Sentences with phrase «rest of the universe»

«The burst appeared to be more luminous than the whole rest of the universe, and that would be very hard to explain by most current theories,» says California Institute of Technology professor of astronomy Shrinivas Kulkarni, who was part of a team that investigated GRB 990123.

Thus, according to the research, if the energy levels of particles could be simulated, so too could the rest of the universe.

You can't accept that atoms, molecules, chemical reactions in our bodies, and the rest of the universe just work somehow, but you can accept that a mystical all - knowing being simply created it all?

So the rest of the universe is just sitting there for no other purpose than our ooh's and ahh's.

That energy would then be free to interact with the rest of the universe as it did before being tied to one life form.

It took God more days to create earth than the rest of the universe.

But the point behind that little comment was to make us realize how small our lives are as compared to the rest of the universe and what it holds.

«Nowadays we are rediscovering the importance of the interactions between the earth and the rest of the universe, and so it makes perfect sense that we should also relearn to recognise the cosmic character of the liturgy.»

Each droplet, he wrote, strives to organize itself toward the fulfillment of its own interests without regard for the rest of the universe.

There, Wieman spoke with high praise of the role of the primordial nature of God in bringing into mutual support the becoming of epochal occasions whose efforts would otherwise be directed solely to the fulfillment of individual interests without concern for the rest of the universe.

Subjecting dictation of ALL THAT IS to human rationality (quickly: consider the «status» of humans on earth relative to the rest of the universe) is, well, nuts.

I can not believe that The Creator is anthropocentric — that the rest of the universe is simply window dressing because God really concentrated when making The Earth as opposed to, say — the Andromeda galaxy.

What is so pathetic is that you believe this all - powerful being actually needs the love of people who are just a speck of sand when compared to the rest of the universe.

The rest of the universe, oh so simple and boring compared to humanity, is simply window dressing — God really concentrated when making The Earth as opposed to, say — the Andromeda galaxy.

Neither does the rest of the universe.

it's completely nonsensical — how woud «you» have any influence over your body... it's just matter unfolding, exactly like the rest of the universe.

It took a longer «day» to create earth than the rest of the universe.

And every light ray pointed at us from the rest of the universe that appears to be billions of years old and represent 200 billion other galaxies?

By «God», of course you mean the deity character in the collection of mythologies known as the bible and by «His Word», you clearly mean the words written by men (but of course they were magically dictated by the deity character because, despite its omnipotence, it was incapable of simply «poofing» «His Word» into existence in the same manner alleged for the rest of the universe).

In these two views, God is either so closely related to the self that man's freedom is denied, or God is not at all related to the self with the result that the self is not related to the rest of the universe.

«10 But the for - itself can not really be related to the rest of the universe since it is nothingness.

The self is a creative concrescence of the past and the potential, and its relation to God and the rest of the universe is a novel adventure.

Whitehead's concept of God and of God's relation to the self permits man to be free and yet relates him to the rest of the universe.

We know very little indeed about what takes place in the rest of this universe.

This planet is of supreme importance to us, but to the rest of the universe it is largely irrelevant.

And wholeness includes a sense of at - one - ment with ourselves and the rest of the universe.

And to imagine that it is only a small particle of dust compared to the rest of the universe.

Such a shame that people like you think that what happenes on earth applies to the rest of the universe.

Thus the conception of an isolated system is not the conception of substantial independence from the remainder of things, but of freedom from casual contingent dependence upon detailed items within the rest of the universe.

Cause and effect surrounds us in this world and we deduce the same for the rest of the universe, based on our limited observations.

mankind is so insignifacant to the rest of the universe who in their right mind could be conceited enough to believe theres a god who created us in his image

Its us and the rest of the universe.

On this construction Wang's point would be that for the great man the whole world is a body, that the difference between his personal body and the rest of the universe is trivial, and that his feeling for the rest of the universe is of the sort most people have only for their personal bodies.

Why bother with the rest of the universe in that case?

It is Christians and other religious people who think the rest of the universe is dead.

So why are we any different with the rest of universe.

Foe all who believe in big bang theory — plse advise what was there before the bang — and to those who believe that god created erath 6 - 10 thousand years ago, what was god doing before that — was he on holidays and obe day he decides to create Adam and Eve — guess he was bired with the rest of the universe and created this awful.

All the structures that have previously been treated in physics and in chemistry belong to the class of «equilibrium structures»; that is, they could persist indefinitely in closed systems (regions separated from the rest of the universe by impermeable walls).

In our ordinary perception of events we take into account only those aspects with high grades of relevance, but as our attention deepens the lower grades come into notice, and in attending to these lower grades we discover the endless patterns of relationships that bind that event to the rest of the universe.

@ZJL I agree that the problem exists of «what came first» or first cause, but a serious study of probability involving just Darwinism (ignoring the problems involvled with the formation of a «perfect enviornment» and the rest of the universe) yields a probabilty so small that to write the number in longhand (without exponents or orders of magnitutude) would take no less than 100 years to put down on paper.

My personal opinion sounds a bit like science fiction, I suppose... I sort of think that God didn't create the rest of the universe just so we could have pretty stars in the sky.

, then the rest of the universe would form, then eventually much much much much later AFTER the sun forms, the earth would form, and our planet would develope from there (you're right, land came before water, but the bible says otherwise).

No amount of shouting from people that come to a conclusion about the universe and lives on a planet and has never left that planet to explore the rest of the universe can hardly give their 2 cents on the matter.