However, we do track cases in which the rights and
responsibilities of jurors may play a key role.
Not exact matches
I doubt that any
juror among us believed that the defendant was innocent
of all involvement in the brutal robbery and murder
of a Christian layman discharging his
responsibilities.
A side advantage
of this is that capital murder cases take up a lot
of a
juror's time, so splitting the
responsibility among multiple
jurors is more fair to people doing compulsory jury duty.
While the Fully Informed Jury Association takes no position on this case, we are following it closely as the case relates to issues
of jurors» rights and
responsibilities.
In light
of this brief summary, and paraphrasing Justice Fish's point from Krieger, one could perhaps say that
jurors have the
responsibility as a matter
of right to assess evidence and apply the law as set out by the trial judge, but also enjoy the power to refuse to apply the law «when their consciences permit
of no other course».
If
jurors only had the official
responsibility set out by the trial judge in Stanley, their ethical duties would be straightforward, and very similar to those
of a judge — to be impartial, diligent, principled, respectful
of equality, and fair in their assessment
of the evidence in light
of the law set out by the trial judge.
The trial in New Haven had several factors that can aggravate
jurors» stress: multiple victims including children, sexual assault, graphic evidence and — as a capital case — the
responsibility of deciding whether a defendant should live or die, jury scholar Valerie Hans said.