I think that is a part of
my responsibility as a bishop.
Not exact matches
I also thought the statement on the Iraq War, issued by outgoing president Bishop William Skylstad and approved by the conference, was a thoughtful teaching exercise in which,
as I put it on the First Things website, the
bishops «neither exceed their competence nor shirk their
responsibility.»
The promiscuous position - taking of documents such
as «Political
Responsibility» is quite unwarranted by any peculiar competence of
bishops or church bureaucracies.
The
responsibility of
bishops is and always has been,
as Archbishop Raymond Burke of St. Louis and other
bishops have explained in great detail, to protect the integrity of the sacrament, to prevent public scandal that creates confusion about the Church's teaching, and to avoid the danger of people receiving the sacrament,
as St. Paul puts it, to their damnation.
Among the points made was that, despite the
bishops» declared intention, a statement such
as «Political
Responsibility,» issued by the United States Catholic Conference (USCC), is in fact a political platform, and it inevitably presents the Catholic Church
as but another political interest group.
Since it sees the mandate
as a relationship between the
bishop and the theologian rather than the university, the Bevilacqua proposal also places the
responsibility for securing the mandate on the Catholic theologian, not on the university.
The key concept here is that the
bishop of Rome,
as the first in the ecclesiastical «taxis», the order of the local churches and their pastors, has a
responsibility for ensuring the harmonious functioning of that taxis
as a whole.
The
bishops seem to see American society and its institutions
as a market rather than a community united by a common culture — a place where strangers work and pursue their economic interests, not a society where people share common bonds and shared
responsibilities.
That also gives a great sense of the
responsibility,
as people do look to their
bishop to be a source of hope.
Bishop Mortimer Arias spoke of evangelism
as the primary calling and
responsibility of the churches and drew equally on the Lausanne Congress and the Roman Catholic Synod of
Bishops as evidence.
After 25 years in seminary education, Clymer is particularly well equipped to handle his present
responsibilities as chairman of the committee which functions
as a liaison between the church's Council of
Bishops and the denomination's ten seminaries.
The Encyclical Ut unum sint lists among the five still controversial areas: «I) the relationship between Sacred Scripture,
as the highest authority in matter of faith, and Sacred Tradition,
as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God,» and «4) the Magisterium of the Church, entrusted to the Pope and the
Bishops in communion with him, understood
as a
responsibility and an authority exercised in the name of Christ for teaching and safeguarding the faith.»
Toward the end of Ut Unum Sint, John Paul cites some of the questions that must be addressed in conversation with the communities issuing from the tragic divisions of the sixteenth century: (1) The relationship between Sacred Scripture,
as the highest authority in matters of faith, and Sacred Tradition,
as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God; (2) The Eucharist
as the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ, an offering of praise to the Father, the sacrificial memorial and Real Presence of Christ and the sanctifying outpouring of the Holy Spirit; (3) Ordination,
as a Sacrament, to the threefold ministry of the episcopate, presbyterate, and diaconate; (4) The Magisterium of the Church, entrusted to the pope and the
bishops in communion with him, understood
as a
responsibility and an authority exercised in the name of Christ for teaching and safeguarding the faith; (5) The Virgin Mary,
as Mother of God and Icon of the Church, the spiritual Mother who intercedes for Christ's disciples and for all humanity.
He had lost his ability to communicate effectively, and communication,
as in being a teacher, is the first
responsibility of a
bishop.
The idea that
bishops are pastors who have a
responsibility for the soul welfare also of politicians, the idea that
bishops are to help also politicians to form their consciences in accord with their professed beliefs» such ideas are dismissed
as a pious guise for partisan power plays.
The
bishops don't have this problem; it's time that they took some
responsibility for their people,
as they are supposed to be pastors, or shepherds of them, and they are supposed to serve them, towel in hand.
So the recommendations of Luther's Prelude on the Babylonian Captivity of the Church were being realised; if the officials of the Myth, the Christian
bishops and priests, would not themselves reform the Church then secular officials would do it,
as Christians with the
responsibility to act in society.
He said, «My statements to the press were misconstrued and misrepresented but I take full
responsibility for this
as I tender my unreserved apology to the Catholic
bishops and by extension my Christian brothers and sisters who are displeased with my statement on tithing.