Sentences with phrase «restricted by a court order»

They should not be restricted by the court order when they want to chat with either parent.

The custodial parent can generally travel in state, out - of - state and out of the country with the child, unless restricted by a court order.

Not exact matches

Members of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Osun, on Wednesday expressed satisfaction over an order by the Federal High Court in Osogbo, that restricted the...

According to an order for declaratory judgment which was sent by Rosenblum to a New York state Supreme Court judge on Oct. 17, the mayor will seek to nullify a decision by the Democratic majority of Leon Potok, David Finch and Ilissa Miller on the village board to authorize a ballot referendum that — if passed by public vote on Election Day — would restrict Rosenblum's ability to appoint a village attorney as well as certain land use board members.

The Bank may act on the instructions of any owner; however, instructions to remove an owner's name or restrict an owner's use may only be made by the owner whose name is to be removed or whose use is to be restricted, by that owner's legal representative (s) or by court order.

The Court also ruled that if an order for disclosure of the agreements was subsequently made, it was minded to restrict the use that could be made of the documents, including by restricting access to ENRC's legal team, and not providing copies to certain identified senior officers of ENRC itself.

You have to treat the information as a secret in order for it to be recognized by a court and enforced as a trade secret — control it confidentially and restrict access to it.

It provides that an order may be made if the court is satisfied that a person has been involved in serious crime, whether that involvement was in England and Wales or elsewhere in the world, and where it has reasonable grounds to believe that the order would protect the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement by the subject of the order in serious crime in England and Wales.

In R. v. Hartman, 2015 ONCA 498 (CanLII), Ontario's Court of Appeal ordered a new trial for the accused but restricted the hearing to a determination of whether he is not criminally responsible by reason of a mental disorder or that he is guilty of the crime.

(2) Without restricting the generality of subsection (1), the order made by the court may require one or more of the following:

the document has been read to or by the court, or referred to, at a hearing held in public (although the court may make an order restricting or prohibiting the use of such a document);

Section 5 contains examples of the types of provisions that a serious crime prevention order might include, but does not limit the flexibility of the court, provided for by s 1 (3), to impose such provisions as it thinks appropriate for the purposes of protecting the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting the subject's involvement in serious crime.

This system has been put in place by the Provincial Court of Alberta in order to provide a means of giving notice of any application for a publication ban or an Order which would restrict the ability of the media to report on court proceedCourt of Alberta in order to provide a means of giving notice of any application for a publication ban or an Order which would restrict the ability of the media to report on court proceedorder to provide a means of giving notice of any application for a publication ban or an Order which would restrict the ability of the media to report on court proceedOrder which would restrict the ability of the media to report on court proceedcourt proceedings.

By restricting disclosure of protected health information to only that information specified in a court or administrative order or released pursuant to other types of lawful process only if the individual had notice and an opportunity to object or if the information was subject to a protective order, individuals who are concerned about disclosure of information concerning third parties will have the opportunity to raise that Start Printed Page 82677issue prior to the request for disclosure being presented to the covered entity.

I believe the question of felons in possession of weapons in relation to the second amendment has most certainly been carefully crafted by the supreme court in order to uphold the power of the federal government to restrict the r rights of free people.

Even though PSAs survive a judgment of divorce, a court's authority to modify its child support orders may never be restricted by an agreement between parents.

The Courts have powers under Part VII - Division 6 of the Family Law Act 1975 in appropriate circumstances to make an order restricting a parent or other person from removing a child from Australia by adding them to the airport watch list.

(1) A court exercising jurisdiction in proceedings under this Act may, by making a suppression order or non ‑ publication order on grounds permitted by this Part, prohibit or restrict the publication or other disclosure of: