We should be
responsible pet owners just like we are in every other aspect of our lives.
Not exact matches
However, now I see that the old framework of putting a certain kind of
pet owner in the «
responsible / good» bucket and everyone else in the «irresponsible / bad» bucket
just doesn't make sense anymore, and it doesn't help us achieve our goals.
Wellness exams are not covered, but I feel that those expenses are
just part of being a
responsible pet owner.
However, being a
responsible pet owner isn't
just about the fun parts.
«The plaintiffs and their cohorts don't want there to be any standards for the
responsible care of dogs in commercial breeding facilities, and that's
just not acceptable to Texas
pet owners who want to protect dogs from cruelty and abuse.»
While I agree with much of his theories, I believe the problem we face with domestic
pets in this country is mutli - leveled, as I explained: Not enough
RESPONSIBLE homes (just because there are 17 million people looking for pets, if we accept that number, doesn't mean they will all be responsible pet owners or even keep their pets for a
RESPONSIBLE homes (
just because there are 17 million people looking for
pets, if we accept that number, doesn't mean they will all be
responsible pet owners or even keep their pets for a
responsible pet owners or even keep their
pets for a lifetime).
Please
just be sure to provide a reference and their contact information, so that we can confirm that you will be a loving,
responsible pet owner.
This will allow us to schedule appointments for
pets of other
responsible owners just like you.
having
just read about hip dysplasia in labs - 100 % of males who got fixed ended up with hip problems - as a «
responsible»
pet owner, my lab will not get fixed!
In Sweden, for example, there are virtually no homeless dogs; yet only 7 % of female dogs there are spayed - They are
just more
responsible pet owners than we are.