I was engaged in a helpful conversation with an Inc. 500 head of sales in
response to my article pointing out the differences between buyer profiling and buyer personas.
But surely saying that the system is also abused by landlords is not a particularly thoughtful
response to an article pointing out — fairly — that the system can be and is abused by tenants.
Not exact matches
In her
response article, Brooks stresses this
point, the fact there is a «need
to talk about polygamy,» six times.
Although there are other
points in Neville's provocative
article which perhaps ought
to be taken up, I do not feel that this
response should become another book!
(huge eyeroll — obviously I'm not impressed) I addressed this because it was your # 1
point in
response to the
article with respect
to the NT.
I am grateful for the opportunity
to do two things in
response: first,
to clear up a misunderstanding that my
article may have suggested; and second,
to reemphasize one of the main
points of the piece — namely, that pacifists have a very difficult time trying
to think in just war terms.
The five
points of TULIP Calvinism developed as a
response to the five
Articles of Remonstrance put forward by the followers of Jacobus Arminius.
In a fine
article analysing various aspects of baptism, Dagmar Heller
points out that» [t] he greatest divergence evident in the
responses [of the churches
to the BEM document [4]-RSB- concerns the question of the practice of infant baptism over against the practice of adult baptism.»
I wish
to make two
points about the «Marian problem» in
response to Timothy George's excellent
article «Evangelicals and the Mother of God.»
Moreover in the interests of dismissing potential criticism that this
article is, no matter how much I may deny it, merely a backlash from the Swansea defeat, I will finally make the
point that the premise of the
article was conceived in early January and thus can not be considered an immediate
response to Liverpool's abject display at Swansea.
At a
point I had
to respond in similar fashion with my article «OPEN LETTER TO MANASSEH AZURE AWUNI» in response to your plethora of insults in the issue of the doctors» strike somewhere last year (Ref: Ghanaweb.co
to respond in similar fashion with my
article «OPEN LETTER
TO MANASSEH AZURE AWUNI» in response to your plethora of insults in the issue of the doctors» strike somewhere last year (Ref: Ghanaweb.co
TO MANASSEH AZURE AWUNI» in
response to your plethora of insults in the issue of the doctors» strike somewhere last year (Ref: Ghanaweb.co
to your plethora of insults in the issue of the doctors» strike somewhere last year (Ref: Ghanaweb.com)
In January 2010, Michael F. Holick, MD PhD, a vitamin D researcher whose work I have cited in previous
articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting
point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the National Institutes of Health, made a direct
response to Dr. Cannell and his colleagues in the pages of the same journal.
In January 2010, Michael F. Hollick, MD PhD, a vitamin D researcher whose work I have cited in previous
articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting
point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the NIH, made a direct
response to Dr. Cannell and his colleaugues in the pages of the same journal.
Furthermore, I
pointed out in the blog that several
responses to the
article cited factual errors regarding the anatomical and physiological statements Mr. Broad made, and I included links
to those
responses for folks interested in delving into these more technical aspects in the
article.
So here's the
point of my posting a comment in
response to this
article.
In
response to CR's recent protein supplement
article, Greg Pickett, founder of Cytosport (maker of Musclemilk), made the valid
point that,
This
article is going
to help you increase the
responses to your online dating emails by
pointing out five common mistakes that are turning that potential special someone into another missed opportunity.
The CRP
response to our Ed Next
article points out that the authors of the CRP report did consider the city as a unit of comparison and present the results in Table 22 on page 63 of the original report.
A comment from frequent London - based novelist Lexi Revellian, for example, follows Ruffilo's
article, with this
response to his
point about needing «an editor, a cover designer, a web designer» and so on:
So I was happy
to see a Letter
to the Editor written in
response to Shiller's recent
article (Rising Anxiety that Stocks Are Overpriced) that makes the essential
point succinctly and yet...
In
response to Logan Jenkins» column «Blaming the breed would be a misdeed, says owner of Petey, a smart, gentle pit bull» (Local, June 27): I fully understand those who fear and loathe this breed, but as it is so clearly
pointed out in Jenkins»
article, the fault lies with those who utilize the breed
to create that horrible and irresponsible aura.
I really just intended
to point out the math thing and now I've got a whole critical
response brewing on virtually every
point in this
article.
In your
response to # 30, you appear
to misrepresent P. Michael's
article, in which he clearly
points out that the 0.75 oC estimate is for the next 50 years (from Oct. 2003), not over the coming century.
[
Response: Well, if the blatherers bothered
to read the
articles they were citing, they might understand the
point.
Although you say > [
Response: We considered responding directly
to the WSJ
article, > but felt that a
point - by -
point rebuttal wasn't warranted.
I want
to explain my position on this subject: It's great
to use links
to refer
to published work, news
articles, or other peoples essays, but I think it's not when you
point to your own blog where you in effect post a
response to RC.
As Will Steffen
points out in his earlier
response, it would have been scientifically more correct for Ellis et al.
to refer not only
to their own assessment of uncertainties regarding a potential biosphere tipping
point but also
to the
response to their
article by Terry Hughes et al. (2014).
But while they're adding extras, bus companies might also do well
to push one of their long - standing selling
points, which commenter Garrett Bradford eloquently describes in
response to TheCityFix.com
article: «It may take a bit or, really, quite longer, but I like a good bus ride.
The
point of the
article was
to demonstrate that the seasonal temperature
response varies by altitude.
I don't have time
to deal with every one of the mistakes his
article contains — it takes 100 times as long
to show why a claim is wrong as it does
to make it — but here's a quick breakdown, beginning with the first sentence: (I've been able
to pull this together with the help of the Climate Science Rapid
Response Team, which put me in touch with the relevant scientists and
pointed me
to the primary datasets.)
But, as Geoffrey Redick
points out in a humorous
article for LifeHacker Offspring, a parent's
response has a significant effect on a child, which is why you need
to teach them
to stay calm and reasonable, despite your own inward panicking.
For his account of events and
responses to some of the
points in Fred Pearce's
article, see this blog on RealClimate.org.»
Point by point these articles by Dana Priest and William Arkin reveal what is to me a sad tale of madness, of a nation suffering from the political equivalent of some auto - immune disease where the response to invasion is unregulated growth and self destruc
Point by
point these articles by Dana Priest and William Arkin reveal what is to me a sad tale of madness, of a nation suffering from the political equivalent of some auto - immune disease where the response to invasion is unregulated growth and self destruc
point these
articles by Dana Priest and William Arkin reveal what is
to me a sad tale of madness, of a nation suffering from the political equivalent of some auto - immune disease where the
response to invasion is unregulated growth and self destruction.
Kevin O'Keefe followed with a
point - by -
point response to Tincher's
article.
After the initial publication, Mr. Kent
pointed out errors in the
article and asked the news organization
to publish his written
response, but it refused.
Do a quick read and then come back, as we want
to share some
points of our own in
response to the
article.