A smattering of congressional Republicans — including some who have been staunchly opposed to gun control legislation — now suggest that they would be willing to take at least small steps toward
restricting gun rights.
Photographs depict truckloads of «good guys with guns» protecting students who are marching to
restrict the gun rights of other Americans.
Not exact matches
Lest you think that such vicious behavior is somehow
restricted only to
gun rights activists, consider the response of midwives and lactation consultants to the tragedies that arise as a result of their beloved ideologies.
The National Rifle Association, the country's most powerful lobby group for
gun rights, said Thursday that it would support an effort to
restrict bump stocks — an unusual move for a group that has long pushed back on efforts to impose new firearms regulations.
While research has shown that police chiefs are more likely to back measures that
restrict access to firearms, police officers tend to gravitate towards
gun rights.
The law also allows judges to ban
guns in courtrooms («This section shall in no way interfere with the
right of a trial judge to
restrict the carrying of firearms in the courtroom.»)
If you think this line of argument seems silly, would someone please explain how this law is any different from the proposals of the so - called «
gun grabbers» to require law - abiding
gun owners to register their weapons, and to
restrict the
right to ownership of certain kinds of weapons that are clearly designed only to kill human beings on an industrial scale?
«Who the hell gave David Hogg the authority to put on his white man's burden costume to save me from myself by marching to
restrict my
right to own a
gun that at one point I wasn't considered human enough to own?»
Progressive
gun control advocates here in America will often point to the
gun ban imposed in the United Kingdom as an excellent example of how significantly
restricting the
right of citizens to...