Not exact matches
Alonso served as CEO of Baltimore City Public Schools (City Schools)
for six years, where he led a reform effort marked by a rebalancing of authority and
responsibility among stakeholders, the building of a coalition in support of City Schools, leading edge labor contracts, and a focus on individual students and teaching and
learning that yielded marked
improvement in achievement and climate data across all levels, the first increases in enrollment in 40 years, and widespread political and ground root support
for what have been divisive reform strategies in other districts.
In Kelly School, which is discussed in the book, these characteristics were built through a set of interrelated organizational routines including close monitoring of each student's academic progress, an explicit link between students» outcomes and teachers» practices, weekly 90 - minute professional development meetings focused on instructional
improvement, and the cultivation of a formal and informal discourse emphasizing high expectations, cultural responsiveness, and teachers»
responsibility for student
learning.
Those high - performing schools did things like «set measurable goals on standards based tests and benchmark tests across all proficiency levels, grades, and subjects»; create school missions that were «future oriented,» with curricula and instruction designed to prepare students to succeed in a rigorous high - school curriculum; include
improvement of student outcomes «as part of the evaluation of the superintendent, the principal, and the teachers»; and communicate to parents and students «their
responsibility as well
for student
learning, including parent contracts, turning in homework, attending class, and asking
for help when needed.»
«The idea of a
Learning Club,» says Joyce Jackson, a teacher of 30 years who works with Kentucky's Division of School Improvement, «is that responsibility for learning and implementing new techniques is
Learning Club,» says Joyce Jackson, a teacher of 30 years who works with Kentucky's Division of School
Improvement, «is that
responsibility for learning and implementing new techniques is
learning and implementing new techniques is shared.
Teachers working in teams have primary
responsibility for analyzing evidence of student
learning and developing strategies
for improvement.
This paper seeks to clarify the
responsibilities of policy makers to create the conditions
for an effective accountability system that produces substantial
improvements in student
learning, strengthens the teaching profession, and provides transparency of results to the public.
Research behind VAL - ED (the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education tool to assess principal performance, developed by researchers at Vanderbilt University) suggests that there are six key steps - or «processes» - that the effective principal takes when carrying out his or her most important leadership
responsibilities: planning, implementing, supporting, advocating, communicating and monitoring.40 The school leader pressing
for high academic standards would,
for example, map out rigorous targets
for improvements in
learning (planning), get the faculty on board to do what's necessary to meet those targets (implementing), encourage students and teachers in meeting the goals (supporting), challenge low expectations and low district funding
for students with special needs (advocating), make sure families are aware of the
learning goals (communicating), and keep on top of test results (monitoring).41
Absent a district structure
for teacher leadership, work collaboratively with teachers to conduct a school needs assessment to determine gaps in leadership; identify multiple and varied formal or informal leadership opportunities; and provide flexible scheduling and additional compensation that would allow teachers to take on increased
responsibility for professional
learning, curriculum, or school
improvement activities.
The
learning agenda contributes to a school culture necessary to sustain continuous
improvement as well as shared
responsibility for schoolwide success.
The study, which analysed the results of different methods of teaching maths in three American high schools, found that an approach that involved students not being divided into ability groups, but being given a shared
responsibility for each other's
learning, led to a significant
improvement in the achievements of high and low achieving students.
Learning communities: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal al
Learning communities: Professional
learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal al
learning that increases educator effectiveness and results
for all students occurs within
learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal al
learning communities committed to continuous
improvement, collective
responsibility, and goal alignment.
Discover the leadership
responsibilities that are most strongly connected to student achievement and
learn practical strategies to develop a purposeful, positive school community, initiate and manage change within your school, and choose the right focus
for your school's
improvement initiatives.
The TAP System
for Teacher and Student Advancement is implemented in school districts across the country, affecting approximately 15,000 teachers and 200,000 students.46 With support from the National Institute
for Excellence in Teaching, school districts create multiple career paths
for teachers, including career, mentor, and master teacher.47 Teacher leaders participate in school leadership teams with administrators, provide colleagues with regular professional
learning opportunities and individualized coaching, observe and provide feedback
for instructional
improvement, and are compensated
for these additional
responsibilities.48 Trained teacher leaders in schools using the TAP System have demonstrated an ability to evaluate classroom instruction with accuracy and consistency, and their observations are closely aligned to student
learning gains in classrooms.49 According to Lori Johnson, a participating TAP master teacher in Phoenix, «It was the best decision I ever made professionally.
Districts that invest heavily in better training and support
for their principals, only to treat them as ciphers once they are hired, are a long way from cultivating the brand of leadership described in this report, which holds that authority and
responsibility must be broadly exercised in order to create sustainable
learning improvements schoolwide.
In all 15 schools, the
improvement was a result of a team of educators within the school recognizing what their students needed to
learn and how they could
learn best and accepting
responsibility for meeting that need.
Learning Communities: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal al
Learning Communities: Professional
learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal al
learning that increases educator effectiveness and results
for all students occurs within
learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal al
learning communities committed to continuous
improvement, collective
responsibility, and goal alignment.
The Report's central conclusion is that, although traditional legal pedagogy is very effective in certain aspects, it overemphasizes legal theory and underemphasizes practical skills and professional development.5 By focusing on theory in the abstract setting of the classroom, the Report argues, traditional legal education undermines the ethical foundations of law students and fails to prepare them adequately
for actual practice.6 Traditional legal education is effective in teaching students to «think like lawyers,» but needs significant
improvement in teaching them to function as ethical and responsible professionals after law school.7 As I will discuss in greater detail below, in general, the Report recommends «contextualizing» and «humanizing» legal education by integrating clinical and professional
responsibility courses into the traditional core curriculum.8 In this way, students will
learn to think like lawyers in the concrete setting of actual cases and clients.9 The Report refers to pedagogical theories developed in other educational settings and argues that these theories show that teaching legal theory in the context of practice will not only better prepare students to be lawyers, it will also foster development of a greater and more deeply felt sense of ethical and professional identity.10
Professional
Responsibility (Practice + Professionalism)- Fall 2016, Fall 2017 Quantitative Methods
for Lawyers (Legal Analytics I)- Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Fall 2017 Legal Project Management + Legal Process
Improvement - Spring 2017, Spring 2018 Legal Analytics II (Machine
Learning for Lawyers)- Spring 2017, Spring 2018 Blockchain, Cryptocurrency + Law - Spring 2018 Electronic Discovery - Fall 2015 Civil Procedure - Spring 2016
In this self directed
learning approach to professional development, each lawyer has the
responsibility for the ongoing maintenance and
improvement in the substantive, technical, practical or intellectual components of the practice of law.
Strong procedures are in place to encourage a school - wide, shared
responsibility for student
learning and success, and to encourage the development of a culture of continuous professional
improvement that includes classroom - based
learning, mentoring and coaching arrangements.
The Curriculum and Instruction program addresses teacher empowerment and leadership in the expanded roles and
responsibilities of teachers in schools, including data - driven assessment
for school
improvement, professional
learning communities, applying research to practice, improving instruction and student
learning outcomes, and collaboration with families and communities.