fire Mueller» «Many people have said you should fire him... we'll see what happens, I think this is disgraceful and so do a lot of other people, this is a pure and simple witch hunt» pic.twitter.com/llJrXhig4 2

«The knee - jerk instinct is to respond that when a proven strategy is so exceedingly out of favor that its viability is questioned, the cycle must be about to turn around.

They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.

Baidu did not respond to Sixth Tone's other questions, including why it had opted for a look that was so similar to «CryptoKitties.»

The companies surveyed - the biggest or most internationally - focused banks, insurers, asset managers, private equity firms and exchanges in Britain - were responding to questions about their plans in the event of a so - called «hard» Brexit, where the UK would leave not only the EU but also the single market and Customs Union.

This part almost made me not want to respond at all, when you so clearly are not actually asking a question but instead trying to antagonize people... If someone says, «I am God!»

That's how he can respond to so many people at once, he doesn't actually answer questions or defend his position honestly.

So many people in here NEVER respond to questions.

T, let me ask you a question, and I tell you what, I won't even respond to your answer, so you don't have to contend with me, a pharisee.

When I suggested that he was grievously mistaken, he responded, as he had to Woodward's doubts about his stance on abortion, not so much by refuting the argument as by rebuffing the individual who had the gall to question his wisdom.

Tony Jones has had a lot of opportunities then and since to be specific in responding to (what I see as) legitimate questions — as he was and is a public figure — but rarely has done so online, at least to my knowledge.

You posed some challenging questions to Robert, and I'm so pleased with the gracious and thoughtful way he responded to them.

«We don't know what the questions are going to be so we respond to people and sometimes those questions can be quite challenging.»

Yesterday, Edward Fudge responded to your questions about conditionalism (sometimes called annihilationism)-- the view that immortality is conditional upon belief in Jesus Christ, so the unsaved will ultimately be destroyed and cease to exist rather than suffer eternally in hell.

Though my father had a degree in theology, he knew that having all the right answers wasn't really the point, so when I would pose a particularly personal or challenging question to him, he would often respond with, «You know what, Rachel — I don't know, but I know that God loves you.»

So I don't see either one just beginning to ask the question here and that was what I was responding to.

Most people I know respond positively to the question «So you like Jesus, but but not the church?»

A spokewoman for his company told the Post that their questions «veer into manufactured questions so grossly false and insinuating that I am concerned even responding to these fake connotations provides them the patina of reality.»

I will let Paul respond to your question: «And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad — in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls — 12 she was told, «The older will serve the younger.»

But before we come to that discussion, it will be useful for us to turn our attention to the question of «resurrection» — first, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, about which so much of the earliest Christian writing found in the New Testament, and so much of the Christian experience of discipleship, turns; and second, to consider the point of the continuing Christian affirmation that those who have responded to the event of Christ are themselves made «sharers in Christ's resurrection».

Earlier this month, Edward Fudge responded to your questions about conditionalism (sometimes called annihilationism)-- the view that immortality is conditional upon belief in Jesus Christ, so the unsaved will ultimately be destroyed and cease to exist rather than suffer eternally in hell.

I'll be at my computer for the rest of the day working on Book # 2, so if you have any writing - related questions, just leave them in the comment section and I'll be available to respond until 11 p.m. Happy writing!

The vision is only a sort of shock for Isaiah, so that he will respond positively to the question: «Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?»

This comes surprisingly close to saying that Manuel II got it right when he claimed that Islam had been spread by the sword; and it does prompt an important question: of those many Muslims who took offence at the Pope's use of Manuel II's words, why did so few of them respond that he was in error, since Islam is essentially a religion of peace?

So I'd like to extend a special invitation to pastor spouses / partners to join Jim and Jodie by responding to one more of these questions yourselves, from your experience.

So Jennifer Knapp did an amazing job responding to your questions from last week!

We were only able to answer a few of your questions in the video, so I've gone back through the comments after yesterday's post to respond to the questions we don't tackle here.

So the question arises: Could Jesus have responded to his destiny with laughter?

This book is written for Christian educators, trainers, teachers, and lay people who are facing the question: «How can we say what we mean about God so that our assertions will be understood, accepted, and responded to?»

Every now and then, people actually ask my opinion before I've had a chance to give it to them for free, so I thought I'd respond to some questions I've received regarding John McCain's running mate, Sarah Palin.

The point of the story is that the preacher's sermon and the church's sermons (the messages born in each of the hearers) resulted from the minister's having heard and responded to the theological question implicit in the sculptress's remark, «I am so happy, it's sinful.»

I've gotten a lot of questions about the biblical womanhood project over the past few months, and I thought it might be fun to bring Dan in on a video post so we can respond to them together.

Earlier this week, Edward Fudge responded to your questions about conditionalism (sometimes called annihilationism)-- the view that immortality is conditional upon belief in Jesus Christ, so the unsaved will ultimately be destroyed and cease to exist rather than suffer eternally in hell.

In a sense the answer to this question will respond to our own inquiry as to why teleological thinking seems so implausible today.

There have been so many comments and questions on this series that I promised I would try to respond to some.

So sorry I didn't respond to your question in a timely manner.

hi dave, thank you so much for responding to my previous question.

I have over 1300 comments so I'm trying to make it easier for responding and finding the answer to any questions.

You are so thoughtful to respond to almost every comment even when it's been a repeat question!

Hi Holly, I'm so sorry not to respond to your question the day it was posted.

Thank you for your recipes and being so kind in responding to everyone's questions and comments.