Sentences with phrase «responsibility between member states»

They are based on Articles 78 TFEU, which empowers the EU to pass laws benefiting states overwhelmed by a sudden inflow of migrants, and Article 80 TFEU, which stipulates that such decisions must be governed by the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility between Member States.

Fulfilling this precept, Article 80 determines that this policy is governed by the solidarity principle and by the share of the responsibilities between Member States, including in the financial plan, and if necessary, the acts adopted by the EU in executing it policy «shall contain appropriate measures to give effect to this principle».

Not exact matches

Dr. Haldar told a SUNY RF audit team member that the employee in question «performed the out of state work for SoloPower while simultaneously performing his responsibilities in support» of the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Consortium (PVMC), a jointly controlled, $ 62.5 million nonprofit partnership between SUNY RF and SEMATECH (itself a nonprofit consortium) backed by the U.S. Department of Energy.

The Court expressly recognised that the application of this principle leads to the establishment of a clear distinction between beneficiaries of policies and the rest of the Member States, which should accept the responsibility of sharing the burden carried by the beneficiaries even if that sharing is not compatible with their national interests (para. 293 of the Judgment).

In that document, the application of the principle of solidarity between EU Member States in the immigration domain is made conditional upon the responsibility of the beneficiaries of this principle to undertake all possible measures in order to reduce their burden, which should be shared with other states conforming with the duty of solidarity (p. 3 of the ReStates in the immigration domain is made conditional upon the responsibility of the beneficiaries of this principle to undertake all possible measures in order to reduce their burden, which should be shared with other states conforming with the duty of solidarity (p. 3 of the Restates conforming with the duty of solidarity (p. 3 of the Report).

My view is that it would be disproportionate to infer from this occasio a shift in the division of responsibility for guaranteeing the fundamental rights between the Union and the Member States.

He has previously published, amongst others, in European Business Law Review and Transnational Dispute Management on conflicts of investor - State dispute settlement with the EU principle of autonomy and the attribution of international responsibility in investment disputes between EU and its Member States.

Judgments given before the date of application of this Regulation but after the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 in proceedings instituted before the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 shall be recognised and enforced in accordance with the provisions of Chapter III of this Regulation provided they relate to divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment or parental responsibility for the children of both spouses on the occasion of these matrimonial proceedings and that jurisdiction was founded on rules which accorded with those provided for either in Chapter II of this Regulation or in Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 or in a convention concluded between the Member State of origin and the Member State addressed which was in force when the proceedings were instituted.

This means that jurisdiction should lie in the first place with the Member State of the child's habitual residence, except for certain cases of a change in the child's residence or pursuant to an agreement between the holders of parental responsibility.

Please note that EC Regulation 2201/2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgements in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility is the relevant law within the European Union and it includes and adds to the provisions and protections of the 1980 Hague Convention in relation to situations of international child abduction between EU Member States.

• EC Regulation 2201/2003 concerning state and the recognition and enforcement of judgements in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility — This Regulation further enhances and strengthens the provisions and protections of the 1980 Hague Convention in relation to situations of international child abduction between EU Member States.