Sentences with phrase «responsible parties in the case»

Our firm will conduct the complex investigation needed to determine the exact cause and responsible parties in the case of a truck accident.

Not exact matches

Last July, the NLRB deemed McDonald's a joint employer and a responsible party in labor cases, a decision the company is still fighting, with a final decision expected in 2016.

«In many cases, the parties who were responsible are no longer living.

In the case of death or dismemberment, both parties are still responsible for paying back the principle with interest.

When an insured makes a claim, they assign their right of recovery to the insurance company, allowing the health insurance company in this case to go after the responsible party (you) to recover what they paid on the claim, through a process called subrogation.

The party responsible, in this case, is the Hawaii Invasive Species Authority — or any party with whom the Authority might choose to contract (which, I suppose, might actually include the likes of Stevenson and the trolls).

While drugs may be helpful in some cases, he wrote, «the trend of applying mind - altering drugs to help animals cope in stimulation - lacking and socially deprived domestic environments is an ethical concern that all responsible parties need to address.»

This is not the case for the majority of PPAs and leases, in which the third - party provider is responsible for maintenance or repairs.

Our powerful case management tool keeps a record of the exact state of the matter and reminders can be inserted automatically into the responsible parties» task list in Microsoft Outlook.

In this case, we can name all responsible parties in your personal injury lawsuit to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possiblIn this case, we can name all responsible parties in your personal injury lawsuit to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possiblin your personal injury lawsuit to ensure that you receive the maximum compensation possible.

Statutes are in place for every state to establish procedures for bringing actions against the responsible party or parties; in this case, it is called a Wrongful Death Statute.

We advise business clients and insurers on pollution and other environmental claims, and have extensive experience litigating claims under federal and state statutes in clean - up cases, either defending against liability and allocation among defendants, or seeking reimbursement for recovery costs from responsible parties.

The Division of Assets is responsible in a divorce case for dividing all marital property between the parties to the extent that the parties can not do themselves.

The Reinartz Law Firm handles all types of New Jersey injury cases, in addition to wrongful death matters, which are initiated by the estate of a deceased person against the negligent parties responsible for the untimely death.

In other cases, a private party may be responsible.

It is important to act swiftly in all drunk driving injury cases to preserve evidence, identify all responsible parties, and file a claim within the statutorily mandated time period.

In many cases, a civil lawsuit is the only way to hold a negligent party responsible for their actions.

The policy at issue in this case, was crafted in such a way that in order to engage the insurer's duty to defend, it required the communication, during the policy period, by a third party, of an intention to hold the Jesuits responsible for damages.36 In this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factorin this case, was crafted in such a way that in order to engage the insurer's duty to defend, it required the communication, during the policy period, by a third party, of an intention to hold the Jesuits responsible for damages.36 In this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factorin such a way that in order to engage the insurer's duty to defend, it required the communication, during the policy period, by a third party, of an intention to hold the Jesuits responsible for damages.36 In this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factorin order to engage the insurer's duty to defend, it required the communication, during the policy period, by a third party, of an intention to hold the Jesuits responsible for damages.36 In this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factorIn this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factorIn fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factors.

In many cases, you may be able to hold the party that caused the loss of your loved one responsible for their negligence and you may recover significant compensation for your losses.

In the first case, the spouse filing the divorce claims the other spouse is responsible for ruining the marriage, while in the other case no blame is placed on either partIn the first case, the spouse filing the divorce claims the other spouse is responsible for ruining the marriage, while in the other case no blame is placed on either partin the other case no blame is placed on either party.

In most of these cases, the responsible party will have liability insurance.

Our accomplished Atlanta drunk driving injury lawyers have the ability to prove dram shop liability in these cases, so that all responsible parties are held accountable for their actions.

This means sending a Summons to the party responsible after the case is registered in Court.

An attorney experienced in nursing home abuse cases may be able to assist families whose loved ones have become victims by initiating proceedings against the responsible parties.

