Sentences with phrase «responsible for your harm»

There have been NO instances of any muslim living in the USA being responsible for harming any white or black person (s) in the name of religion.

«The RNDA wants to state that if any form of attack or destruction of oil pipelines and oil facilities happens in the creek of the region due to this shameless threat statement by the so - called Niger Delta Avengers, formed and coordinated by Tompolo and his cohorts, the people should hold Tompolo responsible for any harm or damage that the people will face.

«As Borough President, I'll bring all the responsible agencies and stakeholders together — police, transportation, consumer affairs and others — to reduce pass - through traffic to a minimum with fair tolling, encourage late - night deliveries, and improve regulation and enforcement so that truckers stick to truck routes, have the required safety equipment, and are held responsible for the harm they cause.»

I can not be responsible for any harm caused by your reliance on, or any use made of, information that I provide to you on the site.

We will not be responsible for any harm which results from your disclosure, or authorisation of the disclosure of your password or from use by any person of your password to gain access to your Account or Account Name.

Inspired by indigenous traditions, it brings together persons harmed with persons responsible for harm in a safe and respectful space, promoting dialogue, accountability, and a stronger sense of community.

BVF will hold Avigen responsible for any harm caused to BVF by these inaccuracies.

If you serve alcohol at your home, you can be held responsible for any harm that might occur to intoxicated guests, other parties, or any personal property stemming from their drinking.

We can not be held responsible for giving false advice or held responsible for any harm caused to any animal and we only know common information that can also be found on the internet.

The HSCC and the makers of this website are not responsible for any harm to / from any animal.

Neither the Stedelijk Museum nor those who supplied the information involved are responsible for harm which may arise as a consequence of errors, problems caused by or inherent in the distribution of the information by Internet, or for technical failures.

If a nation emitting high levels of ghgs refuses to reduce its emissions to its fair share of safe global emissions on the basis that there is too much scientific uncertainty to warrant action, if it turns out that human - induced climate change actually greatly harms the health and ecological systems on which life depends for tens of millions of others, should that nation be responsible for the harms that could have been avoided if preventative action had been taken earlier?

This question is designed to more expressly expose the ethical issue identified in response to question one, namely that high - emitting nations are responsible for the harms they are causing to others under the «polluter pays» principle of international law.

Given that for over 20 years since international climate change negotiations began, the United States has refused to commit to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions based upon the justification that there is too much scientific uncertainty to warrant action, if it turns out that human - induced climate change actually greatly harms the health and ecological systems on which life depends of others, should the United States be responsible for the harms that could have been avoided if preventative action had been taken earlier?

Seems to me many people who have little knowledge of climate science or substantive knowledge of actual impacts of warming (like the medical doctors worried about asthma) adopt as a default position to «do no harm»... IOW no matter the plausibility of the claimed harm, better to take whatever steps are suggested than to be possibly responsible for harm.

Despite these cases of companies and individuals being held responsible for harming wildlife, the USFWS has yet to punish any wind turbine company for their role in the deaths of protected bird species.

When a person or entity fails to act reasonably, they may be considered negligent and may be responsible for any harm they cause, even if by accident.

Nevertheless, and regardless of whether the large award is ultimately reduced, this award and others like it serve as reminders to large corporations that they are ultimately responsible for the harms caused by the products which they send out into the marketplace.

Moreover, if you suffer a serious burn injury, a product manufacturer or property owner could be responsible for the harm caused.

A personal injury case, also known as a tort case, is a dispute that occurs when somebody suffers harm from an accident or injury, and someone else could be considered legally responsible for that harm.

Contact Los Angeles Metrolink accident attorney Joshua W. Glotzer today to learn more about how you can hold negligent train operators and service providers responsible for the harm you have suffered.

If another person or the government is responsible for your harm, you may be entitled to compensation.

A driver who fails to uphold his / her legal duty to drive safely can and will be held financially responsible for harms that occur.

However, the law recognizes that this wrong and fault must be acknowledged, and that the person or company at fault must be responsible for the harm and loss.

It also holds adults who provide alcohol to minors responsible for any harm that is caused as a result of the minor's alcohol consumption.

Personal injury attorneys work diligently to hold parties responsible for harms, injuries, damages, and losses that result from accidents caused by intentional or negligent misconduct.

Large corporations are going to do what they can to aggressively defend themselves, so you need to obtain legal representation that will help you hold those responsible for your harm accountable.

Maine personal injury law holds negligent drivers responsible for the harm they cause.

Because employers have a responsibility to ensure a reasonably safe work environment, failure to do so might make them financially responsible for any harm suffered by their employees as a result.

Let Preszler Law help you hold the negligent party responsible for the harm they caused and secure the settlement or verdict you deserve.

Personal Injury Law: Personal injury cases are pursued if you feel that you have suffered harm from an injury or accident, where another party is responsible for that harm.

Who would ultimately be responsible for the harm caused by those cars?

That said, the main question was: who exactly committed the crime and why are they actually responsible for the harm suffered by IncumbentCo?

In our fight, we are determined to get our clients the compensation and justice they deserve, and we'll work tirelessly to try and hold individuals and entities responsible for the harm they have done.

When a company knows or should know about a potential risk and does nothing they can be held financially responsible for any harms that result.

A dedicated truck or auto accident attorney will investigate every aspect of your incident in order to determine who is responsible for the harms and losses that you have suffered.

Our goal is to obtain the justice you deserve and to hold responsible parties responsible for the harm they have caused.

Mr. Glotzer often takes on cases that other firms won't because he believes in holding manufacturers, distributors, and sellers responsible for the harms their products cause.

«Personal injury» refers to legal disputes that arise when one person suffers bodily harm from an accident or injury, and someone else might be legally responsible for that harm.

The person or company responsible for the harm you have experienced may be required to compensate you for losses and damages.

To hold them responsible for the harm they have done to you and your family.

«Personal injury» claims include legal disputes which come up when one individual experiences harm from an injury or accident, and somebody else may legally be responsible for that harm.

We understand that an unexpected injury can be devastating and will fight to make sure that you are fairly compensated by the person who is responsible for your harm.

We'll make sure that every guilty party is held completely responsible for the harm they caused.

When a property owner does not protect its visitors from harm, they can be held financially responsible for any harms that result.

However, the at - fault third party may be responsible for the harm they caused by their negligence.

Langstaff is one of only a very few reported Canadian decisions in which a day school (as opposed to a residential school at which students sleep over, where there is much precedent for vicarious liability) has been held indirectly or vicariously responsible for the harms flowing from the sexual misconduct of a staff member against a student.

Basically, in your negligence case, you must prove that the other party is liable or responsible for any harm caused to you because of the accident.

«Personal injury» cases are legal disputes that arise when one person suffers harm from an accident or injury, and someone else might be legally responsible for that harm.

If an employee is made the prime suspect in a workplace investigation but is found to be not responsible for the harm that was the subject of the investigation, can the employer nonetheless terminate the employee's employment on a without cause basis with impunity?