Not exact matches
He knew that the instinctive
response from journalists would be to cry foul, and to mount our horses in defense
of free speech, truth, and justice.
The prestige media is generally blind to its own belligerency in the culture war; it champions as courageous the exercise
of free speech that is vituperative and slanderous while simultaneously calling for civility, and condemning as uncivil even the measured
responses of those who are slandered.
Unfortunately freedom
of speech is contingent to how much money you have given that the media is itself a business that has to make profits as well, so a «lobbyist» like this comes to this program without any ethics, without any remorse but with a lot
of money as well to openly acknowledge that: yes, we put money in this governor's elections, we are expecting he pay us back and will stand on our side
of the equation, and yes, we have collected (very fast) the private necessary money to run a public relations campaign (
of lies if necessary) to guarantee that our privileges are well kept; and he finds a
free stand to speak out freely and without appropriate
response As far as Liz, I'm not sure if it is only a being naïve issue.
Responsibility is not an end to freedom
of speech, but on the contrary, a
free response of to the very challenge that existence confronts us with.
PewDiePie's use
of the n - word and Campo Santo's
response has triggered a massive wave
of debate as some worry whether Campo Santo's filing
of a DMCA takedown notice was perhaps a step too far, while others have expressed worry that PewDiePie's negative behavior will affect the YouTube platform as a whole, and still others have even defended PewDiePie in a misguided defense
of free speech.
During his tenure as a senior executive at ESA, he orchestrated the government affairs component
of ESA's historic U.S. Supreme Court
free speech victory, and led the industry's strategic and tactical campaign in
response to recent legislative challenges to the industry's creative expression and distribution model.
She seems to think that
free speech and becoming a political activist are something that she or Lennart Bengtsson are not just entitled to, which they are
of course, but that this also includes the right to not be critisized and counteracted by the political decisions by other then in
response.
Here are our guest attorney's
responses to a handful
of divorce, custody,
free speech, and second amendment questions.