In cases where third - party liability may have caused or contributed to your injuries, however, you may be able to file a third - party claim against the responsible party as well.

In most cases, PTSD victims will sue parties responsible for the onset of their symptoms through the avenue of personal injury law.

In some instances, especially in regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurreIn some instances, especially in regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurrein regards to product liability cases where there may be multiple manufacturers involved in the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurrein the creation of a dangerous or faulty product, there may be more than one party responsible for the injuries incurred.

In some cases of malpractice where hospital equipment has hurt a patient, some or all of these parties may be held responsible.

In this case we can hold any of these parties responsible for your injuries and file a claim against them.

It is important to have an experienced personal injury attorney review the facts in your case, investigate, and determine who all the possible responsible parties are.

Despite this general rule, courts have struggled with questions involving making owners of programmed systems responsible for damages suffered by third parties as a result of their use, in many cases due to policy concerns about imposing such liability... there is a significant difference between an entity that makes copies at the request of an individual and an entity that uses pre-programmed computers to carry out the request automatically...

During that time, he was responsible for drafting pleadings, tracking and drafting objections to plaintiff depositions; managing spread sheets to ensure deadlines were met; processing urgent incoming mail and distributing it to the appropriate parties; creating binders to be used in court; maintaining electronic case files in an organized manor, as well as a wide - range of other legal support tasks.

In most burn injury cases, the negligent party's insurance company is responsible for paying damages to the injured party.

In every accident and injury case, our law firm quickly seeks to determine the parties who are responsible and liable to cover damages, such as the other driver and their insurance company.

In a car accident case, this will be true even if the responsible party was a pedestrian or on a bicycle.

Mr. Doran has made such cases a mission and takes them on with personal commitment to seek the maximum possible compensation in a lawsuit or claim against the responsible party.

For example, in a hypothetical case where each party is equally responsible for an accident (50/50) and the damages (lost wages / medical bills) are $ 100,000, the recovery would be $ 50,000.

For those parties in the group litigation who succeed in their individual claims, the logical conclusion is that they have «won» their case and, by extension, payment of their costs should be covered by the «losing» defendant; but in the event that the winning parties ultimately make up a minority of the larger claimant group, it could be argued that, as a whole, the claimants are the «losing» party, responsible for the defendant's costs.

We can help you obtain the financial recovery you deserve for your injuries by figuring out the cause of the accident, naming all responsible parties in your lawsuit, negotiating with insurers, and taking your case to trial if necessary.

This is determined by any medical insurance They have but yes, Sometimes the driver responsible is going to need to cover the injured parties medical statements in case at fault for your crash.

Our attorneys will carefully investigate all aspects of your case, in order to discover what really happened and to document the negligence of the responsible party.

I have over 22 years of experience in personal injury claims, and if there is any difficulty in getting satisfaction from the responsible party's insurance company, I am very qualified to take the case to civil court to pursue justice.

In case you have been injured and another party is responsible for your injuries, you should seek compensation from an Atlanta accident attorney.

If you were hurt in an accident like one of these, the experienced Maine motorcycle accident attorney at Peter Thompson & Associates can assess the facts of your case to determine whether you have a viable lawsuit, and help you hold the parties responsible accountable for your damages.

In a wrongful death case, the insurance company for the negligent party may try to argue there were pre-existing conditions or that the person who died somehow was responsible.

In a premises liability case, there may be more than one party responsible for the property.

If you're concerned about how your case may proceed if you decide to file an injury claim in McAllen against the party responsible for your injuries, the legal team at Patino & Associates, can provide the answers to your questions and help you understand your options.

Depending on the type of product that injured you, and the circumstances of your accident, the responsible parties in a product liability case can include:

At Hefferon & Hefferon we will fight to hold the responsible parties accountable for their criminal or negligent misconduct in cases of serious injury or wrongful death.

We have extensive experience in handling boating injury cases in Miami and across South Florida, and we can help you protect your legal rights and hold any negligent parties responsible for your injuries or losses.